December 13, 2013 at 7:55 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LZ_129_Hindenburg
Those were/are huge…compared to Solar Challenger ( 90 kg empty in 1981 ) and Solar Impulse. Think of the most efficient non battery carrying ship based on Solar Challenger ( that carried no batteries unlike Solar Impulse with 1600 kg gross weight ).
By: charliehunt - 7th February 2014 at 12:33
I think this is Topspeed’s personal thread……:)
By: topspeed - 7th February 2014 at 12:10
Here is SOLAR IMPULSE like spanning craft with 2 x solar panel area.
Extra feature are the new accus that provide lotsa power for longer period !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIPsyl3ogc8
Ie 10 x more power and four times the weight compared to SI.
By: topspeed - 2nd February 2014 at 08:35
Small update on this one man one satellite carrier !
On rocket power from 35 km onwards..the thrust is 2 x 5 kN !
By: topspeed - 31st January 2014 at 10:02
In 1865 Jules Verne has been on light propelled ships that fly to space; http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/02/pictures/110208-jules-verne-google-doodle-183rd-birthday-anniversary/
That is 149 years ago !?
Helios is closest to this sofar with 30 000 m altitude.
See this too…537 m2 and 120 kw out put ; http://twistedsifter.com/2012/07/worlds-first-solar-powered-boat-to-circumnavigated-world/
By: topspeed - 31st January 2014 at 08:57
I am afraid so..insane project..sorta.
I wanna explain this a bit…the flying wing does not have the best Cl…and it has also positive Cm..to compensate this they have down side pods ( that cause massive drag ) to give negative Cm..its like ½ as efficient as it could be.
By: topspeed - 30th January 2014 at 07:28
This has gone 1469 meters higher than Caproni Ca 161;
Wingloading is 89 kg/m2.
By: topspeed - 29th January 2014 at 13:23
The modular design of Helios would lend itself to carrying a payload spread evenly over multiple pods; I doubt it could carry a single man (even without a cockpit able to reach 30,000m) without structural failure!
I am afraid so..insane project..sorta.
By: topspeed - 29th January 2014 at 13:22
1600 lbs = 720 kg…minimum fly weight.
862 kg loaded 270 kg max payload.
By: Creaking Door - 29th January 2014 at 13:21
The modular design of Helios would lend itself to carrying a payload spread evenly over multiple pods; I doubt it could carry a single man (even without a cockpit able to reach 30,000m) without structural failure!
By: topspeed - 29th January 2014 at 13:20
I guess so.
By: Creaking Door - 29th January 2014 at 13:16
Payload is 720lb / 329kg.
By: Creaking Door - 29th January 2014 at 13:11
But is that 720 / 1052kg just the minimum weight of the vehicle…..with zero payload?
Not such a good landing either! 🙂
By: topspeed - 29th January 2014 at 13:01
Yes, and what payload?
It has 5 huge pods underneath..looks pretty heavy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Helios
Insanely heavy…720/1052 kilos.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]225030[/ATTACH]
Payload 270-329 kg.
It had 1/10th of the wing area compared to my ship SOLAR EAGLE.
By: Creaking Door - 29th January 2014 at 12:57
28 hp took Helios to 30 km ( 29 432.5 m )…
Yes, and what payload?
By: topspeed - 29th January 2014 at 12:56
It isn’t just about taking off though. It is about taxying, hangar, ground manoeuvring. There is a reason for the 80m commercial limit.
In addition, the wing will have a huge amount of flex in it with that span (unless you make it very thick) . Bend that may not be possible if it’s covered with solar panels.
I figure the wings can be detachable.
By: Derekf - 29th January 2014 at 12:54
It isn’t just about taking off though. It is about taxying, hangar, ground manoeuvring. There is a reason for the 80m commercial limit.
In addition, the wing will have a huge amount of flex in it with that span (unless you make it very thick) . Bend that may not be possible if it’s covered with solar panels.
By: topspeed - 29th January 2014 at 12:51
28 hp took Helios to 30 km ( 29 432.5 m ); http://web.riverdeep.net/current/2001/08/082701_helios.jhtml
By: topspeed - 29th January 2014 at 12:45
Interesting that according to Wiki it used 560kW engine rather more than your design.
128m span!. There isn’t an airfield on the planet that wil be able to accomodate it! Maybe you should think of a seaplane.
I have a 1/5 scale model here…and other to carry payload to orbit…two different things…same problem with LauncherOne..luckily the craft ( Solar Eagle ) takes off after 100 meter dash.
—
Caproni has huge drag…and same wing area as my model…so it is an interesting comparison…my craft wing loading is 1/6th of the Caproni. Power is 1/10th….I’d say the drag 1/10th in my craft..I should calculate it..I found no 3-views of the Caproni.
By: Derekf - 29th January 2014 at 12:40
Interesting that according to Wiki it used 560kW engine rather more than your design.
128m span!. There isn’t an airfield on the planet that wil be able to accomodate it! Maybe you should think of a seaplane.
By: topspeed - 29th January 2014 at 12:33
http://dieselpunks.blogspot.fi/2010/10/invincible-caproni.html
Interesting eh ?