dark light

CHINAGRAPH

A look at the PR9 thread got me thinking.

The most useful item of equipment in aviation is the Mk I eyeball.

The second most useful item is probably the Mk I Chinagraph. It has been around so long in aviation that I feel it truly deserves recognition in Historic.

In the RAF, I saw more airborne and groundborne uses of this one piece of equipment than I can remember. On radar screens, on windows, on the galley wishlist, on bonedomes etc, etc.

Since then I have also seen them used in a similar fashion on Police aircraft.

Come on forumites, tell us of your grease-pencil stories. But, do try and keep it clean. 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,048

Send private message

By: wessex boy - 25th July 2006 at 08:22

Come on forumites, tell us of your grease-pencil stories. But, do try and keep it clean. 🙂

The Met Officer at Shawbury getting so annoyed with student Pilots/Crewman calling him for an ‘actual’, he came down to the Squadron crewroom, drew a square on the window in Chinagraph, and wrote ‘Actual’ above it and then flounced back whence he came….

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 22nd July 2006 at 06:38

Oops. Tsk, tsk tsk… Newforest – When lifting text it is considered polite & perhaps ethical to attribute the source – you know, acknowledging the work of others. 😡

JAMES K JAMES K[COLOR=Lime]JAMES KJAMES K

Apologies, apologies, apologies. As you can see, the ‘blue box’ doesn’t get reproduced on a quote from a quote. The quote was abbreviated for clarity and the source was not quoted, oops, oops 😮 but following the thread from the beginning should make the source obvious.

Papa Lima.

Physics was not my strong point!.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 22nd July 2006 at 05:06

NASA never asked Paul C. Fisher to produce a pen. When the astronauts began to fly, like the Russians, they used pencils, but the leads sometimes broke and became a hazard by floating in the [capsule’s] atmosphere where there was no gravity. They could float into an eye or nose or cause a short in an electrical device.

Could the ‘lead’ in a pencil, which is not a metallic substance cause an electrical short? :confused:

Oops. Tsk, tsk tsk… Newforest – When lifting text it is considered polite & perhaps ethical to attribute the source – you know, acknowledging the work of others. 😡

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,315

Send private message

By: bazv - 22nd July 2006 at 04:54

I hope I am remembering correctly but I seem to recall looking inside a late model Canberra (E15 or T17 ?) in the 70’s and seeing multi coloured blades on a cooling fan caused by somebody (bored Nav ?) holding chinagraphs against the rotating blades. 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,888

Send private message

By: Papa Lima - 20th July 2006 at 16:52

Graphite is a good conductor and used for brushes in electric motors and dynamos.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 20th July 2006 at 16:49

NASA never asked Paul C. Fisher to produce a pen. When the astronauts began to fly, like the Russians, they used pencils, but the leads sometimes broke and became a hazard by floating in the [capsule’s] atmosphere where there was no gravity. They could float into an eye or nose or cause a short in an electrical device.

Could the ‘lead’ in a pencil, which is not a metallic substance cause an electrical short? :confused:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

681

Send private message

By: LesB - 20th July 2006 at 16:29

The Yanks (NASA) spending millions on researching a pen that was suitable for space use – while the Ruskies quietly carried on working with pencils…

Which were soon cancelled because of the danger to the electronics (and fire etc) from floating particles of wood and graphite dust . . . which was why Fisher (not NASA) developed the pen.

From Snopes . . . .

NASA never asked Paul C. Fisher to produce a pen. When the astronauts began to fly, like the Russians, they used pencils, but the leads sometimes broke and became a hazard by floating in the [capsule’s] atmosphere where there was no gravity. They could float into an eye or nose or cause a short in an electrical device. In addition, both the lead and the wood of the pencil could burn rapidly in the pure oxygen atmosphere. Paul Fisher realized the astronauts needed a safer and more dependable writing instrument, so in July 1965 he developed the pressurized ball pen, with its ink enclosed in a sealed, pressurized ink cartridge. Fisher sent the first samples to Dr. Robert Gilruth, Director of the Houston Space Center. The pens were all metal except for the ink, which had a flash point above 200°C. The sample Space Pens were thoroughly tested by NASA. They passed all the tests and have been used ever since on all manned space flights, American and Russian. All research and developement costs were paid by Paul Fisher. No development costs have ever been charged to the government.

Shame to shoot down a nice bit of yank bashing, innit!

:rolleyes:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

99

Send private message

By: Macfire - 19th July 2006 at 21:38

The Yanks (NASA) spending millions on researching a pen that was suitable for space use – while the Ruskies quietly carried on working with pencils…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

175

Send private message

By: F4MPHIXER - 19th July 2006 at 19:10

The inspector circling proud or cocked rivets on the Airbus A320 wing production line!!!!! Always in RED!!!!

Sign in to post a reply