March 2, 2012 at 3:47 pm
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/01/uk-hongkong-airbus-idUSLNE82000X20120301
By: Bmused55 - 5th March 2012 at 07:22
Probably because said issue is no longer existant and hasn’t been for a decade or so.
The mirace of AD’s 😉
On a more serious note, this cancellation is about China flexing it’s muscles regarding the rediculous european aviation tax.
By: Mr Creosote - 4th March 2012 at 21:39
Funny, but when 737 orders are cancelled, you don’t see people jumping on the bandwagon and claiming it must be because of those rudder problems.
By: J Boyle - 4th March 2012 at 19:24
Don’t worry, the A380 will be a success…(whether Airbus will ever make any money off it is another question).
Whith the price of fuel always going up, it will make sense on some routes.
By: Vega ECM - 4th March 2012 at 09:22
Authur
Your right, not a single mention.
I guess some people who are ignorant to the technical aspects of continued airworthiness, can’t resist a single opportunity to promote and project their own personal prejudices.
By: Arthur Pewtey - 3rd March 2012 at 09:21
That’s odd, the Reuters article doesn’t mention wing cracks at all. Maybe it’s a different article.
By: John Green - 2nd March 2012 at 18:34
What was that I was writing about public confidence?
John Green
By: nJayM - 2nd March 2012 at 17:48
The irony about the cracks in the wings saga is that Filton is getting the blame
The irony about the cracks in the wings saga is that Filton is getting the blame.
Yikes.
I have in a hurry put the above post in the incorrect thread ( I had both threads open in two different windows).
It should be in
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=114874
Mods please sort out if you wish. Thanks