dark light

  • Peter

can anyone ID this engine?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWiLjegw9iQ

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,409

Send private message

By: Trolly Aux - 7th February 2007 at 17:14

hmmm now the collector ring discharges the correct side so the engine must be correct side up so we need to work out a carb that is DD and would fit the 1340

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,409

Send private message

By: Trolly Aux - 7th February 2007 at 17:10

lucky we know everything 1340:eek:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 7th February 2007 at 17:06

MMM – see what you mean – dont see how he dealt with the carb either – the trunking doesnt extend that far

AFAIK you cannot alter the crank location and as you say, the scoop on top, rather than underneath suggests its inverted

They’ve mackled up a four bladed prop for it too..

What a strange carry on!

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,409

Send private message

By: Trolly Aux - 7th February 2007 at 17:00

TT, I cant work it out because the carb would have to be re fitted, or its a down draft and not the Harvard type BUT can you alter the crank access to be handed ie right?, sump is not a problem it looks like he is running the dry sump system so no probs

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 7th February 2007 at 16:53

Yeah! I wondered about that which means that the sump is on top!!!

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,409

Send private message

By: Trolly Aux - 7th February 2007 at 16:38

1340 but hand crank the wrong side so maybe he is running the engine upside down hence the air intake on the top !!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 7th February 2007 at 16:34

Definitely Pratt and Whitney Wasp
(ID by rocker covers, cylinder shape and hand crank start)

Either 985 or 1340 – difficult to tell from this angle – hand crank suggests 1340

Cheers

TT

Sign in to post a reply