September 9, 2008 at 12:38 pm
This story has popped up a few times today.
Arab policy makers in the Persian Gulf are turning to eccentric plans in their quest for an alternative shipping route for about a fifth of the world’s oil transported through the Strait of Hormuz.
Dubai, home of the Middle East’s largest-container port within the Gulf, is the latest Arab sheikdom to study projects to bypass the Hormuz shipping lane that’s vulnerable to Iranian attack.
According to a senior Dubai government official, planners have proposed building a giant canal across the desert that could handle the huge oil tankers and freight ships that currently sail through Hormuz.
If built, the channel would rival the existing Suez and Panama canals as a major conduit for world sea-trade and crude oil shipment. But the costs of such a project, estimated by industry experts familiar with the plans to be in excess of $200 billion, could be prohibitive.
“Many studies on this have been presented but nothing is solid,” said the senior Dubai-government official, who declined to be identified.
But the fact that such a grand plan exists demonstrates how concerned Gulf Arab leaders have become by the Iranian threat to their main trade route. The Islamic republic’s repeated assertions to close Hormuz if its nuclear research plants are attacked by Israel, or the U.S., have been a major factor in driving oil prices higher over the past year.
Crude oil is down about 25% since its $147.27 peak on July 11 when tension between Iran and the U.S. peaked.
One of the world’s most important oil choke points, the 50-kilometer-wide Hormuz channel, conveys about 17 million barrels a day of Gulf crude, or roughly two-fifths of all oil shipped by sea.
“It would definitely ease market concerns and would lower the insurance premium currently paid by tankers passing through Hormuz,” said Manoucheher Takin, senior analyst at the Center for Global Energy Studies in London.
The premium for vessels carrying 300,000 metric-tons of crude at a value of $32 million from Kuwait through the Persian Gulf to Europe is equivalent to $24,000 for the entire voyage, according to Lloyds Underwriters.
Iranian Threat
Tensions are rising between Iran and Arab states in the Gulf amid a smoldering territorial dispute between Tehran and the United Arab Emirates over the ownership of islands in the Persian Gulf.
This builds on an already tense situation as Iran faces off with the U.S. and its allies over the Islamic republic’s quest to enrich uranium and develop nuclear power plants.
“Iran has clearly stipulated its intention to close the Strait of Hormuz in case of a military conflict in the region,” said Mustafa Al Ani, a senior advisor at Dubai-based think tank Gulf Research Center.
Defending the strait is currently a major preoccupation of the U.S. Fifth Fleet in the Gulf, where the largest U.S. naval force in the region has an armada of vessels including nuclear aircraft carriers ready to counter Iran.
Iran’s military, the largest in the Gulf, presents a formidable adversary, however.
Shipping in the Gulf is vulnerable to attack because of Iran’s long coastal waters, a fact painfully demonstrated in 1987 when the Islamic republic targeted commercial vessels with ease in what became known as the “tanker war”.
Other Routes
Dubai isn’t alone in looking into building a canal to link the Persian Gulf with the open sea.
Neighboring emirate Ras Al Khaimah, one of seven semiautonomous sheikdoms in the U.A.E., considered a plan to build a shorter canal across the Hajar mountain-range to the country’s east coast but was put-off by its vast cost, according to a Dubai-based engineering consultant familiar with the proposal.
Meanwhile, plans that emerged last year to build a storage center for liquefied natural gas outside the Gulf and the Hormuz channel remain on the drawing board.
People close to the proposed Dubai plans told Dow Jones that the canal would follow a route of about 180 kilometers from the emirate’s northern Gulf coast to the East coast port of Fujairah.
The scale and cost of the canal venture is unlikely to deter Dubai’s rulers who have an appetite for vast infrastructure projects. These include the world’s tallest skyscraper; the construction of three Palm-shaped Islands in the Gulf that are visible from space and the world’s largest airport currently under construction.
To be sure, the economics of such a canal are largely untested and the vast cost of building the link could make the project unfeasible, or as Global Energy’s Takin says “it’s not certain if the benefits would justify the costs.”
Pipelines could provide a more cost-effective alternative to Hormuz.
Dubai’s richer cousin Abu Dhabi, holder of the world’s fifth-largest oil reserves, is building a pipeline linking its oil fields with Fujairah, conveniently bypassing Hormuz. The link will have the capacity to carry about 1.5 million barrels a day of crude oil and feed an export refinery.
But this pipeline would only carry U.A.E. oil, leaving producers such as Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq still without an alternative shipping route to Hormuz.
By: PMN1 - 9th September 2008 at 17:54
A bit more from the times
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/markets/the_gulf/article4710599.ece
September 9, 2008
Dubai plans $200bn canal to bypass Strait of Hormuz
David Robertson
Dubai is studying plans to build a $200 billion (£114 billion) mega-canal that would allow oil tankers to bypass the Strait of Hormuz. The Gulf emirate is understood to be considering the idea as a means of reducing Iran’s influence on the flow of oil from the region.
About 17 million barrels of oil a day are transported through the strait, equivalent to 40 per cent of the world’s traded oil.
However, the proposed canal project would be fraught with difficulty. Oil tankers weighing more than 300,000 tonnes would need a route through the mountainous region between Dubai and its Indian Ocean coast.
“Many studies on this have been presented, but nothing is solid,” a senior official of the Dubai Government told Dow Jones yesterday
Iran has hinted repeatedly that, if threatened, it would target commercial vessels in the strait. The navigable tanker lanes are only six miles wide and any disruption could severely limit oil exports from the Gulf.
Engineers are understood to have presented the plans for a 112-mile canal to the Dubai Government. It would link the Gulf coast with the port of Fujairah on the Indian Ocean coast, crossing the Hajar Mountains with a network of enormous locks. The massive cost and complexity of the project is thought to have stalled a decision on the canal, but it could be a popular initiative with other Gulf states.
Iran’s location on the northern coast of the Strait of Hormuz effectively allows it to control the 90 per cent of Gulf oil that is exported by sea. Countries such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq are eager to find an alternative and could be persuaded to contribute to the project.
Mustafa Alani, of the Dubai-based think-tank Gulf Research Center, said: “Iran has clearly stipulated its intention to close the Strait of Hormuz in case of a military conflict in the region.”
Abu Dhabi is building a pipeline to Fujairah so its oil can avoid Hormuz. It will carry about 1.5 million barrels a day, but will not have the capacity to transport oil from Saudi Arabia or other producers.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article4710766.ece
September 9, 2008
Real value in pricey Gulf canal project
David Wighton: Business editor’s commentary
Dubai excels at projects that require more money than common sense (the world’s largest indoor snow resort, for example) but perhaps the ultimate swaggering demonstration of wealth is the proposal to build a canal across the emirate’s mountainous hinterland.
The project to link the Gulf with the Indian Ocean would cost more than $200 billion (£114 billion) but reduce journey distances by only about 100 miles.
The Suez and Panama Canals were built so ships did not have to circumnavigate entire continents. The Dubai to Fujairah channel would merely cut off the tip of Arabia.
The canal would, however, allow ships to avoid the Strait of Hormuz and avoid Iran’s influence over that treacherous stretch of water.
More than 90 per cent of the Gulf’s oil, which accounts for 40 per cent of the world’s traded supplies, must be transported through the Strait every day and Iran has made clear it will block the channel if threatened.
This would obviously be bad for oil consumers but it could turn ugly for Gulf producers so a $200 billion insurance policy might look attractive to states such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq.
As for the staggering sum involved, $200 billion is only what the United States is willing to pay to bail out its sickly mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Given the need to secure oil supplies from the Gulf, this canal could turn out to be just as economically important as supporting the US mortgage market. Perhaps we should all chip in.
By: SOC - 9th September 2008 at 17:51
If Iran wants to start something in the Gulf, then a little canal like this isn’t going to do a single thing. If they used a pipeline to send oil and gas to a refinery well outside the Gulf, like in Yemen for example, now we’re talking. But this does nothing whatsoever, and that’s probably why it remains a “pipe dream”. In fact, it was probably brought up to make it appear that leaders were trying to protect their country’s resources, getting prices to trend back upwards.