dark light

DC-3 crash in Antarctica

A Kenn Borek Basler DC-3 crashed on 20/12 fortunately with no injuries among the ten occupants.

http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=e3d35b1c-3f95-4739-858d-fab5f1e9f772&Dynamic=1

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,892

Send private message

By: mike currill - 27th February 2008 at 00:06

That would be good motivation I suppose.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,057

Send private message

By: adrian_gray - 26th February 2008 at 22:56

I just hope the engineers were being well paid for working in those conditions.

Perhaps they were told that the alternative involved walking…:diablo:

Adrian

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

31

Send private message

By: Stampe - 26th February 2008 at 22:03

The true value of aluminium arcraft and skilled engineers able to work in challenging field conditions can,t imagine one of the new composite airframes being flown out!!.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,892

Send private message

By: mike currill - 26th February 2008 at 20:26

Good news indeed!

I am constantly amazed by what can be achieved in the most difficult conditions and surely aircraft repairs (and most other things for that matter) in the Antarctic must fall under that category, even on a good day.

Well done to all involved.

Graeme

I just hope the engineers were being well paid for working in those conditions.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,057

Send private message

By: adrian_gray - 26th February 2008 at 16:29

😮 Wow! 😮 I’ll second those thoughts – I’m guessing from the description that it was effectively a big groundloop at speed, with all the damage you’d expect from the undercart being wiped off.

Getting her back in the air from that, in those conditions, deserves a medal – and just goes to show that it takes a lot to kill a Dak!

I also love the understated caption to the (gory) photo from the first aid exercise…

Adrian

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

566

Send private message

By: CSheppardholedi - 26th February 2008 at 13:59

Truly a great job in the field! Here is a link to an antarctic blog full of photos. A bit of the way down is the repaired A/C, and quite a bit further down is a series of shots of the crash. Quite amazing that it was recoverable.

http://antarctica-coldman.blogspot.com/

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 26th February 2008 at 09:49

Good news indeed!

I am constantly amazed by what can be achieved in the most difficult conditions and surely aircraft repairs (and most other things for that matter) in the Antarctic must fall under that category, even on a good day.

Well done to all involved.

Graeme

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 26th February 2008 at 08:21

Great news!

One month to the day it had its mishap, the Turbo Dak flies out! A team of six engineers toiled under arduous conditions to repair the undercarriage and fit replacement engines. Rescue faciliated by Twin Otter.:)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 24th December 2007 at 08:35

Airplane damage: Substantial
http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20071220-1

Looking at the Google map on that link, it would have been an interesting DC-3 flight from South America, in fact from Canada!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,573

Send private message

By: wieesso - 24th December 2007 at 08:02

Airplane damage: Substantial
http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20071220-1

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 24th December 2007 at 07:53

It SOUNDS like a w/o from this latest report, a New Zealand newspaper!:D

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/4335674a12.html

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,360

Send private message

By: Bager1968 - 23rd December 2007 at 09:39

Well,I wouldn’t count on a NY Times writer knowing what the aircraft was supposed to look like (much less know what was major damage), nor to understand what someone else wrote, so I would wait for further, authorative word before giving up hope of recovery of the aircraft.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 23rd December 2007 at 08:46

6 pax. 4 crew, guess it’s a w/o.:(

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/22/world/22briefs-polar.html?_r=1&ref=world&oref=slogin

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

98

Send private message

By: uksceneryman - 23rd December 2007 at 00:38

BT-67 C-FMKB, to be precise.

Seen in better days:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1122205/L/

Sign in to post a reply