By: DH82EH - 28th November 2015 at 01:00
Any updates on EN224?
The Mk XII is together with a twenties series Spit the most anticipated version to fly (if you ask me).
Cees
I’d have to say the prospect of a Seafire 46 is rather interesting.
Andy
By: kieran9278 - 27th November 2015 at 15:18
Closely followed by EP122 Biggin Hill
The way it’s currently looking, EP122 will be the first to fly!
I believe MT818 was very close to getting back into the air quite a few weeks ago now, but that’s gone quiet again.
By: CeBro - 27th November 2015 at 13:49
Any updates on EN224?
The Mk XII is together with a twenties series Spit the most anticipated version to fly (if you ask me).
Cees
By: SADSACK - 26th September 2015 at 22:33
re:
They will be spoiled for choice of paint scheme. Be nice one day if she reunited with mh434!
By: Mark12 - 26th September 2015 at 07:35
MH415 is on the way to Australia so I understand.
Dismantling and packing is scheduled for October 2015.
Mark
By: ErrolC - 26th September 2015 at 04:57
MH415 is on the way to Australia so I understand.
History round-up at http://www.warbirdsonline.com.au/2015/09/07/spitfire-mh415-to-australia/
By: Mike J - 26th September 2015 at 04:34
MT818…….Booker.
Closely followed by EP122 Biggin Hill
By: Sopwith - 25th September 2015 at 22:47
MT818…….Booker.
MH415 Texas…..not yet.
Mark
MH415 is on the way to Australia so I understand.
By: Bob - 25th September 2015 at 19:58
N3200’s 2016 ‘branding’ is a bit more subtle… 😀
By: Mark12 - 25th September 2015 at 17:52
MT818…….Booker.
MH415 Texas…..not yet.
Mark
By: SADSACK - 25th September 2015 at 17:20
re;
Which Spitfire is likely to fly next?
Has the one with Wilson Connie Edwards moved yet?
By: Mike J - 24th September 2015 at 12:15
Isn’t that the same with all advertising?
By: SADSACK - 24th September 2015 at 12:09
re;
And how many minutes a year does it spend ‘roaring overhead’ compared with the time it spends on the ground, in front of the public?
90% of the public wont care
By: Mike J - 24th September 2015 at 11:47
And how many minutes a year does it spend ‘roaring overhead’ compared with the time it spends on the ground, in front of the public?
By: SADSACK - 24th September 2015 at 11:07
re;
Promoting the IWM sites -in particular Duxford.
It doesnt make much difference when its roaring overhead, its not as if you can see the logo. I’m just glad shes still flying, and not stuck on a riduculous turntable like the airwirthy P51 at Hendon.
By: David Burke - 21st September 2015 at 21:36
Promoting the IWM sites -in particular Duxford.
By: Eye on the Sky - 21st September 2015 at 19:50
Achieve much in terms of what?
By: David Burke - 21st September 2015 at 18:46
Maybe -or maybe people look at the attention to detail expended on the aircraft and wonder does it achieve much !
By: Mike J - 21st September 2015 at 17:43
I’m sure they just did it to annoy the anoraks
By: Russ - 21st September 2015 at 17:03
So you don’t think that IWM are paying the (not insubstantial) operating costs?
Wouldn’t have thought so given budgets etc. Even if they were what would be the advantage of putting your own name on it?
Sign In
September 17, 2015 at 3:15 pm