May 22, 2009 at 10:23 am
BA nosedives into massive losses
British Airways has announced the biggest loss since the company was privatised in 1987.
BA reported a loss before tax of £401m for the year to 31 March, after seeing its results hit by a weak pound and higher fuel costs.
BA made a revised profit of £922m in the previous year.
Although revenues increased to almost £9bn, BA faced a near-£3bn fuel bill. Chief executive Willie Walsh said he saw “no signs of recovery anywhere”.
Fuel costs rose 44.5% after the price of oil soared last year. The weaker pound also contributed to rising costs as fuel is bought in US dollars.
The results included redundancy-related costs of £78m.
BA said it had cut more than 2,500 jobs since last summer and added that it was in talks with unions about “pay and productivity changes”.
“The prolonged nature of the global downturn makes this the harshest trading environment we have ever faced and, with no immediate improvement visible, market conditions remain challenging,” Mr Walsh said.
By: Schorsch - 26th May 2009 at 16:24
Good airlines don’t go bust in hard times. The time period 2008/2009 is one of the most problematic, as it had seen preposterous fuel prices and a sharp decline in demand, especially in business travel.
BA may have announced losses, we don’t know about cash flow. Announcing huge losses is normally no direct threat, I guess the board also uses these losses as leverage versus the unions.
I guess they have pretty healthy background, like many big fishes in Europe. Their American counterparts have much worse backing.
However, there gonna be casualties and it will not be funny.
By: OneLeft - 26th May 2009 at 16:10
Knock the 270m fine off
Total (various) fines for the year were £478m.
1L.
By: englishrob - 26th May 2009 at 14:26
Knock the 270m fine off and you are down to a 131m loss…and every other employee is made to suffer!
Plus the reported cost of the T5 move and subsequent chaos was a cool £160 million PLUS subsequent loss of revenue.(conservative guess £5million) means we should and could have made a profit 😡
By: englishrob - 26th May 2009 at 13:46
Yes I agree OneLeft, all the fines accrued by our fine management give these figures a false reading. 😡
Re the management trying to impose new T&C’s, we’re in the middle of a ballot that should reject all the new proposals which are totally unacceptable. 😡
By: OneLeft - 24th May 2009 at 18:28
Actually Mr Walsh has announced he is working for no pay in July, as are some of his other executives. I knwo it’s only one month, but to give up 1/12th of your pay isn’t a bad statement.
What WW and ONE of his executives are doing is saying to the workforce we’ve given something up now you’ll have to too.
The difference is that what he wants the workforce to give up is terms, conditions and salary for good, not for one month or even the two years he’s been offered, constantly rejecting the various unions’ offers of short term solutions for a short term situation. To put this into context in some departments he is looking for the equivalent of £6000 per head in savings, the vast majority of that coming directly from peoples salaries, and I’m talking from salaries of £15-20K, not the top end earners.
Also lets not forget that without the £478m in various fines this year we would have made a profit, and that’s without him continuing to pay the salaries of the managers dismissed over the fines because, surprisingly, they can’t find new jobs. Then there’s the managers made redundant with sizeable pay-offs then employed a week later as consultants at three times the cost, then the cost of the T5 opening farce, etc., etc., etc., etc…..
1L.
By: Tartan Pics - 24th May 2009 at 11:29
Okay okay I’ll say it…………..
And this is their results in the first successful year since rebranding themselves as London Airways😀
By: rdc1000 - 23rd May 2009 at 20:51
Most likely the next set of results will be good resulting in Willie and his crew getting their bonuses back while the workers will have been tricked into accepting pay reductions.
Good on BALPA for calling the bluff.
Actually Mr Walsh has announced he is working for no pay in July, as are some of his other executives. I knwo it’s only one month, but to give up 1/12th of your pay isn’t a bad statement.
By: OneLeft - 23rd May 2009 at 18:05
Does this include the virgin cartel charges?
I believe so, along with all the other fines and costs our illustrious leaders have incurred in the last year.
1L.
By: abutcher1985 - 23rd May 2009 at 14:35
Does this include the virgin cartel charges?
By: B77W - 23rd May 2009 at 12:21
At least they’re not broke like a certain UK airline… 🙁
By: forester - 23rd May 2009 at 10:01
This surely is a fuel price hedging problem. The underlying performance is quite good compared to other airlines. BA avoided the worst of the fuel price surge earlier by hedging and now the same device results in paying over the odds when the price falls.
Most likely the next set of results will be good resulting in Willie and his crew getting their bonuses back while the workers will have been tricked into accepting pay reductions.
Good on BALPA for calling the bluff.
By: Pato - 22nd May 2009 at 20:50
😮 And people thought bmi’s losses were bad?