March 31, 2009 at 2:15 pm
A recent ebay purchase – The Royal Air Force Review of September 1951.
My guess by the style that this became RAF Flying Review by the mid 1950’s when I started to subscribe.
The Me110 in the film has always been intriguing..not a mock-up, but what happened to it.

A little insight here below. Was this machine scrapped or is it the RAFMus example? If scrapped can we identify it and support it with an image pre Angels?
Mark

By: northeagle - 1st April 2009 at 12:14
I think PZ865 was used along with the Portugese Hurricanes.
(LF363 was, I think, in Reach for the Sky a couple of years later.)
I think i’m right in thinking P 2617, ex 607 Squadron, veteran of battle of France and BoB, took part. I have a pic somewhere of it dressed up as US-B for the film.
Best Wishes.
Robert.
By: DazDaMan - 1st April 2009 at 11:30
I think PZ865 was used along with the Portugese Hurricanes.
(LF363 was, I think, in Reach for the Sky a couple of years later.)
By: Dave Homewood - 1st April 2009 at 11:20
Did the two UK-based Hurricanes they mentioned actually get used as well as the five from Portugal?
By: Mark12 - 1st April 2009 at 11:18
Never credited, but having had the privilege to put a few frames of 35mm under the glass, two Spitfires were used in the film – K9942 and P9444.
Mark
By: Dave Homewood - 1st April 2009 at 11:14
Very interesting article – I never realised there were so many ex-RAF chaps involved. Thanks for putting the scans up.
So, did the Battle of Britain pilots come away thing it was so accurate it could have been a documentary? Was it that well received? I personally think it’s a pretty good film.
By: bazv - 1st April 2009 at 11:05
I see the proprietor of the windmill garage was ex sgt pilot H J Goldschmidt Bsc apparently …know anything of him anybody ??
He may be a published (scientific) author !
regards baz
By: RAFRochford - 1st April 2009 at 10:59
Hi Mark….
Thanks for posting those pages from the Review! Great stuff. I know that I’ll be zipping off the the Windmill Garage to bag a bargain…although there may have been the odd price increase over the years.
…That garage is also a nice example of a bit of Art Deco architecture. There’s a great selection of some wonderful buildings from that period down the Great West Road in Brentford. I wonder if the garage is still there?
Shame about that Bf-110 being scrapped though..
Regards;
Steve
By: Arabella-Cox - 1st April 2009 at 10:46
I had never seen that shot before of the close up of the fin on which “Septic” is carried aloft.
This identifies it (or the fin, at least!) as Bf 110G-4 of GeschwStab NJG1, W.Nr 180850, 3C+BA. Captured in 1945 it was flown to Farnborough and held in the AHB’s store at Fulbeck in 1949.
It may be old news….but I had never before know the identity of that aeroplane. Now I know!
No Cees, cannot add any more although I have a lovely shot of Portugese Hurricanes arriving at Tangmere for the filming with interesting nose art.
PS……DOH….if only I had read the previous posts……!!!
By: Mark12 - 1st April 2009 at 10:33
Can we see pages 20 and 21 please? Thanks.
Here you go, Dave,


..and a page that caught my eye.
…and a couple adverts.

A 1925 ‘Red Label’ Bentley for £295, cheaper than a MG TA Tickford at £575!:eek:
To get that in proportion to the £5-10,000 Spitfire of ten years earlier, a paper round in 1953 of seven hours for seven days delivery, paid 10 shillings/50p.:)
Mark
By: Malcolm McKay - 1st April 2009 at 02:06
I think it’s the other way around -not that you’ve got the the schemes wrong, but that the original photograph is the day scheme, which has been hand retouched to colour for the nightfighter scribble for some reason. The airbrushing and treatment of the canopy in the upper of the two pics is the giveaway, IMHO.
Yep you’re right – pity they scrapped it.
By: Dave Homewood - 1st April 2009 at 01:43
Can we see pages 20 and 21 please? Thanks.
By: JDK - 1st April 2009 at 01:38
In the first pic it is wearing its standard nightfighter camo – in the second it has been altered to a day scheme.
I think it’s the other way around -not that you’ve got the the schemes wrong, but that the original photograph is the day scheme, which has been hand retouched to colour for the nightfighter scribble for some reason. The airbrushing and treatment of the canopy in the upper of the two pics is the giveaway, IMHO.
By: Malcolm McKay - 1st April 2009 at 00:07
In the first pic it is wearing its standard nightfighter camo – in the second it has been altered to a day scheme.
By: Cees Broere - 31st March 2009 at 17:04
From memory, I used to have a copy of “After the Battle” magazine which had an article on this film. The 110 was a captured one which after the war had been on a scrap heap and used for this film propped up on a wooden structure. Afterwards it was scrapped. Not the RAF Museums example, perhaps Tangmere can confirm this. The article also dealt with the loan of the Portuguese Hurricanes as well as the special effects used in the film.
Cheers
Cees
By: jeepman - 31st March 2009 at 17:03
According to War Prizes (MCP – Phil Butler)
See page 151 for picture at Eggebek with RAFM Stuka and now lost Me 109 G-14 “863”
Me 110G Wk Nr 180850
originally destined for museum display
47MU Sealand by January 46
German Air Force Equipment Centre, Stanmore Park during 1949
to Kenley 1952 ground shots Angels One Five
Scrapped