August 6, 2004 at 1:13 pm
Aurigny comes in for severe flak
“A Channel Island airline has been severely criticised by the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB).
It follows an incident involving an Aurigny Air Services flight between Guernsey and Stansted last November.
The ATR72 aircraft suffered severe icing causing it to roll and pitch before the pilot regained control.
The aircraft remained in service and the information in the black box flight recorder was not saved – data that may have provided valuable information.
Procedural changes
An AAIB report said the plane was carrying 13 passengers and flying over Southampton when it went into a series of rolls and pitches because ice was forming on the aircraft.
It found the plane had been “subjected to severe airframe icing”, causing it to turn and pitch.
The plane eventually landed safely at Stansted and no-one was injured.
The report also criticised the 55-year-old captain of flight ATR72 for not reporting the incident fast enough.
It said this caused the loss of valuable information about the event.
Aurigny Air Services, based in the Channel Islands, has now made changes to its post-flight accident and incident reporting procedures, the report said.
During the flight, the plane rolled 40 degrees to the left, then turned to the left before pitching up and down twice.
Steering effectiveness
A separate report by the AAIB described how a Jersey European Airways aircraft ended up with its wheels wedged in the ground off the runway at Birmingham International Airport in April this year.
The report said the captain was aware of another plane lined up for take-off and another about to land.
He had tried “to make a 90-degree left turn where the combination of speed and reduced surface friction resulted in the loss of nose wheel steering effectiveness,” the report said.
None of the 69 passengers on board the Dash-8 aircraft were hurt.
Jersey European Airways has since issued a notice to aircrew about landing procedures, highlighting that crews should not feel pressurised into carrying out a take-off due to air traffic control pressure.”
BBC News
By: DarrenBe - 8th August 2004 at 18:17
The AAIB were not criticising the crews actions in regard to the icing encounter, it was criticising the post incident actions of the Company, with regards to not securing the DFDR immediately after landing and the length of time it took for the MOR to reach the CAA.
The report is here if you want the details
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_avsafety/documents/page/dft_avsafety_030175.hcsp
By: skycruiser - 8th August 2004 at 04:09
Quite right. I wasn’t trying to say that the crew were in the clear.
I know mate, I could see an incident coming with this company unless they made some big changes in their operation.
By: Bmused55 - 7th August 2004 at 16:16
Well, its a good thing the Captain regained control.
The last ATR to go out of control because of Icing impacted the ground nose first at high speed.
By: wysiwyg - 7th August 2004 at 14:20
Therefore, they should have been twice as switched on in icing conditions to prevent this problem. I am not suprised though.
Quite right. I wasn’t trying to say that the crew were in the clear.
By: skycruiser - 6th August 2004 at 16:33
[QUOTE=wysiwyg]ATR’s are notorious for problematic airframe icing. QUOTE]
Therefore, they should have been twice as switched on in icing conditions to prevent this problem. I am not suprised though.
By: LBARULES - 6th August 2004 at 16:32
How long is it since FlyBe were known as Jersey European? Must be a very long time, they have been known as British European since, Id guess around 95/96?
By: wysiwyg - 6th August 2004 at 13:57
ATR’s are notorious for problematic airframe icing. No excuse for the lack of reporting though.