March 23, 2017 at 5:45 pm
Everyone ok
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7NX26OU0AA04kb.jpg
From
https://twitter.com/flyingdutchwx/status/843114173898866690/photo/1
Strong old birds 🙂
https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20170317-0
By: Stratofreighter - 29th March 2017 at 05:06
The footage at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roULJ1sfyuw
…seems to show that C-FKGL
is flying again! 😮
DC3T ferry flight after crashed on Pickle Lake
By: J Boyle - 28th March 2017 at 01:58
Wasn’t the DC3 designed with this sort of accident in mind,
i.e. the wheels protrude giving the underside protection in the event of a wheels up?
Or is that a myth?
Not just the DC-3, many 1930s types….the Beech 18 and B-17 among them.
By: Arabella-Cox - 27th March 2017 at 19:33
That’s correct, h98.
However, wheels protruding or not, the props and engines would still be badly affected.
Anon.
By: hampden98 - 27th March 2017 at 19:03
Wasn’t the DC3 designed with this sort of accident in mind,
i.e. the wheels protrude giving the underside protection in the event of a wheels up?
Or is that a myth?
By: Piston - 27th March 2017 at 06:02
The PT-6 is a free turbine engine.
You can quite literally start the thing while holding the propeller steady.
That being said. There are still a series of inspections that will need to be complied with.
Excellent point regarding the engine mounts. At least a real good visual.Andy
It’s a free turbine yes, but you’re living in a land of make believe if you think you can hold a blade steady on start up (Ex PT6 engineer).
By: Zac Yates - 26th March 2017 at 21:22
A quick Google suggests the 2012 price was around US$800,000-US$955,000 each.
By: ericmunk - 26th March 2017 at 18:53
Which would cost more than the value of the hull?
Those will be extremely expensive engines then…
By: DH82EH - 26th March 2017 at 18:01
The PT-6 is a free turbine engine.
You can quite literally start the thing while holding the propeller steady.
That being said. There are still a series of inspections that will need to be complied with.
Excellent point regarding the engine mounts. At least a real good visual.
Andy
By: Arabella-Cox - 26th March 2017 at 17:06
I don’t know what the situation is with turbine engines re-shock loading after multiple blade strikes.
With piston engines, if one blade is dinged/struck then the engine just requires inspection for fitness to re-fly. If two or more blades (on the same engine) are damaged then the engine has to come out and be subjected to a stripdown, examination and crack testing of the crankshaft.
Obviously, turbine and piston engines are fundamentally different and I wonder what the situation is, and what damage would/could be done in such a situation as on this aircraft. I’d think the engine mounts would need a good looking at too as a lot of the stress would be transferred through to the structure.
Anon.
By: AlanR - 26th March 2017 at 16:08
Engines could be OK ?
By: Newforest - 26th March 2017 at 15:09
Which would cost more than the value of the hull?
By: Brenden S - 26th March 2017 at 12:41
2 new engines and props and she should be good to go.