dark light

  • Geforce

BC-17X

Does anyone have information about the civil version of the Boeing C-17? Could this beat Antonov’s leading position in cargo transport? I wonder if it will be as expensive as the original C-17A.

Attachments:
http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c9db89107579f21.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,815

Send private message

By: mongu - 27th March 2002 at 20:39

RE: BC-17X

No, but if a middle eastern leader was seen eating a Pretzel they’d bomb his country to punish the little a-rabs.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

140

Send private message

By: shauny2k1 - 27th March 2002 at 15:27

RE: BC-17X

Do the yanks class Pretzels as a weapon of war? Seen as Bush had to go to hospital I’m surprised that there has been no war against pretzels or something. I’m gonna stop now, seen as I’m visiting the US on Monday.

Shaun

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,317

Send private message

By: Rabie - 26th March 2002 at 22:12

RE: BC-17X

😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

woringly they would

rabie :9

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,815

Send private message

By: mongu - 26th March 2002 at 21:20

RE: BC-17X

The yanks classify anything as a weapon of war – they probably think spaghetti sauce is classified (because it means a potential enemy can feed his soldiers healthy and nice food, thereby increasing efficiency and boosting morale).

Didn’t they try and restrict Windows 95 a while back?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,150

Send private message

By: coanda - 25th March 2002 at 15:58

RE: BC-17X

according to literature the C17 in all of its derivatives are classed as weapons of war(by the american government) and are therefore not available for sale to any civilian company, or indeed to most countries militaries.

this is why the c17 didnt get past civil proposal level, because it would make a damn fine heavy lift/outsize cargo aircraft this to me tho would suggest that call for said aircraft would be low.

a point of interest. the RAF C17 has just been confirmed as being able to take two tornadoes(minus wings)almost straight to the falklands with a stop off for fuel in ascension!!

coanda

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,866

Send private message

By: Hand87_5 - 25th March 2002 at 09:36

RE: BC-17X

Rabie ,

As far as I know FedEx is mainly operating MD11F

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,815

Send private message

By: mongu - 24th March 2002 at 21:57

RE: BC-17X

Well, if the US gov’t wants the ability to requisition the aircraft from FedEx, then presumably they will pay half the cost?

That might sweeten the pot a bit for FedEx.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,317

Send private message

By: Rabie - 24th March 2002 at 20:50

RE: BC-17X

boeing and DOD wnat people like Fed Ex to buy it so they can mobilse them to MAC (or whatever its now called) in event of war for more eairlift caperbility.

nice idea but will people like fed ex move away from 747s

rabie :9

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,805

Send private message

By: Geforce - 24th March 2002 at 17:04

RE: BC-17X

comes from Boeing
Attachments:
http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c9e071aa52a655f.html

Sign in to post a reply