January 20, 2008 at 6:55 am
http://www.marshall.org/pdf/materials/573.pdf
Block II performance looks mighty interesting. 😮
By: sferrin - 23rd May 2008 at 13:29
New video about the SM-3 ASAT shot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDqNjnUNUl8
Apparently the flight to 153 miles altitude only took 166 seconds. 😮
By: 1MAN - 9th March 2008 at 23:29
No, you have not provided any sources. You have shown plenty that say that Russia used to have a very respectable ASAT program but you have provided absolutely nothing about current projects.
We’re talking about two different things now, I never said (not that I can’t look for it) that I could give NEW sources to Russia’s current ABM systems.
You asking for the same thing as Sefferin, I’ll have to look for it then.
By: sealordlawrence - 9th March 2008 at 23:16
Are you crasy????? go back and look at my posts.
No, you have not provided any sources. You have shown plenty that say that Russia used to have a very respectable ASAT program but you have provided absolutely nothing about current projects.
By: 1MAN - 9th March 2008 at 23:14
How can I prove your sources as wrong when you do not provide any?:rolleyes:
Are you crasy????? go back and look at my posts.
By: sealordlawrence - 9th March 2008 at 07:26
From a person how hasn’t provided ANY proof that those sourcses are flawed, comes begging for some new sorces about Russia’s modern Space weapons, ha, you YANKS are so perdictable, no prove my sources wrong.:D
How can I prove your sources as wrong when you do not provide any?:rolleyes:
By: 1MAN - 9th March 2008 at 01:05
That had crossed my mind. They also both refer to the same flawed sources and make the same false comments.
From a person how hasn’t provided ANY proof that those sourcses are flawed, comes begging for some new sorces about Russia’s modern Space weapons, ha, you YANKS are so perdictable, no prove my sources wrong.:D
By: sealordlawrence - 7th March 2008 at 01:21
I kinda think they’re the same person. They started posting (recently anyway) about the same time and they both have about the same level of maturity.
That had crossed my mind. They also both refer to the same flawed sources and make the same false comments.
By: sferrin - 7th March 2008 at 01:01
Tell me about………have you read the posts from dionis?:D
I kinda think they’re the same person. They started posting (recently anyway) about the same time and they both have about the same level of maturity.
By: sealordlawrence - 6th March 2008 at 21:37
Sealordlawrence you just don’t understand the fanboy mentality (such as it is). They can’t be bothered to back up their claims because they’re just special I guess.
Tell me about………have you read the posts from dionis?:D
By: sferrin - 6th March 2008 at 19:50
No you did not. You claimed that Russian ASAT capabilities are superior to America’s, you were then asked to back that up and you have not.
Sealordlawrence you just don’t understand the fanboy mentality (such as it is). They can’t be bothered to back up their claims because they’re just special I guess.
By: sealordlawrence - 6th March 2008 at 18:48
I gave my sources.;)
No you did not. You claimed that Russian ASAT capabilities are superior to America’s, you were then asked to back that up and you have not.
By: 1MAN - 6th March 2008 at 18:40
The point is that you have made a claim and refuse to back it up.:mad:
I gave my sources.;)
By: sealordlawrence - 6th March 2008 at 18:19
I’ve read about the Deathstar, and I won’t be suprised if U.S. had it, SO WHAT, is your point??
The point is that you have made a claim and refuse to back it up.:mad:
By: 1MAN - 6th March 2008 at 18:17
America has a death star. I dont need to provide any proof because you can not disprove it.
WHAT, is your point??
By: sferrin - 6th March 2008 at 02:53
America has a death star. I dont need to provide any proof because you can not disprove it.
Almost forgot about that. In fact that was the real reason for the USSR imploding.
By: sealordlawrence - 5th March 2008 at 22:29
If I’m a fanboy, the posts I posted would have been debunked as false, but scince it can’t, it shows just how weak your argument is.
America has a death star. I dont need to provide any proof because you can not disprove it.
By: sferrin - 5th March 2008 at 22:12
If I’m a fanboy, the posts I posted would have been debunked as false, but scince it can’t, it shows just how weak your argument is.
I doubt anybody thinks you’re worth the time to “debunk”. :rolleyes:
By: 1MAN - 5th March 2008 at 22:04
1. I’ve never claimed they don’t have them. 2. You are the one who claims they do therefore if you want to have any credibility at all you will start producing figures to back your claims. Simply saying “I don’t have to you need to prove they don’t exist” is not only childish it positively SCREAMS “I’m a fanboy”. You decide how you want others to view you here.
If I’m a fanboy, the posts I posted would have been debunked as false, but scince it can’t, it shows just how weak your argument is.
By: sferrin - 5th March 2008 at 01:24
Your post implys they don’t have them anymore, the second part f your post you imly they just “worked” on them, after reading those links if you insist they just “worked” on them, I can’t help you, your living in denile, BTW why can’t YOU just look it up your self, what the problem:confused:
1. I’ve never claimed they don’t have them. 2. You are the one who claims they do therefore if you want to have any credibility at all you will start producing figures to back your claims. Simply saying “I don’t have to you need to prove they don’t exist” is not only childish it positively SCREAMS “I’m a fanboy”. You decide how you want others to view you here.
By: SOC - 4th March 2008 at 20:37
Your post implys they don’t have them anymore, the second part f your post you imly they just “worked” on them, after reading those links if you insist they just “worked” on them, I can’t help you, your living in denile, BTW why can’t YOU just look it up your self, what the problem:confused:
There are quite a few ASAT programs that are no longer active (Skif-DM, MiG-31D, Almaz, Terra-3, to name a few). Does that imply that no more exist? No it doesn’t.