By: HURRICANE 477 - 14th January 2004 at 21:13
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
Oh well gotta go…………..
By: brenmcc1 - 14th January 2004 at 19:06
yes Michael that was our point.
By: T5 - 13th January 2004 at 20:58
I’d also agree that the child in those pictures did not look the age you say he was.
To me.. he looked perhaps 11 or 12 at the oldest. But good job you’ve removed them.
By: EAL_KING - 13th January 2004 at 20:47
LOL
By: Flood - 13th January 2004 at 20:44
Originally posted by LukeEGTE
I think everyone should respect Adam/Handly-Page from now on.
You think that will happen?;)
Anyway. That Snapper, eh? Bloody hell!
Go and have fun!:D
Flood.
By: LukeEGTE - 13th January 2004 at 20:39
Ok, Pictures deleted.
He is 16/17 defenetly and we know he looks younger. He doesn’t mind though because he likes getting cheap bus and train tickets.
I think everyone should respect Adam/Handly-Page from now on.
By: Flood - 13th January 2004 at 20:31
If we put it to a vote do you think everyone would agree that the child in the picture was over 16?
I have to have permission before I can photograph any child in a school, and it can be similar with higher education establishments too.
You could end up on the wrong end of the web master too.
You’ve had a laugh, now pick on someone else. Me, or Snapper, for example.
Flood.
By: LukeEGTE - 13th January 2004 at 20:28
Nope, over 16.
But apparently hellaid/adam isn’t here anyway so the pic could be of anyone, so what does it matter.
By: Flood - 13th January 2004 at 20:26
Not sure you should be posting pictures of children under 16 years of age, or apparently so, on this forum.
Leave it boys. Please.
Flood.
By: LukeEGTE - 13th January 2004 at 20:22
Ok fair enough. :p
By: T5 - 13th January 2004 at 20:20
Shut the f**k up you idiots!
By: brenmcc1 - 13th January 2004 at 17:19
To my best knowlage 16.
By: LukeEGTE - 13th January 2004 at 17:18
16 I think.
By: brenmcc1 - 13th January 2004 at 17:16
Cheese Muppet!!
Sign In
January 13, 2004 at 4:36 pm