March 11, 2004 at 3:10 pm
Hi
I was just looking at the Boeing website, and it only mentions 757-200/300 was there a 100 series?
Sam
By: greekdude1 - 16th March 2004 at 17:30
Originally posted by Ren Frew
Wasn’t the original t-tailed 757 concept dubbed the 100 series ?I also read somewhere that at the time of trying to initially sell the 757/767 to new customers the 100 series was considered unpopular as a mark by Boeing following poor sales of the 721 the most popular 737 mark at the time was also the 732.
Therefore the original production series of 757/767’s was redubbed the 200 series.
This is pretty accurate, Ren, at least according to all the readings I have done on both aircraft.
By: Ren Frew - 16th March 2004 at 13:13
Wasn’t the original t-tailed 757 concept dubbed the 100 series ?
I also read somewhere that at the time of trying to initially sell the 757/767 to new customers the 100 series was considered unpopular as a mark by Boeing following poor sales of the 721 the most popular 737 mark at the time was also the 732.
Therefore the original production series of 757/767’s was redubbed the 200 series.
By: wysiwyg - 16th March 2004 at 13:02
I’ve always found rivetting absolutely rivetting!
By: GZYL - 16th March 2004 at 11:15
No probs… take a rivet gun instead… riveting is much more theraputic too! 🙂
By: GZYL - 15th March 2004 at 13:28
Nice idea… just don’t take the welding equipment… aluminium don’t weld that well!
By: greekdude1 - 12th March 2004 at 17:34
When I say ‘disgusting,’ it means ‘unbelievable.’
By: Jeanske_SN - 12th March 2004 at 12:47
Was there a 767-100 proposed? That would have looked very short!
By: SOFTLAD - 12th March 2004 at 11:43
I doubt that very much.The 757 as it stands is overpowered,so if it was shorter and lighter and had the same engines the performance would be outstanding.
By: greekdude1 - 11th March 2004 at 17:22
That thing would have had absolutely disgusting performance.
By: tenthije - 11th March 2004 at 15:53
it was proposed by Boeing but the airlines weren’t interested. The design would be too heavy. Instead Boeing developed the 738 and 739.
By: spacemaid - 11th March 2004 at 15:18
thank you.
any reason why?
Sam
By: Bhoy - 11th March 2004 at 15:15
no, there wasn’t.