By: Mark L - 21st February 2004 at 13:58
By: Mark L - 21st February 2004 at 13:53
Its the one that has been targeted. There are 3 BA flights to IAD and 1 to BWI a day and only the 223 has been targeted. One possibility is that it is purely the significance in the flightnumber, and so BA have nothing to lose with changing it to 293.
By: Jeanske_SN - 21st February 2004 at 13:11
WHAT IS WRONG WITH 223
By: Mark L - 21st February 2004 at 13:08
Well they would find out soon enough by looking at the timetables!
By: Britannia - 21st February 2004 at 11:21
typical BA
Yep, just let everbody know:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
By: A380!! - 21st February 2004 at 11:15
typical BA:rolleyes:
By: Britannia - 21st February 2004 at 09:32
Well now, that should confuse any terrorists, huh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well it was on the news aswell:D 😀 😀
By: robc - 21st February 2004 at 08:19
I think 223 was the resolution giving Israel its own state or if not a very large one dealing with Israel-Palestine.
By: steve rowell - 21st February 2004 at 03:45
Re: BA223 changing to BA293
Originally posted by Britannia
Next month BA223 is changing to BA293
Well now, that should confuse any terrorists, huh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By: Jeanske_SN - 20th February 2004 at 21:59
SO?
wasn’t flight 223 the one that flew into the Pentagon?
By: Mark L - 20th February 2004 at 21:55
Its about Palestine I think, emailing you again Andrew 🙂
By: andrewm - 20th February 2004 at 19:58
What is resolution 223 about? Aviation? Iraq??
Mark drop us an email pls to my bt address u have cos Outlook packed up AGAIN and I got more details for you 😀
By: Mark L - 20th February 2004 at 19:03
Becasuse they recon its to do with UN Resolution 223, thus changing it to 293 will remove the political connection.
By: T5 - 20th February 2004 at 18:53
Is there any point to it? Whatever happens, it’s still going to be the same flight to Washington, departing at the same time!
:rolleyes:
Sign In
February 20, 2004 at 6:52 pm