April 8, 2011 at 4:40 am
By: Arabella-Cox - 11th April 2011 at 19:09
David
I understand where you are coming from. Although underwater footage (not just the scans) show the aeroplane in a remarkable state of preservation the fact of the matter is that it will obviously need a great deal of conservation/stabilisation once it is out of the water – and I would suspect that will be on ongoing if not permanent state of affairs.
A massive project all round.
By: David Burke - 11th April 2011 at 18:57
Tangmere -my consideration was purely on the exposure of aluminium and the oxidation process ! Whilst it would be great to think something recognisable and in good or restorable order could emerge I still think thats unlikely! Looking at the RAFM’s past record I would rather they speak to fresh water salvors to see what could fill some holes in the RAF ‘missing’ types list.
By: silver fox - 10th April 2011 at 22:36
I would like to think that this aircraft can be be recovered more or less intact, however having seen what tides and shifting sand did to a modern car in just 6 months I won’t be holding my breath.
Like many others I will still wish any recovery attempt the best of luck.
By: David Burke - 9th April 2011 at 18:42
I think people need a reality check ! This is an aluminium aircraft in wet sand ! Its going to fall apart as soon as its lifted out of that sand at a rate of knots.
By: trumper - 9th April 2011 at 18:36
RyanAir used 40 of them 😉 😀
ROFL 😀 Do you have to pay extra to get both engines running 🙂
By: Rlangham - 9th April 2011 at 17:42
A “Nazi passenger jet…” “In almost perfect condition…”
No wonder that rag has earned the soubriquet “Daily Fail”… :rolleyes:
Although it’s quite surprising they got one of their pet subjects wrong, considering it’s other soubriquet the “Daily Heil”
By: J Boyle - 9th April 2011 at 17:03
RyanAir used 40 of them 😉 😀
Don’t give them any ideas.:eek:
By: ZRX61 - 9th April 2011 at 16:26
:)Just out of interest how many Do 17’s are there in a reasonable or complete state.
RyanAir used 40 of them 😉 😀
By: Bruce - 8th April 2011 at 18:17
It is upside down.
I would suggest that although it is in one piece, corrosion is likely to be significant. Restoring it would remove a huge amount of original material, so I believe it is better to leave well alone. It will be a big enough job to stabilise it once it is raised.
Bruce
By: brewerjerry - 8th April 2011 at 18:13
Hi
A shame it is not going to be restored,hopefully in the future a german or norwegian museum will find one then we will get a fully restored example.
cheers
Jerry
By: JT442 - 8th April 2011 at 18:12
“some damage to the cockpit area….” I’d say that it looks upside down..!
By: DazDaMan - 8th April 2011 at 18:07
Great footage of it. I take it the plan is to bring it up eventually?
By: Mahone - 8th April 2011 at 17:46
A couple more images and some video here….
By: David Burke - 8th April 2011 at 17:32
Maybe they should recover the P-38 at Harlech first as a bit of practice!
By: trumper - 8th April 2011 at 16:45
Thanks ,i did suspect so but thought maybe there was one somewhere,or should i say hoped.
Still strange how non survived,makes this even more important.
By: jeepman - 8th April 2011 at 16:34
:)Just out of interest how many Do 17’s are there in a reasonable or complete state.
Shame they couldn’t save them from Finland in the 50’s.
Approximately none