By: SHAMROCK321 - 20th March 2005 at 19:57
Oooopss I missed it sorry :S
By: SHAMROCK321 - 20th March 2005 at 19:57
Oooopss I missed it sorry :S
By: RIPConcorde - 20th March 2005 at 18:38
That looks rather nice. GAZGLA I read when Ryanair ordered the extra 800 that the winglets safe about 2% on fuel. I dont for one second doubt what you are saying but I was just wondering do you have an article about it I could read?
There appears to be a link in his post. 😉
By: RIPConcorde - 20th March 2005 at 18:38
That looks rather nice. GAZGLA I read when Ryanair ordered the extra 800 that the winglets safe about 2% on fuel. I dont for one second doubt what you are saying but I was just wondering do you have an article about it I could read?
There appears to be a link in his post. 😉
By: SHAMROCK321 - 20th March 2005 at 18:16
That looks rather nice. GAZGLA I read when Ryanair ordered the extra 800 that the winglets safe about 2% on fuel. I dont for one second doubt what you are saying but I was just wondering do you have an article about it I could read?
By: SHAMROCK321 - 20th March 2005 at 18:16
That looks rather nice. GAZGLA I read when Ryanair ordered the extra 800 that the winglets safe about 2% on fuel. I dont for one second doubt what you are saying but I was just wondering do you have an article about it I could read?
By: Arabella-Cox - 20th March 2005 at 17:57
Very nice, BTW a quick congratulations to my ex instructor Andreas for passing your exams for the 737! He’s got a job at Globespan, a wonder if he’s flying that?
By: Arabella-Cox - 20th March 2005 at 17:57
Very nice, BTW a quick congratulations to my ex instructor Andreas for passing your exams for the 737! He’s got a job at Globespan, a wonder if he’s flying that?
By: by738 - 20th March 2005 at 17:20
I remember thinking the tail was out of focus before, isnt it deliberate and to signify a “flying past” speed thing ?
By: by738 - 20th March 2005 at 17:20
I remember thinking the tail was out of focus before, isnt it deliberate and to signify a “flying past” speed thing ?
By: LBARULES - 20th March 2005 at 17:09
The tail does look out of focus – maybe its just the shot not the way its actually done.
I agree – they should of made the titles bigger the way that FlyBe should have done on the 733.
By: LBARULES - 20th March 2005 at 17:09
The tail does look out of focus – maybe its just the shot not the way its actually done.
I agree – they should of made the titles bigger the way that FlyBe should have done on the 733.
By: RIPConcorde - 20th March 2005 at 14:17
The design on the tail looks out of focus? and indeed, where are the winglets!? 😮 Doesn’t look quite as good on the B738 as on the B733 IMO, the titles fit the fuselage better on the shorter B733. Not bad though.
By: RIPConcorde - 20th March 2005 at 14:17
The design on the tail looks out of focus? and indeed, where are the winglets!? 😮 Doesn’t look quite as good on the B738 as on the B733 IMO, the titles fit the fuselage better on the shorter B733. Not bad though.
By: Bmused55 - 20th March 2005 at 11:28
And look, no eyebrow windows 😉
By: Bmused55 - 20th March 2005 at 11:28
And look, no eyebrow windows 😉
By: LBARULES - 20th March 2005 at 10:53
Oh right, I didnt know.
Maybe they’ll get fitted before delivery ?
By: LBARULES - 20th March 2005 at 10:53
Oh right, I didnt know.
Maybe they’ll get fitted before delivery ?
By: GAZGLA - 20th March 2005 at 10:47
Was it supposed to have them?
“The Boeings are fitted with blended winglets. These are new features designed by Boeing and they are highly efficient, saving us four per cent on fuel bills. We are the launch customer in the UK for the fitting of such devices.”
By: GAZGLA - 20th March 2005 at 10:47
Was it supposed to have them?
“The Boeings are fitted with blended winglets. These are new features designed by Boeing and they are highly efficient, saving us four per cent on fuel bills. We are the launch customer in the UK for the fitting of such devices.”
Sign In
March 20, 2005 at 10:36 am
