June 22, 2009 at 12:41 pm
http://rnzaf.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Airshows&action=display&thread=2447
Looking at these pics, I really can’t understand why nothing is being
done to the remains.
it’s a long way away but wouldn’t any of the wingsections be usable to the Stirling project?
Cheers
Cees
By: David Burke - 25th June 2009 at 18:36
Bit like the old RAF gate guard Spitfires and Hurricanes or the large number of aircraft at museums ‘preserved’ outside in Europe?
By: Cees Broere - 25th June 2009 at 18:26
Dream on.
The Chatham Islanders consider the wreck to be part of their history, and would react quite adversely if there was any suggestion of removal.
They are rough-and-tough guys ( and the women are even more so), and any salvage party are likely to end up as bait in the local crayfish pots.
Fair enough, 😉
But leaving things to rot outside for decades doesn’t show much interest in preserving these components.
Just my view:cool:
Cees
By: flyernzl - 25th June 2009 at 10:36
Dream on.
The Chatham Islanders consider the wreck to be part of their history, and would react quite adversely if there was any suggestion of removal.
They are rough-and-tough guys ( and the women are even more so), and any salvage party are likely to end up as bait in the local crayfish pots.
By: GrahamF - 22nd June 2009 at 20:45
CHATHAM ISLAND SHORT SUNDERLAND
http://rnzaf.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Airshows&action=display&thread=2447
Looking at these pics, I really can’t understand why nothing is being
done to the remains.
it’s a long way away but wouldn’t any of the wingsections be usable to the Stirling project?Cheers
Cees
Wouldn’t it be great for the Rochester MAP boys with the Shorts connection and wouldnt it be good if the remains were barged into Chatham dockyard
[ next town to Rochester Kent ] get it!
Graham
By: hindenburg - 22nd June 2009 at 18:25
http://rnzaf.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Airshows&action=display&thread=2447
Looking at these pics, I really can’t understand why nothing is being
done to the remains.
it’s a long way away but wouldn’t any of the wingsections be usable to the Stirling project?Cheers
Cees
Sadly the wings are completely different.
By: Willow - 22nd June 2009 at 18:16
Sadly, despite being of similar construction, the wing has a different cross-section and would be unusable in a Stirling project.
However, if any other former members of the Duxford Sunderland crew fancy a challenge I’m sure this one would keep us busy for a while…….
Cheers
Willow
By: Merlin Madness - 22nd June 2009 at 16:36
Now thats just sacrilege:mad:
By: 12jaguar - 22nd June 2009 at 14:50
Is that a booking for here then?
19th / 20th June 2010 – Cockpit or a rig?:diablo:
You naughty man:D
By: TwinOtter23 - 22nd June 2009 at 14:37
… That cockpit would sure be impressive at Newark next year though:diablo:
Is that a booking for here then?
19th / 20th June 2010 – Cockpit or a rig?:diablo:
By: 12jaguar - 22nd June 2009 at 13:23
hi Cees
If the Project will pay my way, I’ll go and survey it myself!
seriously though, I may be wrong, but I don’t think that the wings are that similar between the types, I stand to be corrected though. That cockpit would sure be impressive at Newark next year though:diablo: