August 12, 2004 at 3:37 am
Has anyone sen this movie? I watched it recently and it seemsl ike it was made around the time of 633 squadron? It was quite funny actually, seeing spitfires done up as the “enemy” and 109s painted up as spitfires!!
By: DazDaMan - 28th October 2005 at 21:36
Ahh, all this talk of 633 makes me want to watch it again! 😀
By: sniperUK - 28th October 2005 at 21:33
Think thats it.
By: DazDaMan - 28th October 2005 at 21:17
I think the best bit in 663 is when the Mossie(special effects by Airfix) hits the mountain and bounces back then explodes.
Is that the bit where Mike Baldwin gets killed?
By: sniperUK - 28th October 2005 at 19:54
I think the best bit in 663 is when the Mossie(special effects by Airfix) hits the mountain and bounces back then explodes.
Oops mean 633 I must be hanging around the VGS too much 😀
By: DazDaMan - 28th October 2005 at 17:28
I don’t think they were RC models – I think they were on strings.
(Remember a sequence in 633 Squadron showing a Mosquito (I think) exploding – you could see the wire attached to the thing as it was a control-line model!)
By: PDS - 28th October 2005 at 17:19
The Spitfires painted as Messerschmitts surely had to be radio controlled models.
Mark
I agree. if you look at this image. It seems to have the PRXI deep lower engine cowling…
By: sniperUK - 28th October 2005 at 16:53
Cant remember but they may have been on strings all I remember is the film was rubbish.
By: Mark12 - 28th October 2005 at 09:21
The main problem was tht they were using REAL Buchons as Spitfires and Spitfires as Messershmits :confused:
The Spitfires painted as Messerschmitts surely had to be radio controlled models.
Mark
By: ollieholmes - 28th October 2005 at 09:17
I do agree that makes no sense whatsoever. Anyone remember the director?
By: sniperUK - 28th October 2005 at 09:06
The main problem was tht they were using REAL Buchons as Spitfires and Spitfires as Messershmits :confused:
By: ollieholmes - 27th October 2005 at 23:53
You have to remember that this was a long time ago and they did not have computers and as good a cgi’s. Sometimes though i feel the modern cgis etc make a film look worse than better. But i do agree that, from those shots, that it was pretty bad.
By: sniperUK - 27th October 2005 at 23:45
I remember seeing this as a kid though it was called Battle Squadron it was in a double bill with one called Seven for Hell a Dirty Dozen rip off,I remember being so angry and confused about the mixed up aircraft.I remember it so well because I walked out of the cinema and into a riot!
By: T J Johansen - 27th October 2005 at 16:34
Sorry to drag up this old thread, but if anyone is interested in this movie you can find it through eBay. I just ordered the combo with Spitfire starring Leslie Howard! Available in both PAL and VHS so it can be enjoyed on both sides of the atlantic…! :rolleyes:
T J
By: DazDaMan - 17th August 2004 at 08:27
Dazdaman…
Yeah they were crap all right LOL
No really that is the exact same footage.. Funny eh?!
😉
You notice these things a lot when you really get to know aviation movies – a lot of stock footage will turn up, even in the classics (see Reach for the Sky and Angels One-Five for an example).
For its faults, though, A Yank in the RAF does have some nice stock Spitty footage! :rolleyes:
By: Bradburger - 16th August 2004 at 21:57
I remember seeing this once a LONG time ago also…thought to myself “What MORON would actually be dumb enough to screw up the planes and markings THIS BADLY in a movie?” Funny thing is…looking now, with that deep chin on the Hispanos, it allows the paint to run under the nose and in the screen shot above, SOMEWHAT look like a Spit! Still…does this one merit a ‘worst of all time’ aviation movie kudo?
Mark
Probably does Corsair but what about the “1000 Plane Raid”?
It was on on of the satellite channels a few weeks ago and I was reminded again how awful it was! 😮
However, there was some prety good low flying by a B17 in it. At one point I’m sure the tailwheel touched the ground on one of the passes!
Maybe we should have a poll on the worst aviation movies to find out which one we think is a stinker!
Cheers
Paul
By: Peter - 16th August 2004 at 21:48
Dazdaman…
Yeah they were crap all right LOL
No really that is the exact same footage.. Funny eh?!
By: T J Johansen - 16th August 2004 at 17:37
After checking around on net, I find that Eagles over London was made in 1969 or 1970, depending on the web side one accesses! So, here is the question; which Hispano’s are they, and who flew them? Are there any credits on the end of the film to suggest anything? Which film company made this film? Maybe they can come up with some info if they are contacted! Also, the T-6s are interesting. Can they have been Spanish AF examples used for this movie? The Spanish were heavily involved with Battle of Britain, so quite possibly they were doing this as well. I see the T-6 have the football antenna, and the G model canopy, and the Spanish had G models with these antennas. As for the Spitfire with German marks, do you ever see this plane on the ground with people around it? Since it has been 20 years since I saw it, I don’t remember much at all!
T J Johansen
Oslo, NORWAY
By: Mark12 - 16th August 2004 at 16:24
This a model.
Apart from the exhaust, as mentioned, look at the area around the wing roots and that panel line for the lower cowling.
But what about the German Spitfire – same model?
Mark
By: Mark12 - 16th August 2004 at 16:12
This a model.
Apart from the exhaust, as mentioned, look at the area around the wing roots and that panel line for the lower cowling.
But what about the German Spitfire – same model?
Mark
By: Dave Homewood - 16th August 2004 at 10:04
Those Spitfire exhausts look pretty long, longer than usual, or is that just an optical illusion due to the angle from below?