dark light

Akulas with India – speculation

….Foreign customers must have received military hardware under a major contract in last days of 2005, which explains that big discrepancy. Most experts agree that it probably was the supply of two submarines. St. Petersburg-based Admiralteyskie Verfi apparently delivered the last 636 project submarine of those five to China, each of them costing $225 million. The supply of the 971 projectโ€™s multifunctional atomic submarine could become the most sizeable purchase. The submarine was initially built for the Russian Navy in Komsomolsk-on-Amur by Amur Shipyard, a part of Shipbuilding and Boatbuilding Concern. The vessel must have been already handed to the Indian Navy after the Russian Navy formally accepted it. The first installment totaled $600, in unofficial reports. The sum and the cost of the St. Petersburgโ€™s submarine give the $825 million discrepancy between preliminary and official results for 2005……

source

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,560

Send private message

By: RayR - 9th October 2006 at 13:46

i thought i read reports of indian sailors training on the akula 2 already in russia.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

675

Send private message

By: joey - 26th September 2006 at 09:08

DUDE the second lline can give me nightmares you know?
i’d never ever trust high tech american weapons as their goreign policy is designed in such a way comes with strings attached. they have ever jamming codes for stuffs they sells to partners.
incase os russia, israel entirely diff, you can trust them period. even french is much trustable partner if u have $$$.

america opening sea wolf class? out of ur mind matt?neither they’ll do tht nor they’ll assist our ATV’s sonar VLS systems etc…it’ll be one and only russia.

i dont see why a acquisition of 40-50 odd american f18’s will change navyus decision of acquiring akula seems ODD. remember china wants them too so it’ll be either us or china.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,292

Send private message

By: matt - 25th September 2006 at 23:15

What are the chances that the congress government has made a deal not to sign up for the lease of those akulas with Russia if america opens its arms and doors to it?

ever more what are the chances that the congress government has been paid off to not lease the subs? wouldnt be the first time.

I cant even remember the current administration talking about leasing the subs!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

675

Send private message

By: joey - 25th September 2006 at 00:32

I dont think so they have came back.
btw was it confirmed they were there in russia?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

785

Send private message

By: broncho - 23rd September 2006 at 13:02

Have the submariners come back from russia? Otherwise IN doesn’t have the akulas yet.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

675

Send private message

By: joey - 22nd September 2006 at 21:36

Guys any Updates whats happening on this,
there are so so soooooooooooooooooo much talks in all forums,
did india signed this deal yes or no? is this a true or bluuf? ๐Ÿ™

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

646

Send private message

By: WisePanda - 13th March 2006 at 18:18

jokes aside, here is a report from Bellona the norweigan nuclear watchdog group about a facility being made ready to train indian n-boat crews. came out august 2005.

http://www.bellona.no/en/international/russia/nuke-weapons/nonproliferation/39412.html

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,140

Send private message

By: Blackcat - 13th March 2006 at 16:20

Blackcat you cant compare a Su to a nuke submarine , A N submarine provided you a least vulnerable way of firing your N Missile , The presence of N sub restricts enemy moment and creates constant fear and hence ties huge assets just to be in high alert.

As far as operating the Akula in secrecy is concerned , its just not mighty possible , The US and other countries has a quite good survellence on worlds ocean and you cant hide that long .

As I see no reason to hide the Akula deal when we went public with the Charlie deal quite in advance during the height of cold war.

Akula can unnerve Chinese and Pak , But heck who cares , thats why they were bought , to maintain the qualitative edge with the IN.

i do agree, but there is no need for anyone to shout that look they already got a Nukie boat out there and that we need to pump up our forces there …

I leave it there …

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 11th March 2006 at 17:20

so y cudn’t be that, an Akula really entered the Indian service way back in 2001 (as per earlier reports) and that the two (or even four) “customised” boats be entering the service in future?? …..

Blackcat you cant compare a Su to a nuke submarine , A N submarine provided you a least vulnerable way of firing your N Missile , The presence of N sub restricts enemy moment and creates constant fear and hence ties huge assets just to be in high alert.

As far as operating the Akula in secrecy is concerned , its just not mighty possible , The US and other countries has a quite good survellence on worlds ocean and you cant hide that long .

As I see no reason to hide the Akula deal when we went public with the Charlie deal quite in advance during the height of cold war.

Akula can unnerve Chinese and Pak , But heck who cares , thats why they were bought , to maintain the qualitative edge with the IN.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 11th March 2006 at 16:29

frankly, there isnt any work for any intelligence agencies to know these kinds of stuff … simply coz these are not purely military ‘programmes’ but need the political clearence and hence almost all the walls of South Block & Parliment might have heard the same … it was simply no big deal .

It was a big deal coz , Never before had some one leased a N-sub specially during the height of Cold War , Surely the west didnt took kindly to it and they would have like to know why did Indian leased a N-sub.

Insiders were always there , The ex Soviet KGB guys memories revels that India was presented as a ideal state for the KGB ofcourse the British and French had their own vested interest and ofcourse there was IB who wanted to know all about it.

Ofcourse how can one forget the paranoidness of CIA penetration during Indira’s regiem.

The above mentioned incident was specially carried by Asian Age 2 ~ 3 years back and was written by ex Admiral Nadkarni and indeed he mentioned that it was a suprise to him and Defense Minister when Groshkov presented a N-sub model.

Mate You are ofcourse free to draw your own conclusion and certainly you are as right as much as I am or any one here could be.

Blackcat I had sent you many offline messages as I dont have your email id , Please mail me your email id , Sorry for the delay and its an interview and not a article on P-75 etc

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,140

Send private message

By: Blackcat - 11th March 2006 at 16:20

Austin,

can u send me the article related to the P-75 A, B and I?? … i’ll be waiting for ur mail … tks in advance.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,140

Send private message

By: Blackcat - 11th March 2006 at 16:15

Dont get surprised if IN Akulas are patrolling the mallaca straits. no one knows.. :diablo: .. god only knows .. wait a minute .. ofcourse newly found strategic parters know apart from Russian.. rumor is that the chinese and pak people are thinking that it is russian.. offcourse akulas are not fying the flag.. damn it.. ๐Ÿ˜€

well the first report abt the Akulas coming to India was around late 2000 and that it will be in Indian waters during early 2001 ….. secondly, only a dumbhead Admiral wud put the nukies off the China coast now, when the western coast needs it the most …. thirdly …. h much can a N-powered undersea boat change the balance of power in the IOR, considering that the submarine is not just another N-submarine?? …. how much can the presence of the same N-powered Piranah make anyone to soft peddle and move forward for sweetners in IOR with the fine tuned approach of … “if u can’t beat them, join them” ….. or …. “its better to keep it off for nw” ….. what say??

for the nukies in Indian service …. take the Su-30 deal as an example ….. first we went in for the Ks so as to get accustomed with the Sukhois and its later on that the specialied Su-30MKI was to arrive ….. so y cudn’t be that, an Akula really entered the Indian service way back in 2001 (as per earlier reports) and that the two (or even four) “customised” boats be entering the service in future?? ……

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,140

Send private message

By: Blackcat - 11th March 2006 at 16:13

But it also indicates the kind of Intel the Soviets had on India and the hard work the KGB did to get it ๐Ÿ˜€

frankly, there isnt any work for any intelligence agencies to know these kinds of stuff … simply coz these are not purely military ‘programmes’ but need the political clearence and hence almost all the walls of South Block & Parliment might have heard the same … it was simply no big deal …. u also need to understand that there have been insiders which also aided the Frenchies as to the need for addition Mirages for IAF and they inturn made a good margin on that … and lastly don ever forget that the British Intelligence was never ever pulled down or the Indian Intelligence was fully revamped when India got Independence!

… it was the same Indian mercenaries which continued as the Indian inteligence (and all debacle have to be credited to them) with their links with their British daddies …. there will always be soo much into these stuff and the inter-rivalaries …. for instance, the ‘time-tested’ guys can kick out the ‘new-comers’ citing security resons etc etc, so as to keep’em off the ‘preferred line’ of their parents …. hope u got me … and don ever forget the dirty British hand in making the Northern Kashmir the buffer zone against the Soviet Influence on India! …. which we all now call as Pakistan Occupied Kashmir.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

488

Send private message

By: cinciboy - 6th March 2006 at 14:32

All I know is that my cousin’s husband (laugh here) who was a submariner and still is in fact, and was part of a certain diesel kilo sub has been posted in Russia since September and will be there for the next two years. Since his Kilo sub was upgraded 5 years ago, i fail to see why and what they are doing in that cold country.

who knows, he wont tell me. ๐Ÿ™‚

Did he tell if he has to tell you then he has to kill u. :dev2:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

105

Send private message

By: Francois5 - 6th March 2006 at 01:37

Won’t tell you because he knows the second he tells, his words will be posted here…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

927

Send private message

By: Sameer - 5th March 2006 at 22:32

All I know is that my cousin’s husband (laugh here) who was a submariner and still is in fact, and was part of a certain diesel kilo sub has been posted in Russia since September and will be there for the next two years. Since his Kilo sub was upgraded 5 years ago, i fail to see why and what they are doing in that cold country.

who knows, he wont tell me. ๐Ÿ™‚

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

927

Send private message

By: Sameer - 5th March 2006 at 22:28

The Congress and Left rejected it , The BJP was not named , so they couldnt reject it .

Lets toe the official line here , our politician are clean and dont indulge in anti-national activities or take money for personal gains ๐Ÿ˜‰

The ex KGB memories are just a bunch of lies ๐Ÿ˜€

The BJP did not yet exist in the 1970s although Advani and his boys were around the block.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

953

Send private message

By: Super Nimrod - 27th February 2006 at 22:58

…. The first installment totaled $600, in unofficial reports. The sum and the cost of the St. Petersburgโ€™s submarine give the $825 million discrepancy between preliminary and official results for 2005……

source

If they only paid ‘$600’ then I have a suspicion that it might have something to do with the missing $825million ๐Ÿ˜€ Was that used $10 bills sir ? :diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

488

Send private message

By: cinciboy - 27th February 2006 at 15:52

Dont get surprised if IN Akulas are patrolling the mallaca straits. no one knows.. :diablo: .. god only knows .. wait a minute .. ofcourse newly found strategic parters know apart from Russian.. rumor is that the chinese and pak people are thinking that it is russian.. offcourse akulas are not fying the flag.. damn it.. ๐Ÿ˜€

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

115

Send private message

By: indianbond4u - 27th February 2006 at 15:40

The Congress and Left rejected it , The BJP was not named , so they couldnt reject it .

Lets toe the official line here , our politician are clean and dont indulge in anti-national activities or take money for personal gains ๐Ÿ˜‰

The ex KGB memories are just a bunch of lies ๐Ÿ˜€

Too much to digest :D.

But one can say that russians are more sentitive to India’s needs, that any one else. Thats the gain of being second largest buyer of russian weapons.

1 2
Sign in to post a reply