May 6, 2011 at 8:59 pm
Catchy name, do those destinations ring a bell? :confused::diablo:
By: MSR777 - 10th May 2011 at 19:59
Didn’t Ipswich get waterlogged? They were a great couple, although I only met Merlyn a couple of times, and as a fairly regular flyer you felt like one of the family. The chilled salads were very appetising and the whole experienced was a delight. 20 minutes check-in time I seem to recall and time from engine stop to driving away in the car less than 10 minutes!!
I think you’re right, they were with us at STN for around a month I think, but it was some time ago now, so it could have been longer. Funny, since we got on to the Suckling thing, I can remember that Merlyn used to have little baskets of flowers sent down with the catering each day, these flowers were put on the check in desks for each flight…..real flowers mind you! When the stay with us was over, they gave us several bottles of bubbly, some beers, and a huge cake. More than BA ever did;)
By: tenthije - 10th May 2011 at 18:25
Would that be 45’s or 33 & 1/3’s? :diablo:
A4 legal paper.
By: EGTC - 10th May 2011 at 17:50
There was a program on BBC4 ages ago about Suckling Airways…I think it was called “40 years on” or something similar and basically went right back to the start and then showed how it had grown into what it was nowadays (prior to the take over by CityJet, mind you!).
I saw that programme too! It was very interesting and informative. It was really good to see an airline in its early years and then seeing how it had progressed years later.
By: Sky High - 10th May 2011 at 13:47
Didn’t Ipswich get waterlogged? They were a great couple, although I only met Merlyn a couple of times, and as a fairly regular flyer you felt like one of the family. The chilled salads were very appetising and the whole experienced was a delight. 20 minutes check-in time I seem to recall and time from engine stop to driving away in the car less than 10 minutes!!
By: nJayM - 10th May 2011 at 13:43
It wasn’t difficult to see the real message in your ‘tongue in cheek’ post
Catchy name, do those destinations ring a bell? :confused::diablo:
http://ellanvanninairways.com/
It wasn’t difficult to see the real message in your ‘tongue in cheek’ opening post.
It my also carry the alternative name “On a Wing and a Prayer”
By: kev35 - 10th May 2011 at 12:43
With an inflated ego I think they would be 78’s.
Regards,
kev35
By: cloud_9 - 10th May 2011 at 11:12
There was a program on BBC4 ages ago about Suckling Airways…I think it was called “40 years on” or something similar and basically went right back to the start and then showed how it had grown into what it was nowadays (prior to the take over by CityJet, mind you!).
By: MSR777 - 10th May 2011 at 08:27
Leaving aside the potential viability of the airline I fondly remember using Suckling at Cambridge simply to avoid the hassle of Stansted. That was a few years ago so I can imagine what Stansted is like now….
Yes, like you I remember it well. They based themselves with us at STN for a few weeks back in the 80s. I think it was something to do with problems at Ipswich airport. They were a nice couple. On the customer service front, both on the ground and in the cabin, it was Merlyn Suckling that ruled the roost. On the flight deck and on the operational side however, Roy Suckling was King! The inflight catering used to be made and ‘packaged up’ in the kitchen of a house in Ipswich, it used to be roaded down from there to STN, and it looked well up to ‘flag carrier standard’. I have a documentary on them both on disc called “Darling, shall we set up an airline?” Their customer base was very loyal, probably still is, although the airline has changed somewhat since the good ol’ single Do228 days!
By: Newforest - 10th May 2011 at 07:20
Maybe the unmentionable has figured out it´s best not to keep too many records. They can come back to haunt you later.
Would that be 45’s or 33 & 1/3’s? :diablo:
By: tenthije - 9th May 2011 at 22:58
The unmentionable one can’t be involved because on the link to the Indulgence Group website I can’t see any mention of record shops.
Maybe the unmentionable has figured out it´s best not to keep too many records. They can come back to haunt you later.
By: kev35 - 9th May 2011 at 22:31
The unmentionable one can’t be involved because on the link to the Indulgence Group website I can’t see any mention of record shops.
Regards,
kev35
By: kev35 - 9th May 2011 at 19:50
Does that apply to paper aeroplanes too?
Regards,
kev35
By: Newforest - 9th May 2011 at 19:50
Three days for the unmentionable to be mentioned, rather slow on the uptake of late. I gave you the clues about the destinations/hubs. :diablo:
By: cloud_9 - 9th May 2011 at 19:05
Thanks for that Geo73.;)
By: Geo73 - 9th May 2011 at 16:20
Cloud 9
Aircraft on the Isle of Man “M” register cannot be used for commercial operations.
By: Bmused55 - 9th May 2011 at 15:41
He is involved isn’t he? He who cannot be named….
Regards,
kev35
After the last fiasco where confessions were made, I doubt he’d ever get anyone to back him again.
By: J31/32 - 9th May 2011 at 15:09
Some more musings here:
http://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/450810-ellan-vannin-airways.html
By: Grey Area - 9th May 2011 at 14:34
I haven’t dared to look, Kev.
By: kev35 - 9th May 2011 at 11:28
He is involved isn’t he? He who cannot be named….
Regards,
kev35
By: Sky High - 9th May 2011 at 10:54
Hmmm…well only living a ‘gnats whisker’ away from Cambridge, it would be good to see this happen, but I have my doubts, especially with the close proximity of STN. For me its 20 mins to either. Then again it might work, and I and some others will be proved wrong, but like GA, I also have a strong sense of Deja Vu about this one.
Leaving aside the potential viability of the airline I fondly remember using Suckling at Cambridge simply to avoid the hassle of Stansted. That was a few years ago so I can imagine what Stansted is like now….