March 12, 2012 at 2:46 pm
I have been trying to identify the combustion chamber and flame tube parts shown below, but without success. I’ve tried contacts with the Rolls-Royce Heritage Trust without success so far. Does anyone recognise these components and what engines they were from? I should add that I can’t guarantee these are from British-built engines although it is likely that they are.
Any information would be gratefully received.
By: RadarArchive - 15th March 2012 at 20:47
I think we have a winner! Wow – thanks for that Wyvernfan. A Python had never occurred to me, but it is a clear match both in the combustion chamber and the flame tube. Thanks again!
By: RadarArchive - 15th March 2012 at 20:47
I think we have a winner! Wow – thanks for that Wyvernfan. A Python had never occurred to me, but it is a clear match both in the combustion chamber and the flame tube. Thanks again!
By: Wyvernfan - 15th March 2012 at 18:51
The Armstrong Siddeley ASX / Python also had slim combustion chambers of that design.
Pete
AS Python 3 combustion chamber..
By: Wyvernfan - 15th March 2012 at 18:51
The Armstrong Siddeley ASX / Python also had slim combustion chambers of that design.
Pete
AS Python 3 combustion chamber..
By: MerlinPete - 14th March 2012 at 08:08
Here are some not very good pictures.
I`m still not altogether sure.
Pete
By: MerlinPete - 14th March 2012 at 08:08
Here are some not very good pictures.
I`m still not altogether sure.
Pete
By: RadarArchive - 13th March 2012 at 22:11
Just as an aside, your Goblin flame tube looks remarkably like the one in your Proteus cutaway.
I know what you mean. I do think our one is Goblin and the photo below of a Goblin engine shows the inside and outside of flame tubes quite well. This does seem to be a pretty good match to our example.
I hadn’t realised there were different flame tubes in Proteuses. If you are able to find a photo of a Proteus showing the same time of flame tube as in our example, I would be very grateful. It would just be nice to confirm that this is indeed Proteus and not something else.
By: RadarArchive - 13th March 2012 at 22:11
Just as an aside, your Goblin flame tube looks remarkably like the one in your Proteus cutaway.
I know what you mean. I do think our one is Goblin and the photo below of a Goblin engine shows the inside and outside of flame tubes quite well. This does seem to be a pretty good match to our example.
I hadn’t realised there were different flame tubes in Proteuses. If you are able to find a photo of a Proteus showing the same time of flame tube as in our example, I would be very grateful. It would just be nice to confirm that this is indeed Proteus and not something else.
By: MerlinPete - 13th March 2012 at 19:24
Thanks for the responses. I think number 4 is Derwent, as it matches the dimensions of another Derwent tube we have. I am unsure about the proteus, if only because the drawing below seems to show a very different type of flame tube. It may well be Proteus, but it would be great if anyone has a really good photo of a cutaway Proteus showing the flame tube just to make sure.
Thanks again for all the information so far which has been tremendously helpful.
Just as an aside, your Goblin flame tube looks remarkably like the one in your Proteus cutaway.
I`m not at all sure about the Proteus, but I am quite sure that the combustion chambers on some of them had those distinctive steps, rather than a smooth tapered diameter. They didn`t all have the same chambers by the way, there is more than one type.
I`ll have a look at work tomorrow for a picture.
The Armstrong Siddeley ASX / Python also had slim combustion chambers of that design.
Pete
By: MerlinPete - 13th March 2012 at 19:24
Thanks for the responses. I think number 4 is Derwent, as it matches the dimensions of another Derwent tube we have. I am unsure about the proteus, if only because the drawing below seems to show a very different type of flame tube. It may well be Proteus, but it would be great if anyone has a really good photo of a cutaway Proteus showing the flame tube just to make sure.
Thanks again for all the information so far which has been tremendously helpful.
Just as an aside, your Goblin flame tube looks remarkably like the one in your Proteus cutaway.
I`m not at all sure about the Proteus, but I am quite sure that the combustion chambers on some of them had those distinctive steps, rather than a smooth tapered diameter. They didn`t all have the same chambers by the way, there is more than one type.
I`ll have a look at work tomorrow for a picture.
The Armstrong Siddeley ASX / Python also had slim combustion chambers of that design.
Pete
By: ZRX61 - 13th March 2012 at 17:13
That 2nd on in the first post looks like my BBQ lighter 🙂
By: ZRX61 - 13th March 2012 at 17:13
That 2nd on in the first post looks like my BBQ lighter 🙂
By: RadarArchive - 13th March 2012 at 14:09
Thanks for the responses. I think number 4 is Derwent, as it matches the dimensions of another Derwent tube we have. I am unsure about the proteus, if only because the drawing below seems to show a very different type of flame tube. It may well be Proteus, but it would be great if anyone has a really good photo of a cutaway Proteus showing the flame tube just to make sure.
Thanks again for all the information so far which has been tremendously helpful.
By: RadarArchive - 13th March 2012 at 14:09
Thanks for the responses. I think number 4 is Derwent, as it matches the dimensions of another Derwent tube we have. I am unsure about the proteus, if only because the drawing below seems to show a very different type of flame tube. It may well be Proteus, but it would be great if anyone has a really good photo of a cutaway Proteus showing the flame tube just to make sure.
Thanks again for all the information so far which has been tremendously helpful.
By: MerlinPete - 12th March 2012 at 21:51
I agree with you on No1.
No2 looks like a Derwent MkI, is the MkII similar?
I don`t know what a Goblin flame tube looks like, but there must be plenty of people on here who certainly do.
No4 looks like a later (Mk5 or 8) Derwent to me, but could equally well be a Nene, as Anon pointed out, I`m guessing on that.
I`m somewhat out of my depth when it comes to jet engines, as has been noted on this forum previously!
Pete
By: MerlinPete - 12th March 2012 at 21:51
I agree with you on No1.
No2 looks like a Derwent MkI, is the MkII similar?
I don`t know what a Goblin flame tube looks like, but there must be plenty of people on here who certainly do.
No4 looks like a later (Mk5 or 8) Derwent to me, but could equally well be a Nene, as Anon pointed out, I`m guessing on that.
I`m somewhat out of my depth when it comes to jet engines, as has been noted on this forum previously!
Pete
By: Arabella-Cox - 12th March 2012 at 17:25
Derwent V?
The Derwent V tube looks a little too squat though it may be the camera angle/perspective. Could it be Nene?
Just my two penn’orth.
Anon.
By: Arabella-Cox - 12th March 2012 at 17:25
Derwent V?
The Derwent V tube looks a little too squat though it may be the camera angle/perspective. Could it be Nene?
Just my two penn’orth.
Anon.
By: RadarArchive - 12th March 2012 at 16:24
Pete,
That’s great, thanks. No suprise that you recognised the Welland flame tube! May I ask can you check the following to make sure that I’ve identified them correctly? I believe they are as follows:
Combustion chamber 1: Avro Canada Orenda
Combustion chamber 2: Rolls-Royce Derwent II
Combustion chamber 3: de Havilland Goblin II flame tube
Combustion chamber 4: Rolls-Royce Derwent V
Thanks again for identifying the other two.
By: RadarArchive - 12th March 2012 at 16:24
Pete,
That’s great, thanks. No suprise that you recognised the Welland flame tube! May I ask can you check the following to make sure that I’ve identified them correctly? I believe they are as follows:
Combustion chamber 1: Avro Canada Orenda
Combustion chamber 2: Rolls-Royce Derwent II
Combustion chamber 3: de Havilland Goblin II flame tube
Combustion chamber 4: Rolls-Royce Derwent V
Thanks again for identifying the other two.