dark light

757

Hi

I was just looking at the Boeing website, and it only mentions 757-200/300 was there a 100 series?

Sam

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,029

Send private message

By: greekdude1 - 16th March 2004 at 17:30

Originally posted by Ren Frew
Wasn’t the original t-tailed 757 concept dubbed the 100 series ?

I also read somewhere that at the time of trying to initially sell the 757/767 to new customers the 100 series was considered unpopular as a mark by Boeing following poor sales of the 721 the most popular 737 mark at the time was also the 732.

Therefore the original production series of 757/767’s was redubbed the 200 series.

This is pretty accurate, Ren, at least according to all the readings I have done on both aircraft.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

11,401

Send private message

By: Ren Frew - 16th March 2004 at 13:13

Wasn’t the original t-tailed 757 concept dubbed the 100 series ?

I also read somewhere that at the time of trying to initially sell the 757/767 to new customers the 100 series was considered unpopular as a mark by Boeing following poor sales of the 721 the most popular 737 mark at the time was also the 732.

Therefore the original production series of 757/767’s was redubbed the 200 series.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,331

Send private message

By: wysiwyg - 16th March 2004 at 13:02

I’ve always found rivetting absolutely rivetting!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

781

Send private message

By: GZYL - 16th March 2004 at 11:15

No probs… take a rivet gun instead… riveting is much more theraputic too! 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

781

Send private message

By: GZYL - 15th March 2004 at 13:28

Nice idea… just don’t take the welding equipment… aluminium don’t weld that well!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,029

Send private message

By: greekdude1 - 12th March 2004 at 17:34

When I say ‘disgusting,’ it means ‘unbelievable.’

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,274

Send private message

By: Jeanske_SN - 12th March 2004 at 12:47

Was there a 767-100 proposed? That would have looked very short!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,047

Send private message

By: SOFTLAD - 12th March 2004 at 11:43

I doubt that very much.The 757 as it stands is overpowered,so if it was shorter and lighter and had the same engines the performance would be outstanding.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,029

Send private message

By: greekdude1 - 11th March 2004 at 17:22

That thing would have had absolutely disgusting performance.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,177

Send private message

By: tenthije - 11th March 2004 at 15:53

it was proposed by Boeing but the airlines weren’t interested. The design would be too heavy. Instead Boeing developed the 738 and 739.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

77

Send private message

By: spacemaid - 11th March 2004 at 15:18

thank you.

any reason why?

Sam

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,052

Send private message

By: Bhoy - 11th March 2004 at 15:15

no, there wasn’t.

Sign in to post a reply