August 4, 2018 at 11:46 am
By: currawong - 5th August 2018 at 06:47
Proximity to the search area perhaps?
Maybe have a look at the link, makes more sense than anything one will see in the media.
By: ZRX61 - 5th August 2018 at 05:57
Looked at an atlas lately?
Why? Is Australia no longer where Australians originate? That small island off the West coast of NZ?
By: QldSpitty - 5th August 2018 at 04:38
Be more in line for one of the USAF retrieval teams.Or what ever they are called today as JPAC was disbanded in 2015.
I know there has been a lot of work getting WW1 MIA,s found.
By: currawong - 5th August 2018 at 03:33
“I stopped reading when it mentioned the story came out of Australia. “
Looked at an atlas lately?
By: Malcolm McKay - 5th August 2018 at 03:15
It’s been well discussed here in the past – pages and pages.
By: Dave Homewood - 5th August 2018 at 02:34
I’m almost sure I read this story a couple of years ago. Or was that another couple of Aussie soldiers who found the wreckage of a polished twin aircraft in the jungle?
By: ZRX61 - 4th August 2018 at 23:58
I stopped reading when it mentioned the story came out of Australia.
By: Miggers - 4th August 2018 at 18:59
The full resume from page 1.
https://earhartsearchpng.com/earhart-lockheed-electra-search-project/
Makes for some very interesting reading.
By: J Boyle - 4th August 2018 at 17:58
Unless the parts tag or something with serials pans out, I’d still be a bit skeptical.
I just don’t trust non-aviation people’s recognition skills.
Not saying it didn’t happen or the soldiers are lying, just that there were a lot of recognition errors in the war, most by people who had training. This could be one of them.
By: currawong - 4th August 2018 at 12:27
https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/376650-amelia-earhart-png-theory.html
Makes more sense than most.