October 28, 2011 at 5:10 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15492607
Why not have the Lords elect the new King/Queen every time? Following ancient Germanic custom …
Why have ze Haus of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha as a monopolistic purveyor of Kings and Queens to the throne? And how does that go together with EU competition laws and regulations?? :diablo:
By: Lincoln 7 - 29th October 2011 at 19:54
Al, So thats the REAL reason they built Hadrians Wall?:diablo:
Jim.
Lincoln .7
By: Al - 29th October 2011 at 12:21
Don’t know yet about the latest crop, but the fillies of the Saxe-Coburg und Gotha line have always had more balls than their menfolk anyway.
Just keep them all south of the border…;)
By: paul178 - 29th October 2011 at 09:01
The Queen and Duke have given us years of service and I am very proud of them. I would however like to see young blood on her demise.Sorry Charles and Camilla bu you do not “cut the mustard” with me!
By: PeeDee - 29th October 2011 at 01:22
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15492607
Why not have the Lords elect the new King/Queen every time? Following ancient Germanic custom …
Why have ze Haus of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha as a monopolistic purveyor of Kings and Queens to the throne? And how does that go together with EU competition laws and regulations?? :diablo:
The Lords cannot be trusted!!
I don’t see a problem with the existing system. So, why change?
By: ppp - 28th October 2011 at 18:53
Non-job anyway
Just pick some random old lady with a nice wave