dark light

B29 'Doc' (And Other B29s)

Interesting piece in Warbirds News about the second potential B29 flyer. It is due to be rolled for engine runs late March when the weather warms up for a first flight April/May.

Will I live to see a B29 back over here?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

196

Send private message

By: DavidIsby - 22nd May 2016 at 15:20

news story on FAA certification approval for “Doc”:

http://ksn.com/2016/05/20/world-war-ii-warbird-doc-gets-faa-clearance-to-fly/

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

926

Send private message

By: DragonRapide - 20th May 2016 at 21:50

Doc’s Friends now announcing on Facebook that they have FAA approval to fly.

https://www.facebook.com/DocsFriends/?fref=nf

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

784

Send private message

By: Bomberboy - 14th May 2016 at 22:37

The CAA have never outright said no to a flying Shackleton (though BAE tried hard to make it so.)
This seems to have been accepted, and I got a rather pleasant response from the CAA and the Shackleton got added to the list of types eligible for a permit to fly.
The upcoming NDT may show up issues caused by how long 963 has been sat outside, and render the remaining spar life unusable – so its by no means a done deal.

Having paid a visit to see her recently on a ‘running’ day and seen all the hard work being put into this lovely aircraft by a good group of people, I really hope that it all comes good and that the NDT shows good results.

Back on track, I look forward to “Doc” taking to the air very soon and wonder how long it will be after that, before she is joined in the air by “Fifi”? Now that’s another interesting proposition!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,736

Send private message

By: richw_82 - 14th May 2016 at 08:50

The CAA have never outright said no to a flying Shackleton (though BAE tried hard to make it so.) When they entered preservation neither WR963 or WL790 had any fatigue data or servicing records to confirm or deny the claims made that the entire fleet was life expired… so a spar change was the only way forward.

Since then – with a lot of help and luck – the historical logs for 963 have been found and acquired. They show that the 594 hours we believed she had left is accurate.

This seems to have been accepted, and I got a rather pleasant response from the CAA and the Shackleton got added to the list of types eligible for a permit to fly.

The upcoming NDT may show up issues caused by how long 963 has been sat outside, and render the remaining spar life unusable – so its by no means a done deal.

Regards

Rich

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,720

Send private message

By: D1566 - 14th May 2016 at 07:23

Yes, my tablet has a mind of its own, turned no one into someone.
I forgot the Shack…but will the CAA let it fly?
Isn’t that why the one now in the Pima museum went to the US?

I know there are many groups working independently on various types.
I’d like to see them pull together for the common good and try to complete an airframe.

What groups, apart from WR963 and ‘Just Jane’?
Believe that the WR963 group have had successful discussions with the CAA.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 14th May 2016 at 01:36

Yes, my tablet has a mind of its own, turned no one into someone.
I forgot the Shack…but will the CAA let it fly?
Isn’t that why the one now in the Pima museum went to the US?

I know there are many groups working independently on various types.
I’d like to see them pull together for the common good and try to complete an airframe.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

337

Send private message

By: Supermarine305 - 14th May 2016 at 01:26

Read that comment again. Either Boyle is referring to WR963 or he wrote ‘someone’ instead of ‘no-one’.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

784

Send private message

By: Bomberboy - 14th May 2016 at 01:03

Too bad someone in the UK (aside from Just Jane) is working on a project to return a large multi to flight.

Have you forgotten the Coventry Avro Shackleton WR963 then?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 14th May 2016 at 00:56

Nice to see a group getting something accomplished.

Too bad someone in the UK (aside from Just Jane) is working on a project to return a large multi to flight.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

17,958

Send private message

By: charliehunt - 13th May 2016 at 09:04

Well that’s a helluva beautiful sight and a beautiful sound!! All the hard work and they are inching closer to that first flight for 60 years!!;)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,130

Send private message

By: Zac Yates - 12th May 2016 at 23:26

Great news, and I have to admit to grinning with glee when I saw it start moving!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

196

Send private message

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

196

Send private message

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

784

Send private message

By: Bomberboy - 27th March 2016 at 00:58

WHO are notorious for plagiarizing other sources, often well out of date, and rehashing it under their own byline as ‘news’

I’m with you on this and is the reason I don’t look at anything that I can see with their name on or attached to it!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

197

Send private message

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,675

Send private message

By: Sabrejet - 9th January 2016 at 19:31

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/b-29-superfortress-fly.html?src=fba&type=wca&page=who

Reported elsewhere back in September 2015.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

196

Send private message

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,892

Send private message

By: trumper - 16th December 2015 at 14:17

Well done them but gobsmacked it has to stay outside all winter,that can’t do it any good.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

197

Send private message

By: ian_st - 16th December 2015 at 10:51

Doc’s December 2015 Update

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWht11iGIeA

1 3 4 5
Sign in to post a reply