November 18, 2002 at 12:47 pm
By: Robert Hamilton - 2nd May 2005 at 23:30
i would agree with andrewm Maderia LPMA is a nice approach can be tricky thow i find
By: Airline owner - 28th April 2005 at 15:11
GULP!!
By: Comet - 28th April 2005 at 11:25
Try Isafjordur in Iceland. I flew that for real in a Fokker 50, and it is hellish, right between a mountain side and a fjord with very little in the way of navigation help (in FS2002). The mountain looms at you as soon as you take off and you have to make some very steep turns as you climb to avoid crashing. It’s also a short runway.
By: Airline owner - 25th April 2005 at 18:23
The landing at St. Maarten is vey good but the tide is always in, so no beach but you still get a good effect.
By: SHAMROCK321 - 25th April 2005 at 09:54
I love runway 15 at BHX at night time.
By: andrewm - 24th April 2005 at 23:47
Gibraltar, low viz, no glideslope or localizer, GULP, just did it an an Airbus!
Been there done that and was even on the phone during the perfect landing in 100m vis (real world weather too 😮 😮 )
How about Maderia LPMA not thats tricky especially on your first time and not reading the charts (what are the for….?)
By: Airline owner - 24th April 2005 at 12:59
its blo0dy annoying isn’t it?!
By: adamdowley - 23rd April 2005 at 17:10
the most spectacular that ive done is chambery (aix le bains), another french alps approach. ive been led straight into a mountain by the atc on the approach before, and then you get told off for climbing to avoid it becuase you’re 300 feet above your assigned altitude.
By: paul the wall - 8th April 2005 at 18:51
Thanks I’ll try Venice, I already tried inn’s it was brill
By: Airline owner - 8th April 2005 at 17:18
I love that feeling!! When I landed at INN, I thought I was going to veer off into the mountains but I was at least 500 ft away from them each side.
By: SHAMROCK321 - 7th April 2005 at 18:20
If you like scenery try Venice. I flew DUB-VCE and started my decent over the alps. You get close to them but never close enough to think your in serious trouble.
By: Airline owner - 6th April 2005 at 16:08
I hate to say this, but I have never landed a plane in FS. I just can’t!!
I had that for 3/4 of a year and then I had a lucky land in a BA 320 and since then I’ve done around 300 landings in A340’s, A300’s, B747,757,767,777’s.
Once you land, you’ll think it was luck but believe me, you won’t crash again after. 🙂
By: LFC24 - 6th April 2005 at 13:23
I hate to say this, but I have never landed a plane in FS. I just can’t!!
By: concordesst - 31st March 2005 at 21:27
Any appraoch is good in low visibility CW Balmer, but any approach with mountains is good to. I haven’t yet tried Innsbruck i thik i’ll do it now.
By: Airline owner - 31st March 2005 at 18:12
The best landing I ever done was yesterday,…I landed my first 747. The big*phew* said it all really.
By: bmi-star - 17th March 2005 at 11:18
Gibraltar, low viz, no glideslope or localizer, GULP, just did it an an Airbus!
By: uksceneryman - 17th March 2005 at 06:33
Try Beef Island (TUPJ) – if you’ve seen the Caribbean Props Osprey book you’ll know what I mean!
Others to try:
Rio Amazonas (SESM)
Portland NAS (EGDP)
St Barthelemy (TFFJ)
Bhojpur (VNBJ)
Saba (SABA)
Paro (VQPR)
I’m certain some of these cannot possibly be true to life. SESM is probably the biggest challenge but as real as it gets? Probably not.
[Portland isn’t far off how it really is but then very few fixed wing aircraft have ever landed there.]
By: paul the wall - 16th March 2005 at 23:11
I think I might try Insbruck.
By: CWBalmer - 16th March 2005 at 21:39
Try Kathmandu in crappy low viz weather!!! Hairier than a mammoth!!! LOL!
By: BigJet - 15th March 2005 at 20:42
Insbruck deffinatly!