dark light

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,008

Send private message

By: Stratofreighter - 29th March 2017 at 05:06

The footage at

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roULJ1sfyuw

…seems to show that C-FKGL
is flying again! 😮

DC3T ferry flight after crashed on Pickle Lake

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 28th March 2017 at 01:58

Wasn’t the DC3 designed with this sort of accident in mind,
i.e. the wheels protrude giving the underside protection in the event of a wheels up?
Or is that a myth?

Not just the DC-3, many 1930s types….the Beech 18 and B-17 among them.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 27th March 2017 at 19:33

That’s correct, h98.

However, wheels protruding or not, the props and engines would still be badly affected.

Anon.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,685

Send private message

By: hampden98 - 27th March 2017 at 19:03

Wasn’t the DC3 designed with this sort of accident in mind,
i.e. the wheels protrude giving the underside protection in the event of a wheels up?
Or is that a myth?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

239

Send private message

By: Piston - 27th March 2017 at 06:02

The PT-6 is a free turbine engine.
You can quite literally start the thing while holding the propeller steady.
That being said. There are still a series of inspections that will need to be complied with.
Excellent point regarding the engine mounts. At least a real good visual.

Andy

It’s a free turbine yes, but you’re living in a land of make believe if you think you can hold a blade steady on start up (Ex PT6 engineer).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,130

Send private message

By: Zac Yates - 26th March 2017 at 21:22

A quick Google suggests the 2012 price was around US$800,000-US$955,000 each.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,519

Send private message

By: ericmunk - 26th March 2017 at 18:53

Which would cost more than the value of the hull?

Those will be extremely expensive engines then…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

561

Send private message

By: DH82EH - 26th March 2017 at 18:01

The PT-6 is a free turbine engine.
You can quite literally start the thing while holding the propeller steady.
That being said. There are still a series of inspections that will need to be complied with.
Excellent point regarding the engine mounts. At least a real good visual.

Andy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 26th March 2017 at 17:06

I don’t know what the situation is with turbine engines re-shock loading after multiple blade strikes.

With piston engines, if one blade is dinged/struck then the engine just requires inspection for fitness to re-fly. If two or more blades (on the same engine) are damaged then the engine has to come out and be subjected to a stripdown, examination and crack testing of the crankshaft.

Obviously, turbine and piston engines are fundamentally different and I wonder what the situation is, and what damage would/could be done in such a situation as on this aircraft. I’d think the engine mounts would need a good looking at too as a lot of the stress would be transferred through to the structure.

Anon.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,556

Send private message

By: AlanR - 26th March 2017 at 16:08

Engines could be OK ?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 26th March 2017 at 15:09

Which would cost more than the value of the hull?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

206

Send private message

By: Brenden S - 26th March 2017 at 12:41

2 new engines and props and she should be good to go.

Sign in to post a reply