dark light

  • SteveO

DENMARK'S RDN ABSALON-THE WAY FORWARD?

http://www.navalhistory.dk/English/TheShips/A/Absalon_Flex(2004-).htm
http://www.navalteam.dk/supportship.htm

Very impressed with the design of this ship, called a Flexible Command Ship it has a large RO/RO vehicle/cargo deck and flightdeck/hangers for 2 EH-101s all on a 6000 ton destroyer sized hull.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 29th September 2004 at 16:06

You mean these?

Smaller versions of those. There are some pictures and specifications here:

http://www.navalhistory.dk/English/TheShips/Classes/LCP_Class(2004).htm

The RDN have bought 4 of them (2 for each vessel) and they are classified as LCPs. They will be launched with a crane though the smaller aft opening that you can see in one of Wanshan’s pictures.

The larger Swedish ones (also used by Finland and Norway) are classified as LCAs.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 21st September 2004 at 21:53

Is anyone thinking the same as me? Where the hell are the crew and the marines going to sleep? Or are they going for the American way, nl. 35 guys in one room?

The crew will sleep where they always sleep, the marines will be accommodated as needed on the ro/ro ‘flex deck’ (if that deck isn’t parked full with vehicles and equipment, that is)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 21st September 2004 at 21:47

Wanshan: Mate thanks for the indepth sketches, but did you have to take up so much bandwidth? Try reducing the size next time mate, think of us poor Dial up users 🙁

Sorry ’bout that, still getting used to this environment. Editted the post to accommodate.

http://www.navalhistory.dk/images/Skibene/FlexStoetteskibe/FlexSoesaettes25022004_2a.jpg

http://www.navalhistory.dk/images/Skibene/FlexStoetteskibe/Layout_stor.gif

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,659

Send private message

By: Ja Worsley - 21st September 2004 at 18:14

Wanshan: Mate thanks for the indepth sketches, but did you have to take up so much bandwidth? Try reducing the size next time mate, think of us poor Dial up users 🙁

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,444

Send private message

By: SteveO - 21st September 2004 at 17:38

Severodvinsk

Yes thats them, have you seen the version with the twin mortar turret?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 20th September 2004 at 20:25

http://www.sok.dk/enheder/2004_06_04/01_1.jpg

Attached an article from Jane’s IDR August 04:
Flex fleet: Denmark’s new standard warships emerge

HDMS Absalon, the first of a new generation of surface warships for the Royal Danish Navy, was scheduled to be delivered at the end of July, and construction of the second of five new standard ships is well under way. J. J. Lok examines the build program

Interesting read!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

514

Send private message

By: Severodvinsk - 20th September 2004 at 19:00

You mean these?
http://home.swipnet.se/~w-52089/marine/strib90h.jpg
http://home.swipnet.se/~w-52089/marine/dubbel.jpg
http://home.swipnet.se/~w-52089/marine/assault.gif

So, if I get it right, this thing is everything except a concept… It’s a very real almost completed ship.
Are they building two of them? or is that another ship in front of the last picture?
Is anyone thinking the same as me? Where the hell are the crew and the marines going to sleep? Or are they going for the American way, nl. 35 guys in one room?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,444

Send private message

By: SteveO - 20th September 2004 at 17:28

Thanks Wanshan, interesting pics!

Looks like it carries Swedish style assault boats.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 19th September 2004 at 23:35

http://www.sok.dk/enheder/L17_1.jpg

http://www.sok.dk/enheder/L17_2.jpg

http://www.sok.dk/enheder/L17_3.jpg

See also http://www.smk.svn.dk/projekter/beskrivelser/fs-ps.htm

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,319

Send private message

By: Jonesy - 16th September 2004 at 23:48

It looks like the artwork has a certain ‘advisory’ quality to it and the FCS installation pictured is vague to say the least!

It looks like there is at least one FlexFire director detailed aft on a pedestal mount. Presumably there would have to be another mounted forward to service the 5-incher if nothing else. A further, resonable, supposition would be that the FlexFire would have to be upgraded to give it a bit more range to allow for exploitation of the range enhancement of ESSM over NSSMS.

One thing that is certain though is that there is no shortage of X-band directors available, from several companies, off-the-shelf that could mate to a C-FLEX type combat system. Perhaps the vagueness is attributable to the fact that the FCS is yet to be determined at this, early, stage in the design.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

581

Send private message

By: JonS - 16th September 2004 at 16:08

If you look amidships, just forward of the SSM quads, there looks like 3 of the 6-pot Mk48 Mod 3 VLS modules that the smaller STANFLEX vessels are fitted for. With the new DP-48 dualpack cannisters being developed for the Danish Navy each one of these Mod3 modules can carry 12 ESSM

thought so but i couldnt clearly spot any FCR for it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,444

Send private message

By: SteveO - 14th September 2004 at 21:03

Hope it does all work out though. Seeing the use HMS Richmond is being put to providing emergency assistance operations in wake of hurricane Ivan in the Carribean a dozen or so of these vessels, obviously equipped to RN commonality standard, could fulfill the low-end side of the anticipated RN FSC project hi-low mix quite handily!.

My thoughts exactly!

As you say, carrying MBTs is overdoing it a bit, but the ability to carry and land a few trucks, engineer vehicles and a field hospital would greatly enhance peace time operations. In combat operations the extra room could be used for stores and reloads.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,319

Send private message

By: Jonesy - 14th September 2004 at 20:33

Jon,

If you look amidships, just forward of the SSM quads, there looks like 3 of the 6-pot Mk48 Mod 3 VLS modules that the smaller STANFLEX vessels are fitted for. With the new DP-48 dualpack cannisters being developed for the Danish Navy each one of these Mod3 modules can carry 12 ESSM.

What you have detailed on deck there, therefore, is probably 36 ESSM. Not too shabby for a GP design.

I had heard that there was another, larger, STANFLEX design in the works but this is the first I’ve seen of it. It has to be said that the specs are very impressive, but, I would be concerned about the compromises necessary to achieve all thats advertised on a 6k ton hull (a vehicle deck???) . To put in it perspective an LCF displaces 6000ton and I’m fairly sure there’s little room that can be found in that hull for MBT’s that wouldn’t necessitate a reduction, for example, in fuel bunkerage or other such consumable stores.

Hope it does all work out though. Seeing the use HMS Richmond is being put to providing emergency assistance operations in wake of hurricane Ivan in the Carribean a dozen or so of these vessels, obviously equipped to RN commonality standard, could fulfill the low-end side of the anticipated RN FSC project hi-low mix quite handily!.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,444

Send private message

By: SteveO - 14th September 2004 at 20:32

JonS

Proposal to fit Sea Sparrow and Stingers, I’d guess they mean ESSM and RAM.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

581

Send private message

By: JonS - 14th September 2004 at 17:04

anyword on what SAM system isto be fitted on these?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,444

Send private message

By: SteveO - 13th September 2004 at 18:25

Indian1973

True, but it would be very useful for special ops raids, evacuations and disaster relief roles.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,845

Send private message

By: Indian1973 - 13th September 2004 at 18:05

well what use would this ships land complement other than in a peacekeeping op or fighting a batallion of tribals somewhere ?
too few, too small to matter.

serious expeditionary land ops need serious ships like the Tarawa class.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,444

Send private message

By: SteveO - 13th September 2004 at 17:35

I’d like to see these operating the USMC Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle.
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=30421

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,659

Send private message

By: Ja Worsley - 13th September 2004 at 02:06

Wow these look very impressive and they are getting two of them, cool.

Sign in to post a reply