June 18, 2009 at 6:32 pm
It happens today (June 19) in Jakarta, Indonesia. There was remaining fuel in the wing, too bad 🙁
By: nJayM - 21st June 2009 at 20:58
Yes, I saw the “Megastructures: 747 Demolition”. They guy said you must make sure about the tanks.
Here are some facts from the same documentary –
Not just the fuel but hazardous Uranium !!!
Megastructures 747 Demolition Channel 5 30 September 2008
After 24 years too old and too expensive – flown 12 times round the world
6 million pieces
AeroTurbine – Arizona
Salvaged parts £3.4 million
30% of recovered parts used in 747s
When new takes 100s of people 4 months to build
To break takes a few people 12 weeks using manuals used to construct
1st – Engines x 4
2nd – All recoverable parts for sale
3rd – Hazardous material
4th – Crush to extract aluminium, steel, copper, wire
Engines when new cost £2.5million after salvage will fetch £750,000 (£3 m for all 4 engines)
150 man hours to remove 4 engines
Recoverable parts/instruments – recalibrated and re-sold for use estimated value >£35,000
Cockpit Voice recorder, Flight Data recorder recovered from above passenger cabin at rear
Nose – Radome (normally withstands 500mph winds) weighs 90 kg after salvage can fetch £8,000
Actuators each approx. 90 kg x 10 fetch £40,000 – 2 in each wing flaps, 2 in rudder and 4 in tail flaps
5 sets of landing gear each can fetch £25,000
Even a coffee maker can fetch £1,000
Hazardous material must be removed fully – depleted uranium used to counterweight in tail for stabilization in flight. If exposed to heat during demolition depleted uranium can become radioactive. Not for smelting.
Fuel tanks must be emptied of all fuel and gas. A 6′ person can stand and walk inside the fuel tanks. 2 x 64,000 litre tanks in each wing and 1 x 64,000 litre tank under seats.
5 miles of tubing
170 miles wring
3 million fasteners
Reclaimed aluminium can fetch £15,000
Finally reduced to 6m x 6m scrap/junk
By: steve rowell - 19th June 2009 at 06:23
I thought it was just another normal Garuda landing looking at those pics!!!
By: d2008 - 19th June 2009 at 04:13
Yes, I saw the “Megastructures: 747 Demolition”. They guy said you must make sure about the tanks.
By: nJayM - 18th June 2009 at 20:48
Should have watched – Megastructures: 747 Demolition – Documentary
Should watch or get a copy of Channel 5’s Documentary 30 September 2008 – “Megastructures: 747 Demolition”.
This was referred to in this section of the Forum previously http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=84793
There is always a good way and as always a yet better way in the future to do anything.
Draining fuel tanks should have been an automatic pre-cursor to demolition.
They’ll learn someday.
By: TRIDENT MAN - 18th June 2009 at 20:01
When scrapping an airliner the fuel tanks must be drained and vented,mind you when i was at Stanstead scrapping Trident 3B G-AWZU my mate thought the tanks were drained alas not……then up it went.The Stanstead fire service chaps came and put it out and said that they had been asking the management if they could burn it for years……in the end around a ton and a bit of alloy burnt.
By: PMN - 18th June 2009 at 19:34
That’s not good!
Paul