February 9, 2004 at 12:00 pm
A guy from work put together a video from a collection of footage taken on the job. It includes both the ATR and EMB-135/145. It also has in it footage taken on the VFR arrivals/departures in and out of EWR which take you up the river past the World Trade Center pre-9/11 at 1500′.
I know most here are on the other side of the pond so I don’t know if he ships that far but he does have about 15 minutes online that you can preview. Enjoy…
By: wysiwyg - 10th February 2004 at 23:34
easyJet spent a fortune on having HUD’s installed on the 737’s in order to get reduced minimums for low vis approaches however they couldn’t maintain crew recency on the system and ended up binning the idea.
By: Whiskey Delta - 9th February 2004 at 23:20
A HUD is an option on the ERJ. We don’t have them and as far as I know no other US carriers do. I believe that only European operators have opted to get them.
By: wannabe pilot - 9th February 2004 at 22:30
Am i right in thinking that the ERJ has HUD? Or am I mistaking this with the CRJ?
By: Mark L - 9th February 2004 at 21:49
Ah thanks very much, we are hard done by then! Lots of circuit breakers though 😮
By: Whiskey Delta - 9th February 2004 at 21:32
Originally posted by Mark L
Thanks for the response WD and the links to the videos. The ERJ is a very interesting plane, one that I like flying in FS quite a lot (The closest I’ll ever get 🙁 ) However one thing that I only got a few short looks at was the overhead panel. In FS we only get it portrayed as a very narrow strip, and I was wondering if you could maybe take a few photos of it, as a general overview please?Thanks,
Mark
Here you go…. not much detail, but this is what I have on my computer right now.
By: wysiwyg - 9th February 2004 at 21:01
Ren, see my response on your Tenerife thread.
By: Ren Frew - 9th February 2004 at 20:51
Originally posted by Bmused55
Hey WDYou ever seen a pic on A.net or JP.net of a flight you were actualy up front on? the picture of that nice Conti emb145 made me think
If anyone wants a picture taken of them “up front” for A.net or similar then let me know, you’ll probably have to be passing through or above GLA and in daylight (as Wys knows, lol)
My services are FOC.
By: wysiwyg - 9th February 2004 at 20:45
Fascinating, I love seeing how other manufacturers lay out their EFIS information.
By: Mark L - 9th February 2004 at 20:38
Thanks for the response WD and the links to the videos. The ERJ is a very interesting plane, one that I like flying in FS quite a lot (The closest I’ll ever get 🙁 ) However one thing that I only got a few short looks at was the overhead panel. In FS we only get it portrayed as a very narrow strip, and I was wondering if you could maybe take a few photos of it, as a general overview please?
Thanks,
Mark
By: Gaurav - 9th February 2004 at 17:27
Originally posted by Whiskey Delta
View from the top…
THis is the reason why I love flying sooooooo much
By: Whiskey Delta - 9th February 2004 at 17:22
The thing with the jetstream is once you are out of it the wind speeds drop dramatically at altitude. The winds were a lot less at lower altitudes with winds at the airport at about 10 knots. You are right though, high winds aloft and low winds at field elevation make for some tricky approaches. Those conditions are usually associated with weather fronts.
By: wannabe pilot - 9th February 2004 at 17:15
Nice pics WD! Especially the first one, I bet the passengers were happy getting there that fast! But surely, it must have been really difficult on the apporach? If you have to land into the general direction of the wind, then this must have been quite difficult as you had to turn in towards the runway?
By: LBARULES - 9th February 2004 at 15:26
Love the last pic especially but they are all great 🙂
By: Whiskey Delta - 9th February 2004 at 14:37
A bit. 🙂 It turns red at .78M and the audio alert follows at .785M. The EMB135/145 is an easy airplane to overspeed which requires a bit of attention to prevent. The newest software found in the 145XR adjusts the redline to delay the warnings to allow you to fly at max Mach (.80M) and not continously get the red warning text or aural warning.
By: Mark L - 9th February 2004 at 14:33
Nice pics, although surely in the first one the fact that the airspeed/mach number is red shows you are overspeeding?
By: Bmused55 - 9th February 2004 at 12:57
excellent photos.
I do love the flight deck snaps and any anecdotes that come with em.
Sure is windy over there! 😮
By: Whiskey Delta - 9th February 2004 at 12:49
View from the top…
By: Whiskey Delta - 9th February 2004 at 12:49
Since it wasn’t a regular visitor they didn’t have any place to put it so it was stuck out on fringe taxiway. They have a set of stairs pulled up to the aircraft so they can take on fuel for their return to YYZ (my assumption).
By: Whiskey Delta - 9th February 2004 at 12:46
Thanks to the movement of the jetstream the weather was really poor giving a good portion of the country everything from rain, freezing rain, ice pellets and snow as well as low ceilings. I’m assuming that this is what brought this visitor into CLE. We were busy with our own stuff so I didn’t get the opportunity to ask the controllers where from/why this Air Canada 744 diverted.
By: Whiskey Delta - 9th February 2004 at 12:43
Now flying west from the East coast later that night we are flying straight into the aloft winds giving us only 312 knots across the ground. 🙁 A drastic 316 knot difference from only a few hours before.