dark light

Anyone ID these A/C parts (different lot)

Thanks in advance 🙂

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7739.jpg

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7742.jpg

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7733.jpg
This bit has been in the sea – it has barnacles on it. Any ideas – wing structure?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

431

Send private message

By: *Zwitter* - 10th July 2007 at 11:40

Hi Zwitter,

Looks a close match for this section of B.17 wing lying in the Channel at 20 mtr

Regards
Ross

That looks very much like a match – especially the curved edge of the joining plate. Nice work Ross!

I’ll find out where it came from when my neighbour comes back.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

826

Send private message

By: Ross_McNeill - 10th July 2007 at 11:28

Hi Zwitter,

Looks a close match for this section of B.17 wing lying in the Channel at 20 mtr

Regards
Ross

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,395

Send private message

By: Cees Broere - 10th July 2007 at 11:26

That rules out the B-17 as well then. Also not Stirling, the spartubes are of round section. Very interesting, the partrumbers are crucial now for identification.

Cheers

Cees

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,284

Send private message

By: Whitley_Project - 10th July 2007 at 11:16

Thanks Zwitter

It’s not Whitley i’m afraid. That barrel section tube is unusual – there is no sign of any geodetics in that piece.

Your best bet is to drill out the rivets and remove the plate – a gentle blasting, a dip in altrans or some wet and dry action should reveal any surviving part numbers.

Keep us posted 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

431

Send private message

By: *Zwitter* - 10th July 2007 at 09:32

That last one looks a bit like tubular structure from the Whitley although the plate doesn’t look quite right. Any chance of some more views….

More shots as requested. Note the flattened sides of the tube section – someone must know what this was from!

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7748.jpg

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7747.jpg

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7746.jpg

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7745.jpg

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7744.jpg

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb186/zwitterfilms/IMG_7743.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,284

Send private message

By: Whitley_Project - 9th July 2007 at 22:04

That last one looks a bit like tubular structure from the Whitley although the plate doesn’t look quite right. Any chance of some more views….

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,493

Send private message

By: Lindy's Lad - 9th July 2007 at 20:37

I agree with Peter about the vent as used on Fraser Nash turrets.
The third is not from a Stirling, that one has tubular diagonal struts.
Could be either Lancaster main wing rib between the fuselage and inner
engine ……

Lancaster wing ribs in that section (either side of the no.3 and 4 fuel tanks ) have the open side of the channels in the vertical plane. That part appears to be either square section or the channel is in the horizontal plane (opposite side to that flat plate). Depandant on size too – A Lancaster wing rib at that point is pretty big – about 10cm wide at the open edge – I could just about get my hand inside (the gap is about 2 finger widths – just enough to retreive a loose captive nut….) Further outboard and the ribs become more standard in design except at the edges of the fuel tanks where extra strength is required and where the row of captive nuts sit for the (particularly heavy) fuel tank panels. If the attachment actually attaches, it shows the ribs in question. (PA474)

My guess is still firmly with a geodetic Vickers design.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

431

Send private message

By: *Zwitter* - 9th July 2007 at 19:37

no more numbers I’m afraid, but the tubing has quite distinctive flat sides if that helps. I thought maybe B17 wing, but someone else may know better.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,395

Send private message

By: Cees Broere - 9th July 2007 at 18:20

I agree with Peter about the vent as used on Fraser Nash turrets.
The third is not from a Stirling, that one has tubular diagonal struts.
Could be either Lancaster main wing rib between the fuselage and inner
engine or B-17 warren truss spar section. Any more numbers?
Don’t you just love these questions?
🙂

Cheers

Cees

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,945

Send private message

By: Peter - 9th July 2007 at 16:53

i.d.

The first one is definately a fresh air vent from a fn5 front turrett as fitted to stirlings, wellingtons, early lancasters. The second one is a mystery but the third one looks like main wing structure from a stirling? These are in great shape, is it fresh water or??

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,493

Send private message

By: Lindy's Lad - 9th July 2007 at 16:43

third one could be a bit of geodetic structure from a wellington or wellesley?

(there – clutched at that straw)

The dragonfly still exists (Restored at / by / for Flambards during the 80’s)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,370

Send private message

By: Bruce - 9th July 2007 at 16:04

Well, VZ962 is a surviving Westland Dragonfly, so the middle bit is probably from that!

Top one is a perspex mounted air vent – fitted to many types.

Bruce

Sign in to post a reply