January 14, 2001 at 4:33 pm
i’ve herd rumors that concord is having a test flight before
it goes back into full service somtime in aprill.
does anyone know if this is true and if so when it is?
By: Arabella-Cox - 29th January 2001 at 06:38
RE: concord test flight
I don`t know what the fuzz is about, concord flew safely for decades,and when I saw
an item on the news about the AF test flight,I saw all of the paris fire-trucks starding
by on the side of the runway.
But………are they going to do that every time concord will take off????
they don`t do that kind of stuff when a 747 takes off do they?????
and there have been more incidents/accidents with the 747??
I think that everyone is over-reacting!
Get concord back in the air tomorrow and you`ll see that it was really an ACCIDENT!!!
Keep on flying CONCORD
By: SOC - 27th January 2001 at 07:15
RE: concord test flight
Disagree. The advantage goes to the Russians and the Americans, or do you forget the joint Tu-144LL test flights? Tupolev has been designing the Tu-244 SST for some years now and after the test flights with NASA probably has an edge over the Europeans, although not necessarily the USA, which has been conducting SST research since the mid 60’s with the XB-70, YF-12, SR-71, and Tu-144LL, among others.
By: keltic - 21st January 2001 at 17:53
RE: concord test flight
Well, Concorde will be back in service soon. Americans, despite their sayin they were not interested in supersonic flights, are developing a new supersonic aircraft (Boeing) which will be able to fly at small costs with 250 passengers and sonic sound speed. Europeans have the advantage and should learn and develop the new Concorde soon. So more supersonic flights in the future
By: Arabella-Cox - 21st January 2001 at 15:08
RE: concord test flight
LAST EDITED ON 21-Jan-01 AT 03:10 PM (GMT)[p]Just a joke I heard that the French were smitten when this incident occurred being that in one air crash they had killed more Germans in one hit than in WWII }> no offence meant;-)
By: V1 - 18th January 2001 at 18:38
RE: concord test flight
I would place money on Filton too. It has a big wide runway and was where she was built.
By: Paul Cushion - 17th January 2001 at 23:27
RE: concord test flight
I reckon that Filton would be the obvious choice. Any other ideas?
By: V1 - 17th January 2001 at 19:35
RE: concord test flight
P.S. – I think Air France are conducting their tests in Marseille. Not sure where BA will test their a/c yet though…
By: V1 - 17th January 2001 at 19:21
RE: concord test flight
Air France are commencing high speed taxi tests in the south of France on 18th Jan and BA are currently fitting the new Kavlex protection to the fuel tanks, as well as making the wiring around the area of the tanks stronger. It is to cost BA £18 million to do this, but they are confident a once daily Concorde service flying LHR-JFK will commence in the Spring. If this goes OK, they will operate the standard Concorde timetable from September onwards.
By: DK - 17th January 2001 at 13:55
RE: concord test flight
The Concorde possibly will be taken back to airline service in next month
By: Arabella-Cox - 14th January 2001 at 21:44
RE: concord test flight
there is a flight for one of the AF concords from paris to somewhere in southern france to have a new protective cover put around the fuel tanks on thursday 18th jan