dark light

787 inflight photos

Saw this link posted on another forum, and thought some of you guys here would like to see the photos on the link – it looks great in the air!

http://s905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/robertmhilljr/787%20Views%20from%20chase%20plane/

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,139

Send private message

By: EGTC - 23rd January 2010 at 21:02

They look. 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 23rd January 2010 at 18:39

The second 787 to fly was in ANA colours (which I’m guessing is the same one shown in these photos) and I think it had its first flight around a week after the one in the Dreamliner scheme first flew, so they do indeed have 2 flying.

Paul

I’m impressed, they seem to be making up for lost time.

But the flight test division is working 7 days a week and late nights.
I’m guessing that the pilots are on a flight hour restriction.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,514

Send private message

By: PMN - 23rd January 2010 at 16:57

Perhaps I’m missing something , but I thought the first 787 flying had Boeing house colours. These shots show ANA markings.

Do they already have a second aircraft flying?

The second 787 to fly was in ANA colours (which I’m guessing is the same one shown in these photos) and I think it had its first flight around a week after the one in the Dreamliner scheme first flew, so they do indeed have 2 flying.

Paul

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 23rd January 2010 at 16:54

Perhaps I’m missing something , but I thought the first 787 flying had Boeing house colours. These shots show ANA markings.

Do they already have a second aircraft flying?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,226

Send private message

By: rdc1000 - 23rd January 2010 at 12:54

I don’t think the factory paint scheme shows the aircraft to best advantage, either.

Until now I’ve thought the aircraft looked awful ‘in real life’, but these have changed my mind, so I think you’re right.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,514

Send private message

By: PMN - 23rd January 2010 at 12:30

EXIF shows these were taken with a D2x. I think they’re real, they just look like they’ve had quite a bit of processing. They’re the wrong colour space for the internet, though! 😀

They’re still superb images and I still think she’s a stunningly beautiful aircraft. Can’t wait to see her!

Paul

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,748

Send private message

By: Tartan Pics - 23rd January 2010 at 11:38

Was thinking same as you Lance… i don’t think these are real?? No sign of these on A-net or JP either???

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,725

Send private message

By: Grey Area - 23rd January 2010 at 10:33

Maybe it’s just my monitor, or my tired old eyes playing tricks, but they look a lot like FS screengrabs to me.

It does look nice, though.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,114

Send private message

By: symon - 23rd January 2010 at 10:28

It’s not a grand aesthetic design change from, say, the 767 (certainly not the frozen design, the early designs looked quite different). However, it does look different and to me it does look good. Looks great in flight with gear up. As with most aircraft I think some liveries will make it look a lot better than others.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

554

Send private message

By: davecurnock - 23rd January 2010 at 09:39

Looks like the rear of the engine nacelle was designed as a pastry cutter.:D

I don’t think the factory paint scheme shows the aircraft to best advantage, either. (But it probably won’t be sold as ‘the best looking aircraft around’).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,162

Send private message

By: A330Crazy - 23rd January 2010 at 04:03

Hopefully working now?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6,514

Send private message

By: PMN - 23rd January 2010 at 02:05

That’s just linking to the home page for me, Andrew. I have to agree though, from the videos I’ve seen she looks superb in the air!

Paul

Sign in to post a reply