February 23, 2010 at 8:07 am
This early Prop came out of the water approximately 4.5 miles north of Lundy yesterday does anyone have a clue what it might belong to?
By: Arabella-Cox - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
Blenheim?
By: Graham Adlam - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
Looks to have counter weights
By: Arabella-Cox - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
Hampden?
By: CanberraA84-232 - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
its from a radial of some description, ill go for either B-17, they look like Wright internals to me
By: pagen01 - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
Wouldn’t those counter weights suggest a Mecury three bladed prop powered type, such as a Blenheim or Gladiator.
By: philip turland - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
prop
Blenheim?
i am with you Blenheim
By: John Aeroclub - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
The pitch and bob weights direction on the prop suggests british DH build Hamilton Standard rotation (Bristol), so until we know the diameter it could be either Mercury or Pegasus or early Hercules.
John
By: pagen01 - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
It looks like a single row radial from the pics, but also did Pegasus and Hercules have bob weighted props (are they hidden within the spinner)?
By: John Aeroclub - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
Yes, most three blade metal airscrews on british early war aeroplanes were DH built Hamiltons (including Spitfires and Hurricanes but with American (Rolls-Royce)rotation). The later ROTOL (ROlls-BrisTOL) props found favour with british engine companies over the DH produced Hamilton Hydromatics.
John
By: Creaking Door - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
Throwing a wide ball here but…Battle?
No, the Farman type reduction gears and radial engine master / slave rods absolutely rule-out a Merlin engine.
As has been suggested, it is a Bristol Pegasus or Mercury engine.
Not Hercules…..as it has a cam to operate poppet valves. 😉
By: Tin Triangle - 31st March 2025 at 10:37
Throwing a wide ball here but… Battle?
Sure the prop on a Battle had counderweights like that…
By: Creaking Door - 31st March 2025 at 10:36
…does anyone have a clue what it might belong to?
It is useful that the slave connecting-rods are still attached as I believe they were different lengths for the Bristol Pegasus and Mercury engine. Is it possible for somebody to measure them?
Also if it were possible for somebody to count the teeth on all the reduction gears it will be possible to say what the reduction ratio is and that may rule-out certain types (although both Pegasus and Mercury had an identical range of ratios).
Since the front and rear gears are of different sizes the 0.5:1 ratio can be ruled-out.
By: Graham Adlam - 31st March 2025 at 10:36
I will try and get that info asap thanks for the info so far at least Spitfire is ruled out.
By: CanberraA84-232 - 31st March 2025 at 10:35
having had a good long hard study of this picture, im going to go with Swordfish
By: pagen01 - 31st March 2025 at 10:35
Prop boss looks wrong for Swordfish, not sure about those weights on one either.
By: Peter - 31st March 2025 at 10:35
Looks like a blenheim prop to me…
By: Hampden Project - 31st March 2025 at 10:35
The reduction gear is Bristol Pegasus, fitted with a De Havilland constant speed controllable pitch airscrew which was fitted to the Hampden, Wellington, Sunderland ect but not the Swordfish as this had a fixed pitch metal prop.
By: captainslow - 31st March 2025 at 10:35
Here is a picture of the Blenheim prop in the Manston museum, looks pretty similar, and to the prop on the recovered engine from T9044, the Pembroke Dock Sunderland.
By: CanberraA84-232 - 31st March 2025 at 10:35
The reduction gear is Bristol Pegasus, fitted with a De Havilland constant speed controllable pitch airscrew which was fitted to the Hampden, Wellington, Sunderland ect but not the Swordfish as this had a fixed pitch metal prop.
i stand corrected
By: Creaking Door - 31st March 2025 at 10:35
The reduction gear is Bristol Pegasus…
…not Mercury? Not doubting you…..just interested to know how you can say from that photograph.