I’m really sorry guys and gals, I must be really thick here. The pprune post indicates a telegraph article as the point of error – but checking the telegraph article it seems to be pretty much the same as the original RAFM press release which has the correct information.

As yet I can’t find anywhere the source that caused the son to write in the first instance. I can’t see that it’s come from anything the RAFM has put out though so can only imagine it’s a bit of (standard) poor newspaper journalism.

FB