September 3, 2015 at 3:50 pm
CHINA unveils ‘Guam Express’ advanced anti-ship missile
Charles Clover in Beijing
Three weeks ahead of President Xi Jinping’s visit to Washington, China unveiled several new anti-ship missiles at a military parade in Beijing, forcibly demonstrating that America’s undisputed maritime power was under threat.
Analysts who had been expecting to catch the first public glimpse of the DF-21D “carrier-killer” missile were not disappointed. The missile — for which there is no reliable defence — has been in development since 2011. Its unveiling on Thursday ended weeks of suspense among the global army of specialists who track Beijing’s defence technology breakthroughs.
For all that, however, the missile itself was not seen. Just a launch tube on a motorised carriage with “DF-21D” stencilled on the side was displayed. The main objective of including it in the parade appeared to be symbolic.
Experts were more excited by an offhand comment by the parade announcer, who said that an even more advanced anti-ship missile was already in deployment.
The DF-26 missile, an advanced intermediate-range ballistic missile with a range of 3,000km to 4,000km, had already been fitted with an anti-ship warhead, according to the parade announcer.
“While an ASBM [Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile] version of the DF-26 was predictable, that it is already a deployed system is quite a shock,” said Rick Fisher, Senior Fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center in Washington.
The announcer also said the DF-26 was capable of targeting “medium-size ships”, meaning that both US aircraft carriers and their escorting destroyers would be vulnerable.
The longer range of the DF-26 — the DF-21D can only reach 1,500km — means it is capable of reaching the so-called “second island chain” in the western Pacific Ocean, all the way to the US base on Guam.
“A Chinese ability to attack reinforcing US naval forces with precision strikes out to Guam clearly undermines US security guarantees in our multiple Asian alliances, and our implicit security guarantees to Taiwan,” said Mr Fisher.
Patriotic Chinese took to Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, to boast about the weaponry on display, calling the DF-26 “the Guam Express”.
Some analysts say such missiles threaten to consign aircraft carriers — which form the basis of US naval strategy — to the dustbin
http://m.ft.com/cms/s/0/8847ddd0-5225-11e5-8642-453585f2cfcd.html
By: Jonesy - 5th September 2015 at 20:24
Are you certain of that totoro?. I’ve seen the reports from NASA of what’s in orbit….couple of 3 bird ELINT constellations and a smattering of strip-scan recce birds. We’ve seen a few different strategic-sized UAV designs but no indication of squadron strength deployment and no apparent rush to ramp up SATCOM bandwidth in theatre to support big UAV ops. Manned marpat types are being bought, but, again I’ve not seen big numbers talked about on order….and there’s still no publicly recognised Chinese SURTASS equivalent.
6yrs down the track from Pinkos debate above there doesn’t really seem to have been a huge advance in PLAN/PLANAF basin search/track capability?. At face value of course!
By: totoro - 5th September 2015 at 15:07
the components are there. one can only debate how effective they might be in various circumstances against targets at various locations. and that’s way too many variables. anything can happen.
By: Jonesy - 5th September 2015 at 13:53
Fantastic!. One of the 368 threads where I patiently….nearly….explained the very long range kill-chain problem. Is it your contention that a declaration of the missiles existence means that the components missing 6 years ago are now present…but being kept mysteriously under wraps?
By: Y-20 Bacon - 4th September 2015 at 00:34
ASBM is a classic topic in the past 10 years. Like many other Chinese military technologies, it’s widely debated, which resulted in many of my posts account in this board. And hope this official announcement will finally settle down many debates in last decade which till now still open, like the below one, the earliest such debate I can retrieve from the board’s archive
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?81521-PLA-(All-Forces)-Missiles-2/page8
do you want a cookie now?
By: Pinko - 3rd September 2015 at 16:19
ASBM is a classic topic in the past 10 years. Like many other Chinese military technologies, it’s widely debated, which resulted in many of my posts account in this board. And hope this official announcement will finally settle down many debates in last decade which till now still open, like the below one, the earliest such debate I can retrieve from the board’s archive
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?81521-PLA-(All-Forces)-Missiles-2/page8