By: Geforce - 21st April 2001 at 12:37
RE: A340-600 vs. B767-400
Comparing the A-340 with the B767 is an embarresment for Airbus. You should at least compare the A-340 with the 777, because the 767 is a medium range airliner and both the A-340 and 777 are long range airliners.
Greetings
Geforce
By: KabirT - 16th April 2001 at 17:05
RE: A340-600 vs. B767-400
looks go secondry, i totally agree, 4 engines better than to especially flights over the Atlantic or the Pacific. But the main drawback of the 767-400 is old parts from the 767-200ER. Old CT-100 navi. systemetc. Thats what makes it good for nothing.
By: keltic - 15th April 2001 at 18:23
RE: A340-600 vs. B767-400
Airbus forever. Four engines are better than two in ETOPS
(Engine Trouble Or Passengers Swimming):-). The B767-400 looks really bad, too long.
By: mikey0118 - 15th April 2001 at 17:40
RE: A340-600 vs. B767-400
Without a doubt, it has to be Airbus!
By: nletters - 14th April 2001 at 18:36
RE: A340-600 vs. B767-400
Boeing by far.
Sign In
February 11, 2001 at 11:34 am