March 11, 2015 at 5:09 pm
I was surprised to see this Buchon at the new Toulouse Aeroscopia museum today. I assume it’s D-FMBB?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235867[/ATTACH]
By: Sabrejet - 12th March 2015 at 17:24
In case it’s of use/interest, I just looked at the photo I took of the info board next to this ‘109’ and it says it’s ex-C.4K-21, an HA 1109 and used in the film Battle of Britain.
By: JohnTerrell - 12th March 2015 at 16:38
I like the silver too – it allows one to appreciate the aircraft in respect only to mechanical design. The first photos I ever saw of it, I thought it looked really quite pretty, and sleek, rather than the menacing brute it usually appears to be when painted in military camouflage and markings.
By: WebPilot - 12th March 2015 at 14:59
I’ve got to agree with the “yes to silver” camp – I think it looks fantastic. The silver finish gives it an almost Art Deco look.
By: Bob - 12th March 2015 at 14:56
Would the first 109s off the line have been naked of any camouflage? Bit like K5054?
I think it lets the true design of the aircraft shine, rather than be subtly changed by varying patterns of paint. Shades of the Mercedes Silver Arrow…
Just my thoughts – at least it hasn’t been polished to a mirror finish as seems to be the current trend with some owners.
By: Sabrejet - 12th March 2015 at 14:32
Recommended – even more so the Ailes Anciennes trove next door!
By: Moggy C - 12th March 2015 at 07:56
Damn. I passed Toulouse yesterday, not knowing about this museum.
Moggy
By: Dave Homewood - 12th March 2015 at 05:51
You’re all wrong, it clearly says on the side it is an Airbus.
:stupid:
By: redvanner - 11th March 2015 at 23:02
I was just thinking the opposite – it looks quite nice in that finish…
I am with Bob on this one. Interesting how differently we can see the same object. In my opinion the silver takes a lot off the somewhat agressive look of the 109.
By: mike currill - 11th March 2015 at 22:09
Am I the only one thinking that a ‘109 of any sort just doesn’t suit silver??
Spitfire? Yes.
Mustang? Yes.
Hurricane? Yes.
‘109? No.
Dunno why.
I have to agree there. It just doesn’t look right somehow.
By: Bob - 11th March 2015 at 22:05
I was just thinking the opposite – it looks quite nice in that finish…
By: DazDaMan - 11th March 2015 at 21:37
Am I the only one thinking that a ‘109 of any sort just doesn’t suit silver??
Spitfire? Yes.
Mustang? Yes.
Hurricane? Yes.
‘109? No.
Dunno why.
By: Sabrejet - 11th March 2015 at 20:01
Well well! Many thanks for the info. Most intriguing.
By: JohnTerrell - 11th March 2015 at 19:53
As you mention, Michael, it is the same G-2 static example that the Messerschmitt Stiftung/EADS/Airbus Group own, which is in addition to their three flying examples.
More photos of it here (previously with EADS decals, now replaced with Airbus Group decals):
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Hispano-HA-1112-Bf-109G-2/1992751/L/
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Hispano-HA-1112-Bf-109G-2/1993083/L/&sid=631d81fba17f204495ed4a9f666fc23b
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Hispano-HA-1112-Bf-109G-2/1809224/L/&sid=631d81fba17f204495ed4a9f666fc23b
By: redvanner - 11th March 2015 at 18:54
[QUOTE=Sabrejet;2208763]I was surprised to see this Buchon at the new Toulouse Aeroscopia museum today. I assume it’s D-FMBB?
Sabre, I very strongly doubt it. Messerschmitt Stiftung (or EADS or Airbus Group) whatever they are calling themselves nowadays, has / owns 3 flying (potentially airworthy) 109 G-s. 1 G-4, D-FMWE, Red 7 (airworthy at the moment, 1 G-6, D-FMBB, FM+BB waiting for major overhaul, disassembled at the moment, 1 G-10, D-FDME, Yellow 3 (formerly known as Black 2), under repair (waiting for engine, will be airworthy when engine is fitted. And they do have a 4. 109, a G-2. This one is purely static, lives in a container and visits airshows and other places by road in a trailer. And it is silver all over. So chances are very high, that the above pic shows their No. 4 109. BTW no registration number, as it is static, not registered at all and bears no number, C/N: 54 . FYI all of the G´s were converted from former Spanish airframes, though not all were Buchons. The 3 (potentially) airworthy ones were, though the above, static one was converted from a Tripala (Hispano-Suiza engined HA- 1109 K 1 L.
Michael