August 16, 2006 at 8:40 am
COME ON BA SORT IT OUT.
4/7 LHR flights canx today, & we only yesterday started receiving LGW services again.
The “tighter security” reason is starting to look like a lame excuse.
Not the first time down the years BA has singled out ABZ for major disruption, we always seem first in line for delays & canx.
Shows BA’s “commitment” to ABZ…NOT! 😡
By: OneLeft - 17th August 2006 at 10:05
BA’s loss bmi’s gain????
Well yes. But elsewhere I’m sure BA will be picking up pax from cancelled bmi flights. And VS will be picking up BA pax, and bmi VS pax and so on…
1L.
By: Richard Taylor - 17th August 2006 at 08:02
BA’s loss bmi’s gain????
(Unless bmi go on strike, as seems possible!! :rolleyes: )
By: OneLeft - 16th August 2006 at 21:22
How come BMI are still managing to operate all there flights to ABZ
It is up to each airline which 20% of their operation they cancel. Presumably they chose to cancel other routes.
1L.
By: Craigston_Tom - 16th August 2006 at 18:52
COME ON BA SORT IT OUT.
4/7 LHR flights canx today, & we only yesterday started receiving LGW services again.
The “tighter security” reason is starting to look like a lame excuse.
Not the first time down the years BA has singled out ABZ for major disruption, we always seem first in line for delays & canx.
Shows BA’s “commitment” to ABZ…NOT! 😡
ABZ had all the LGW flights today, and they were all ontime. As for LHR, you said that 4 out of the 7 flights were cancelled.
It is slowly but surely getting back to normal, as tomorrow, only BA1305 to LHR is cancelled and the 6 other flights are so far estimated to be operating to schedule. By Friday 18th August, all 7 departures to LHR are scheduled to be running.
How come BMI are still managing to operate all there flights to ABZ, is that because they run a much smaller operation from LHR than BA?
By: bmi-star - 16th August 2006 at 15:51
How long is a piece of string?
It really depends on whether the increased security stays in place, and how well the BAA cope with it. As long as they need a 20% reduction in the operation I imagine domestics will always be prone to cancellation.
1L.
OK, well with 2 hours transit @ LHR to HKG, lets hope that’ll be plenty of time eh!
By: Airline owner - 16th August 2006 at 14:02
im flying LGW – MAN – LGW on the 26th and 27th!! i hope theyre all done and back to normal by then
By: OneLeft - 16th August 2006 at 14:02
Any idea when the SHT’s will be fully up and running 1L?
How long is a piece of string?
It really depends on whether the increased security stays in place, and how well the BAA cope with it. As long as they need a 20% reduction in the operation I imagine domestics will always be prone to cancellation.
1L.
By: lukeylad - 16th August 2006 at 13:10
things are back to normal at ncl just easyjet been there normal late self and jet2 who i now call the new easyjet at ncl hah are doing great./
By: LBARULES - 16th August 2006 at 13:04
I’m flying MAN-LHR on BA1389 next Wednesday! Hope they are fully back to normal.
By: bmi-star - 16th August 2006 at 12:24
Any idea when the SHT’s will be fully up and running 1L? I’m supposed to be transting @ LHR with BA in 2 weeks
By: OneLeft - 16th August 2006 at 10:05
The problem is that the BAA have instructed all airlines operating at LHR to reduce their operations by 20% (it was 30% initially), and to a lesser extent at LGW, while they struggle to cope with the new security restrictions.
As passengers on domestic routes have the option of using surface transport they are a prime candidate for cancellation. All of the domestic routes have been affected. No-one has singled out ABZ. Once the BAA gets its act together, or the restrictions are lifted then I’m sure things will start to get back to normal.
1L.