dark light

  • Cking

BA MAN to JFK. The end

Sad news on the Beeb

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/7689015.stm

What they don’t mention is the twenty two BA engineers that have been told they don’t have jobs at MAN any more:mad:

Rgds Cking

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

457

Send private message

By: David Kerr - 1st November 2008 at 15:10

Lets be honest, the hub system is more profitable for the airline and allows them to serve many more cities.

Guess which clown of an airline when given a terminal partially funded by themselves wanted to ramp up operations so that they could have a small hub operation here but instead flew the white flag of surrender after 3 years.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 31st October 2008 at 21:53

Lets be honest, the hub system is more profitable for the airline and allows them to serve many more cities.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,866

Send private message

By: Hand87_5 - 31st October 2008 at 12:38

Well you know AF has the same silly hub strategy.
They used once to fly LYS-JFK , Nice-JFK.

Now one has to connect at this awful CDG hub.:mad:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

222

Send private message

By: carl727uk - 31st October 2008 at 12:21

I remember the ex B-Cal DC-10 doing flights to the Caibbean in BA colours, the twice weekly 747 flight BA118 to Islamabad and a 747 cargo flight (can’t remember the destination). And was it the DC-10 that did NY before the 767 or was it a TriStar?

I flew BA MAN-JFK once, that was a Tristar.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

457

Send private message

By: David Kerr - 28th October 2008 at 19:08

How long did BA use 767’s on JFK route.

I think it was around 17 years or so – they used to rotate the 767s on a LHR shuttle every month or so. THen 1993, we had the dedicated BA Regional fleet of 3 767s and a 757 (G-BNWN, G-BWNO and G-BNWU for the 767s, G-BPEC (I think?) for the 757). Our favourite tech aircraft of all time (G-BNWH) may have taken over the duties from around 1995 up to 2006.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,035

Send private message

By: tommyinyork - 27th October 2008 at 22:43

How long did BA use 767’s on JFK route.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

318

Send private message

By: JetSet - 27th October 2008 at 18:28

I’m sure there was a regular 747 cargo that lasted a season or 2 that routed either via Gatwick or Prestwick. Then again I might be imagining it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

457

Send private message

By: David Kerr - 26th October 2008 at 19:23

I remember the ex B-Cal DC-10 doing flights to the Caibbean in BA colours, the twice weekly 747 flight BA118 to Islamabad and a 747 cargo flight (can’t remember the destination). And was it the DC-10 that did NY before the 767 or was it a TriStar?

The Barbados and Orlando services were both 2 weekly 747s routing up from Gatwick. Never had 747Fs operating on a regular basis (think it was no more than 5 “charters” to Atlanta).

It was L1011s to JFK which then became DC10s (routing from LGW) then 747s (routing from LGW) before becoming the proper offering ex-MAN two-class 767s (J30 Y 183) which seemed to have served them so well before the embarrassment of having profitale regional long-haul ops saw them go to the 3 class 767 and become “uneconomic”. On another forum it’s reported that premium passenger numbers were not in decline but very steasy and “lots of people routing MAN-LHR-JFK”, then with the closure of the MAN base i.e. sold to Flybe, crewing costs increased quite a bit. They willed it to make a loss, and verily it came to pass.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

318

Send private message

By: JetSet - 26th October 2008 at 09:28

I remember the ex B-Cal DC-10 doing flights to the Caibbean in BA colours, the twice weekly 747 flight BA118 to Islamabad and a 747 cargo flight (can’t remember the destination). And was it the DC-10 that did NY before the 767 or was it a TriStar?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

901

Send private message

By: B77W - 25th October 2008 at 14:31

Sad news indeed – It sure was nice to see it on spotting/photography trips.

Why don’t they just rename them London Airways.

I wonder how many of your 880 posts aren’t rants or flight info req’s.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,035

Send private message

By: tommyinyork - 25th October 2008 at 10:48

Why don’t they just rename them London Airways.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,282

Send private message

By: FLY.BUY - 24th October 2008 at 21:23

Sad for all really, as a kid I remember the VC-10’s plying this route from RINGWAY.

Sign in to post a reply