dark light

A BBMF Spitfire

Hello All
After the last success with info about Shuttleworth’s Brisfit, here’s a question about Spitfire PR19 PS915.
When it began with BBMF sometime around 1990 when I photographed it, it was painted the nice PR blue with no unit markings. I understand that it previoussly operated with the Temperature and Humidity Flight from, I believe Hooton, though this might be wrong. Can any body clear up whether its markings in 1990 were authentic and, if so, were they the Thum flight markings or something else?
Incidentally, I tried a couple more questions on the Anson thread, but nobody’s bitten yet.
All the best.
Dave

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

125

Send private message

By: PDS - 21st November 2005 at 21:05

It’s RM689, I think – note the tailwheel in the first pic.

Thanks

I didn’t see that.

I shall keep looking…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 21st November 2005 at 20:52

It’s RM689, I think – note the tailwheel in the first pic.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

125

Send private message

By: PDS - 21st November 2005 at 18:46

I think I have found PS915 ‘in action’ in the film.

Hopefully Mark12 can confirm.

It looks like a PRXIX and it is carrying the codes AI-A….

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 18th November 2005 at 09:54

E.I.E.I.O. plus 1

A little research on a downloaded still reveals yet another code combination for TB382….AI-G.

Not just the three blade broad root Dowty prop, but this combined with the distinctive ‘fingerprint’ of the studio applied ‘distressing’ of the roundel.

To the top right AI-B is TE476. A ‘Markaddie’ also briefly fitted with a Dowty three blader. No, not identified from this shot 🙂 but the position of the fuel drum, trolleyacc, removed cowling, chock and background match exactly a shot taken by Ron Cranham at North Weald.

Mark

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v634/Mark12/Album%202/Pdvd_014.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 16th November 2005 at 15:36

… and also **-Q, AI-A, AI-E, AI-F, AI-H, AI-O, AI-P, AI-R, BO-B, BO-H, CD-*,CD-A, DO-A, DO-L, DO-M, EQ-*, EQ-A & LC-A.

…and I am sure there are more to come.

Mark

E I E I O? 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 15th November 2005 at 22:21

BUT I have found another picture of it in my collection as DO-M.

… and also **-Q, AI-A, AI-E, AI-F, AI-H, AI-O, AI-P, AI-R, BO-B, BO-H, CD-*,CD-A, DO-A, DO-L, DO-M, EQ-*, EQ-A & LC-A.

…and I am sure there are more to come.

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

125

Send private message

By: PDS - 15th November 2005 at 22:13

Sorry Mark12..

I was so busy looking through my books, I did not see your reply..

I knew you would be first to have the answer AGAIN….

Thanks

PDS.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

125

Send private message

By: PDS - 15th November 2005 at 22:10

Certain identifying features?

Yes, I just found it…

Bob Rudhalls first book.. page 131.

TB382.. 3 Blade prop. 6 Tubular exhaust stubs. No wingtip nav lights..

Mind you SM411 is identified the same!?

BUT I have found another picture of it in my collection as DO-M.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 15th November 2005 at 22:04

I must get out more.

Any reason why?

The process:-

1) It is long nose with universal filter so therefore a Mk IX or a Mk XVI.

2) It is a non flyer because it is carrying the wire aerial, has no nav lights etc.

3) It has the three aperture 12″ wheels.

4) It has the three blade broad root Dowty propeller. Although there were other static aircraft briefly fitted with this prop arrangement, TB382 fitted with such a prop was the principal taxier and start up machine along with SM411 with a three blade DH prop. The close up aircraft.

5) It has the round straight exhausts as opposed to the flared, slightly upturned and in some cases irregular exhausts.

6) TB382 is the logical choice before even looking at the other three blade IX/XVIs to eliminate them

7) Comparison with chip marks on the front of the cowlings/fasteners, stains adjacent to the access panel on the front side cowling, stain lines on the camou adjacent to the ‘AI’ all match with the TB382 data base images at various stages through the filming with 30 odd shots of TB382 I have on file.

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 15th November 2005 at 21:50

Any reason why?

Certain identifying features?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

125

Send private message

By: PDS - 15th November 2005 at 20:54

No, not a Markaddie.

A high back Mk XVI – TB382.

Mark

Any reason why?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 15th November 2005 at 20:37

No, not a Markaddie.

A high back Mk XVI – TB382.

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

125

Send private message

By: PDS - 15th November 2005 at 20:25

Is it not a Mark Addie?

Yes, Think you are right.. But which one???

Anyone like to guess??

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 15th November 2005 at 20:08

Is it not a Mark Addie?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

125

Send private message

By: PDS - 15th November 2005 at 20:04

Bear with me Mark12…

I need convincing that the ‘action shot’ from the film they have used in the book is actually PS915…

If you look at the 2 images below. It does not look like a PRXIX to me. Okay they heavily modified them…

The obvious differences are Rudder, Prop, Canopy, Aerial mast, Tailwheel, Radiators??

Mark12 convince me please…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 15th November 2005 at 17:32

Pictures in ‘Born Again, Spitfire PS915’ shows it painted in Silver with a red spinner and underwing serials in 1954 and in 1956 it was re-painted in PRU Blue with a Yellow spinner…

PDS

Yes but only in the captions to Black and White photographs.

There is also a fine shot on page 31 with a fully armoured front screen assembly in the BoB film!! It is coded AI-R so it must be PS915 like the other shot (actually taken by Ron Cranham and supplied to Wally Rouse by myself).

Not confidence building on the captions front. 🙂

Incidentally this book is currently on ebay and someone here was looking for it recently

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

125

Send private message

By: PDS - 15th November 2005 at 15:32

Interpreting B/W images it seems PS915 when operated by the THUM flight had at least two liveries, overall silver and overall PR Blue both sporting the post WWII ‘A’ type roundel and equi-coloured fin flash. Spinner colour varied over the period and an underwing serial was carried initially.
Mark

Pictures in ‘Born Again, Spitfire PS915’ shows it painted in Silver with a red spinner and underwing serials in 1954 and in 1956 it was re-painted in PRU Blue with a Yellow spinner…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10

Send private message

By: bgrose - 15th November 2005 at 13:37

Spitfire PRXIX – PS915 at Woodville in 1947 was in post war colours. Silver.
It was repainted to represent PS888 of 81 Sqn PR Unit, and was THE LAST Spitfire to fly an Official sortie in the R.A.F. This took place at R.A.F. Seletar, Singapore on 1st April 1954. It was subsequently named ‘THE LAST!’. I took photgraphs before, during painting and after. Apparenty, the only person who did. I supplied the ground crew with some white paint and brush. PS888 was in wartime colours. PRU Blue and Med Sky Grey. Although it should have been in Silver, it was time expired, and sold with PS890 and PS836 to the Royal Thai Air Force as Instructional Airframes.
PS890 was sold to the U.S.A. and now flies in France fitted with a R-R Griffon and Conta – Rotating propeller from a Shackleton.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

181

Send private message

By: usernamechanged - 19th October 2005 at 11:16

I could’nt resist a comment, you know me “big gob”.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

50

Send private message

By: BBMF - 19th October 2005 at 10:37

Are you saying you are pond life or you don’t listen to him? Anyway there must be better things to do on your days off!!!

You cant say that about our stormin, he is a bottomless pit of aircraft information and technical knowhow for which he is well renouned at BBMF for sharing with the pond life that hangs on his every word.

1 2
Sign in to post a reply