November 1, 2007 at 8:55 pm
The Bristol 191 was intended as the Royal Navy ASW version of the Belvedere (Type-192) and was developed from the Type-173 with uprated engines and modified under carriage etc etc. According to ‘Vanguard to Trident’ (Eric J Grove) 68 had been ordered to fulfill half of the RN’s ASW aircraft requirement. This leaves me a with a number of questions,
1)Why in the late 50s was it cancelled in favor of the Whirlwind, there are some suggestions of development difficulties although only 3 were built and they were all static (I dont know the validity of the last piece of information)?
2)Was it intended to be operated from ships? The types size and layout rather suggests that it would have been somewhat awkward for shipborne use?
3)Does anybody have any details about the equipment fit or appearance? Pictures of any form, artists impressions etc etc, would be very greatly appreciated!?
Thank you in advance sealordlawrence.
Edit: I have just found the below linked website, states that a shortened fuselage and folding rotor blades would have been used enabling it to be used with standard carrier deck lifts.
If anybody has any pictures or images of any sort it would be great to see them!
http://avia.russian.ee/helicopters_eng/bristol-173.php
By: pagen01 - 3rd November 2007 at 18:00
Don’t get me wrong SLL, I think the 173 was a looker as a Heli bus, and the final Belvedere looked good, especially in camo.
It Just dosen’t look right as a serious shipbourne ASW platform.
By: sealordlawrence - 2nd November 2007 at 14:09
Nice set of photos.
Can’t help thinking it would have taken quite a time to stow the rotor blades and that framework to hold them might need a crane? Still it was a prototype.
Roger Smith.
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that they are wooden blades, it may be the case that with metal blades (as the Belvedere had in service) such structures to support them may not have been required?:confused:
By: RPSmith - 2nd November 2007 at 14:01
Nice set of photos.
Can’t help thinking it would have taken quite a time to stow the rotor blades and that framework to hold them might need a crane? Still it was a prototype.
Roger Smith.
By: sealordlawrence - 2nd November 2007 at 13:14
There was an old British adage, ‘if dosen’t look right…’. That dosen’t look right! Cracking pictures mind.
The Whirlwind / Wessex must have been more attractive in that they took up less of the valuable deck and hanger space, and were tried and tested (even if slightly unreliable in early forms).
I always thought that there was something elegant about the 173 family, especially in the polished metal form of the prototypes, although from some angles it does look ‘too long’.
By: pagen01 - 2nd November 2007 at 12:42
There was an old British adage, ‘if dosen’t look right…’. That dosen’t look right! Cracking pictures mind.
The Whirlwind / Wessex must have been more attractive in that they took up less of the valuable deck and hanger space, and were tried and tested (even if slightly unreliable in early forms).
By: sealordlawrence - 2nd November 2007 at 12:36
Thanks for the replies everyone, especially the pictures, the 173 looks smaller on a carrier than I had expected it to!
By: FiltonFlyer - 2nd November 2007 at 11:15
Here are a few photos of the prototype 173 (now in the Bristol Aero Collection) on board HMS Eagle for deck trials.


These images are taken from http://www.aviationarchive.org.uk, a great source of images of Bristol aircraft. I am sure I have a photo somewhere of a development 191, I’ll have to dig around though.
Andy
By: alertken - 2nd November 2007 at 10:50
Your sources are M.Uttley, Westland & Br Heli’ Industry, Cass,2001, 071465194X, and R.G.Bedford,RAF Rotors, SFB,1996, 190063600X.
A shunt, double-Sycamore was funded as T.173. In 1951 RN was thrust to NATO’s fore, convoy protection/ASW. Light Fleets to become ASW platforms for Gannet AS.1/4. RNVR onshore to man Seamew AS.1, and RAFVR, MR.2 in Coastal Command, whose Regulars would have long-loiter Nomad/Avro 716 and Short PD.2 flying boat. FAA twin-engine helos close-in at sea: Bell 61 HSL-1 under MSP. Fails; T.191/Napier Gazelle instead. RCN interest in T.193; and RAF, T.192 as first foray in Army support.
Bristol drift. ASW rethink. Delete most of the above, and odd airborne underwater weapons like Nozzle. Rotary ASW, sought since Hoverfly trials, is made nearly real by (W)S.55. USN funds ASW S.58; licenced as Wessex, single Gazelle, with a (modest) load. RN sketches hunter-killer helo-pairs; hopes for access to US Mk.101 Lulu nuclear depth charge. Outcomes are Wasp on the back of some vessels, trialled even with WE.177(NDB)!; Wessex HAS.1/3 on larger ones and the carriers. RAF was stuck with Bristol drift, containing the pain to just 26, in Service Sept.’61 (ITP,1947!) and enjoying >3 decades of Wessex HC.2. Announced reason for dumping T.191 was cross-operation USN (and French Navy). But it was an inflammatory monstrosity: see RAF Rotors for engine start procedure – the right front seat as a commode for a pot of AVPIN. See blow back. See double-dumping.
By: wieesso - 1st November 2007 at 21:26
Guess you know this already…
http://www.filton.flyer.co.uk/bristol/prod191.html
‘Serial XG354 was allocated to an airframe used as a ground test-rig. Three series 3 aircraft were ordered with the Leonides Major driving four-bladed rotors and with a taller rear pylon. They were XE286-8 (G-AMYF-H) but only the first had begun ground running in November 1956 when work on the type was stopped. The RAF remained interested in the design and this led to the Type 192 Belvedere.’
http://www.vicflintham.co.uk/post-war-research-aircraft-and-prototypes/Helicopters.html
‘A Mark 3 prototype – XE286 – built at Weston Super Mare first flew on 9 November 1956. This featured 850 hp Alvis Leonides engines, taller rear pylon, shorter fuselage and longer stroke landing gear – anticipating a Royal Navy order for what was to be known as the Bristol Type 191.’
http://glostransporthistory.visit-gloucestershire.co.uk/Rotors.htm
By: pagen01 - 1st November 2007 at 21:02
I have seen pictures of one of the Bristol twin rotarys (believe a 173) aboard a British carrier (again unsure which). could this have been in relation to the above mentioned trials.
The helicopter wasn’t an immediate success as a carrierborne ASW platform, which is why 814 Sqn had to carry on operating Gannet AS.4s for a while longer than planned.
edit, It was a 173, on HMS Eagle