July 30, 2013 at 7:25 pm
hi,
visited Sandown airport this pm,only Airframe Assemblies working, so cap in hand asked at reception to have a look and they provided me with a guide.There are 3 frames being rebuilt I was told EE602, PT809 which I think I misheard and should be PT879,and lastly BS410/G-TCHI.
BS410 had skin on,the other 2 in frames without.
I mentioned the Hurricane BH238,with which he pointed out a trailer close by,and he said what there is of it is in that.
regards
jack…
By: Trolly Aux - 1st August 2013 at 06:25
D’oh. my mistake. thank you for the clarification. eas years ago.
TA
By: mackerel - 31st July 2013 at 23:52
Trolly Aux, Hangar 11 dont own BS410. It is owned by Devon a businessman. PT879 is Hangar 11’s !
Steve”P”
By: Propstrike - 31st July 2013 at 14:05
There is already a two-tier pricing structure in place for Spitfires. Just look at Platinum Fighter Sales’ website. They are offering an older restoration of a Mk IX Spitfire, done 25 years ago and with some 350 hours on both engine and airframe since restoration, for $3.4m. Around $2.2m will get you a recently-restored Mk XVIII, with less than 5 years and 50 hours since restoration.
Evidently there is even ‘Spitfire snobbery’ within the Spitfire community.
Snobbery ? Some marks are perceived as more desirable than other for reasons such as historical significance or handling qualities, and to make that distinction does not merit disdain , disapproval or censure.
Nobody is being deceived by airframes on offer and their individual history. All information is ‘out there’ , what is what and where it came from, and nobody will spend seven figure sums and not know what it is they are buying into.
We seem to harbour a core of individuals who almost wish the ‘Spitfire restoration industry’ would shut down, pack up and disappear. Quite odd.
By: Trolly Aux - 31st July 2013 at 13:41
I often wonder what price would be put on MH434 if it ever came up for sale. It has a wonderfull post war history. Good news on the Hangar 11 BS410/G-TCHI I last see it in bits many years ago, lots of usable parts in that one.
By: Mike J - 31st July 2013 at 13:00
There is already a two-tier pricing structure in place for Spitfires. Just look at Platinum Fighter Sales’ website. They are offering an older restoration of a Mk IX Spitfire, done 25 years ago and with some 350 hours on both engine and airframe since restoration, for $3.4m. Around $2.2m will get you a recently-restored Mk XVIII, with less than 5 years and 50 hours since restoration.
Less than 2/3 the price for arguably a better airframe/engine combination, but without the cachet of being a wartime Mk IX with combat history.
Just look at all the ‘data-plate specials’ being knocked out these days, they are almost all Merlin-engined marks, and yet quite a few Griffon-engined projects have been lying fallow for decades.
Evidently there is even ‘Spitfire snobbery’ within the Spitfire community.
By: alertken - 31st July 2013 at 12:23
Glut
#2, ibf: I suggest, quite the reverse. As more folk enjoy the exquisite pain of seeking to park the odd million, some will find their way to a warbird. Few will be unique, unlike Tracy Emin’s bed, and will be dearer to own, but will never be fad-fashionable rubbish. Replica business has been confined to types either extinct or with no Design Record, because the cost of a replica would be comparable to that of a “restoration”. But when the last Mustang/ Spitfire/Hurricane/Merlin data plate has been bolted onto new-build parts, two-tier pricing will emerge: £1Mn. for a replica, >£1Mn. for an “original”. Not a pseudo (Caterham 7) but new-build faithful clone…actually as recent resurrections from very dead. 300 million middle class Indians, same Chinese (each predicted within a decade), will include a couple of dozen each, willing to pay a lot for a new build…anything – LaGG, MiG, FW190, Tempest.
By: jack windsor - 31st July 2013 at 10:35
Jack, if you look at VMI engineering website you can read all about EE602.
Steve”P”
hi,
thanks Steve “P”, as you say ALL about her,i did,nt know this site but a very interesting read,
thanks again,regards,
jack…
By: mackerel - 30th July 2013 at 23:23
Jack, if you look at VMI engineering website you can read all about EE602.
Steve”P”
By: jack windsor - 30th July 2013 at 23:15
hi,
thanks very much,just doubting my eyes as its not mentioned any where I,ve seen demobbed, etc.
regards
jack…
By: mackerel - 30th July 2013 at 22:15
Hi, EE602 is EE602 & not EP122.
Steve”P”
By: jack windsor - 30th July 2013 at 21:53
hi,
sorry but further checking apparently EE602(which I,m positive was on the end frame) is EP122? confirmation anyone?
regards
jack…
By: 1batfastard - 30th July 2013 at 19:58
Hi All,
jack Windsor With the recent influx of airworthy spits plus those mentioned on the I.O.W.,will those being restored to Airworthiness elsewhere reduce the price of those already on the mkt ? in fact with all restoration builds no matter what aircraft (WWII Fighters in particular) in view of recent advertisements would it reduce the price as there seems to be a forthcoming glut of airworthy airframes to choose from ?
Geoff.:D