October 15, 2010 at 10:53 pm
A friend sent me this.
I enjoyed reading the review and I’m tempted to try the book – anybody read it?
Roger Smith
Empire of the Clouds: When Britain’s Aircraft Ruled the World, By James Hamilton-Paterson
Review by Michael Bywater
Friday, 15 October 2010
Bear joke. You know the Bear Joke. Abbreviated version: hunter, gun, slaughter. Vast bear survives. Bear inflicts sexual indignities on hunter. Hunter limps painfully home, comes back next day with increased firepower, more carnage. Bear escalates bestial revenge. Third day. Hunter crawls back, bruised and bleeding, with tank, flame-thrower, reduces forest to charred smoking stumps, bleak silence littered with charred fauna. Bear appears. Looks at hunter. Hunter looks at bear. Bear says: “Be honest. This isn’t about hunting, is it?”
Empire of the Clouds isn’t about aviation. Or it’s about aviation in the same way a red rash is about meningitis. James Hamilton-Paterson is interested in test pilots, the fearless, yet reassuringly mortal heroes of his youth. He is interested in fighters more than in bombers; in bombers more than in civil transport aircraft. But the real question, all along, is: what the hell happened?
It’s a question which bubbles to the surface when anyone contemplates Britain in the last hundred years. And it’s as relevant now as it’s ever been. We’ve got no manufacturing industry to talk of. We’re fished out, mined out and sold out. Our bankers are a busted flush. Our service industries have nobody to serve. Our politicians are entwined in a pointless rhetorical homogeneity. All we have left to take to the world’s table is our astonishing intellectual fertility. In the world of ideas, Britain has, since the Enlightenment, punched wildly above its weight; yet in the last century it has almost ritualistically done itself down. And now that ideas and intellectual property are almost all we have left – look at the recent crop of Nobel science laureates from British universities – our politicians are planning to cut back education. Good thinking, chaps.
Hamilton-Paterson’s particular genius in this case is to pick the right example – the aircraft industry – to make the general case.
From the first description of an Avro Vulcan ambling a hundred feet over the Peak District then thunderously blasting up vertically on its pillars of reheat fire, to Alan Pollock’s celebrated full-power, low-level and unannounced triple pass over Parliament in his Hunter, thrice interrupting a Commons debate before passing through the centre of Tower Bridge to mark the cheeseparing closure of Tangmere aerodrome, his material, his enthusiasm and his research keep what would otherwise be an adagio of decline racing along like a Vampire F1 on a hairy initial-and-pitch.
Yet all along, we are thinking: this is the story of Britain. Time and again, we have it; and time and again, we throw it away. It’s not just the jet engine which powered the transport which in turn shaped the modern world; it’s not just the radar or the ill-fated Comet, the car industry, coal-mining, the railways, education; it’s everything. More and more, you come to realise that the old saw is true. Come to a Briton with an idea and he’ll give you ten reasons why it won’t work; take the same idea to an American and he’ll give you ten reasons why it will.
But Empire of the Clouds is not mere cultural history by stealth. You could perfectly well read it for the two star roles, the test pilots and the aeroplanes themselves. As a New Elizabethan, 11 years old at the Coronation in 1953, Hamilton-Paterson fell under the spell of Eagle and Boy’s Own, the RAF recruiting advertisements (“Your future is in the air and can start when you’re fifteen”) and not just Dan Dare, Pilot of the Future, but John Derry, Neville Duke, Roland Twiss, Ronald Falk, Bill Cunningham… test pilots all, and household names. The last one in the line was probably Brian Trubshaw, the Concorde senior test pilot; now, though the Empire Test Pilot School at Boscombe Down is still, along with Pax River in the US, the most celebrated flight test academy in the world, the test pilots themselves are not stars, but quiet, logical types who go home to their wives each day and fully expect to draw their pensions, not (as once) if they still exist, but if their pensions do.
There was, in the aftermath of the Second World War, what Hamilton-Paterson calls “prodigious talent, skill and inventive energy” in the British aero industry. “Maybe,” he adds, “we could start by wondering whatever had become of all those national high spirits, the dash and verve and daring.”
In air-to-air photographs of prototype aircraft, he continues, “inside the cockpits, their grinning faces turned towards the camera only yards away, are men often in their shirtsleeves, or wearing a jacket and tie… nothing better illustrates the gulf between the world they inhabited then and our own today than the way they dressed to fly. It is not just the informality that strikes us but the lack of kit… we look back at men carrying out a morning’s worth of potentially lethal spinning trials wearing the jackets from their demob suits and with nothing on their heads but a dab of Brylcreem.”
It was a very British style which took a long time to die away; longer, indeed, than the British aero industry. I remember a few years ago going to Toulouse to do a segment for the BBC’s The Air Show about Airbus Industrie. We were going to fly back in a new Airbus, fully rigged out with test equipment, and during the course of the flight I’d get my hands on the controls. Out on the apron bright and early, we filmed the technicians and engineers arriving and the co-pilot doing the walk-around.
But where was the man himself? The test pilot?In due course, a slight, affable northener appeared, wearing what looked like M&S cavalry twills, a pair of ordinary brown shoes, and a houndstooth tweed jacket. He looked for all the world like an assistant bank manager on his day off, or a physics master from a top-rank grammar school. “Hop on, then,” he said. It was the test pilot. Dressed for a day in front of the second-year sixth. A proper, English test pilot. I was beside myself with pride and pleasure.
But if the ghostly influence of the post-war test pilots remains, the aeroplanes they tested are long gone. A typically British mess of complacent businessmen (one test pilot had to abort his careful schedule when the company man in the right-hand seat demanded they return for the four-course management lunch), political fannying-about, loss of nerve, obstructive and gutless civil servants with jobs for life, and a general incompetence unimagineable anywhere else: aeroplanes being built in one place, dismantled, tracked by road to the nearest manageable (grass, sodden) runway, reassembled, then taking off in a thick furrow of splashing mud. Aeroplanes being specified by the Ministry, then the specifications being changed, then the project withdrawn, the jigs and tools destroyed, the drawings incinerated. The remarkable Fairey FD2 had to be tested at Dassault’s base in Cazaux, south of Bordeaux, because of British rules prohibiting supersonic flight. UK insurers quoted impossible premiums until Marcel Dassault found a French company that would insure the whole programme for £40. Meanwhile, Dassault was taking notes, and his own internationally-successful Mirage III eventually bore a remarkable resemblance to the Fairey FD.
In the end, it was the preposterous Duncan Sandys who decapitated the British aero industry; oddly symmetrical since it was Sandys himself who was said to have been decapitated in the famous “headless man” photographs with the Duchess of Argyll. It all came to nothing.
You’ll look in vain for Gloster or De Havilland, English Electric, Avro, Supermarine or Vickers. The Valiant, the Hunter, the “lovely little Fairey Delta” and the DH110 which killed De Havilland’s second son: they are mere memories. Britain’s advantage in transatlantic jet travel was lost with the Comet. (I sat alone in the cockpit of the last airworthy Comet at Boscombe Down. It was fully fuelled, and I was very tempted.)
In short, as in long, we blew it. Empire of the Clouds is a splendid, meticulous and stylish story of wonderful machines and the men who made them. It is also a tale of fudging, incompetence, malice, complacency and ignorance. It is a story of defeat snatched from the jaws of victory. It is a very British tale indeed.
By: Sky High - 2nd February 2011 at 14:29
Finished it at the weekend – excellent read, well laid out, continuously intetresting and consistently well written. I felt I was reliving my life as an aviation nut, as we are of a similar age. Highly recommended.
By: --o-o-O-o-o-- - 4th January 2011 at 19:27
Started it last night and read far more than I intended…undoubtedly I’ll be knackered at work again tomorrow!
By: Sky High - 4th January 2011 at 11:18
Also finished it. Very enjoyable, very readable and highly recommended to any one, particularly those who remember Dan Dare, Harris Tweed, PC 49 and the drawings of L Ashwell Wood. You know who you are!
😀 We sure do………………….
By: T-21 - 4th January 2011 at 11:12
I saw a lone copy in Sainsburys but it was much cheaper to buy on Amazon.
By: slicer - 4th January 2011 at 10:20
Also finished it. Very enjoyable, very readable and highly recommended to any one, particularly those who remember Dan Dare, Harris Tweed, PC 49 and the drawings of L Ashwell Wood. You know who you are!
By: TempestV - 4th January 2011 at 08:52
Empire of the Clouds
I’ve just read this book over Christmas. This is really good – Very well written, and one I couldn’t put down.
….My only gripe is that in such a well reserched book, a line-up of Vampire F.3’s is incorrectly captioned as being F.1’s.
By: RPSmith - 28th November 2010 at 21:52
Which supermarket please??
Roger Smith.
By: inkworm - 28th November 2010 at 19:10
About halfway through it at the moment and it is a great read, seems to have a good balance and links from event to anecdote nicely, was on offer in the supermarket for a fiver brand new so couldn’t pass it up.
The writing style also makes it easy to read, even when he does cover facts and statistics they aren’t presented in a boring manner.
By: J Boyle - 28th November 2010 at 19:05
I was reminded while reading the airliners section of the recent de Havilland-themed issue of FlyPast about the number of British types that had good careers overseas.
The Dove and Heron, and the 125, all DH products that had very successful careers…especially in the US (the last time I saw an active Dove was 1980 at Boise. I was with an historically-minded airline/ex-Army Vietnam helicopter pilot friend who pointed out the similarities between it and the Mossie).
In fact, even after the 125 was bought by Raytheon (Beech) it was still made in the UK.
And lets not forget the Viscount and BAC 1-11, again healthy sellers with significant US markets.
It wasn’t the Comet that doomed the UK aviation industry…it was politics.
In a nationalized scheme, you had politicians deciding what needed to be built, not the guys that built and sold them…and who knew what would sell overseas.
It worked about as well as a Soviet-era Five Year Plan for food production.
From my view (which as a foreigner may not be complete) it looks as if the politicians found it easier to get votes with social programs than trying to explain how spending money on aircraft would strengthen the country and its workers, in the long run.
They either thought the people were too stupid to understand that, or too lazy to explain it to them.
Seems like a good case for capitalism. 😀
If General Dynamics wasnts to lose many millions of dollars on the CV-880 and 990, they were free to do so.
Who knows, it may have worked under different circumstances.
As Gunston points out, the V1000 could have eclisped the 707/DC-8 not only for BOAC’s 707 fleet, but in many other countries that had a traditional preference for UK products.
And even the Fairey Rotodyne had solid US and Japanese orders when it was decided to pull the plug.
There were a lot of small firms that needed to be combined post war.
A look ot my shelf of Putnams volumes on UK firms indicates there was a good deal of over capacity in the UK industry…as well as a lot of talent.
But don’t feel too bad. The US industry has gone through its own rationalization…think of the great marques that are no longer around or merged byond recognition:
Republic, North American, Douglas, Grumman (at least in aircraft production).
By: mike bb - 28th November 2010 at 17:16
I’ve had the book in my hands in bookshops and read some extracts which certainly change my view from the unqualified admiration I had for the UK industry’s products in the 50s and 60s when I was a mere lad! But the test pilots who were my heroes still come out of it well…
I’m hoping someone will buy it for me for Christmas…
By: Elliott Marsh - 28th November 2010 at 11:43
Mark Broadbent has also recently reviewed ‘Empire of the Clouds’ for Global Aviation Resource for those who need more persuading.
By: low'n'slow - 28th November 2010 at 10:06
Positive review by Johnny de Uphaugh in the latest A******** Monthly. Looks like a good bet for the Christmas present list!
By: JDK - 28th November 2010 at 08:28
Bump –
Thanks to a head’s up by Nicholas Waller on my friend Bretts Airminded blog, I was pointed at a brief interview with J H-P and an Air Chief Marshal, Sir Michael Knight (ret) on the book on the Today programme:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9095000/9095132.stm
By: longshot - 17th October 2010 at 15:37
…..Viscount, Canberra and Hunter. So, UK could hold its head up….
I’d say that with Canberra, Viscount, Valiant from about 1952 to 1958 the UK could hold its head up (note it’s mostly Vickers under George Edwards)…if the Comet I had held together and the Britannia programme had been run like the Viscount’s and the V1000 hadn’t been cancelled there would have been a lot more exports. Later on the BAC-111 and HS146 did fairly well
By: WebPilot - 17th October 2010 at 14:19
a significant section of the workforce being uncommitted to the success of their company
Hamilton-Paterson skewers both management and work force for that particular failing. 🙂
By: WebPilot - 17th October 2010 at 11:49
I’ve just finished it and would recommend it; well researched, insightful, evocative and a real page turner. It’s very well written (unlike many aviation titles!).
By: JDK - 17th October 2010 at 10:01
It’ll be interesting to read something by JH-P that I’m probably more familiar with than he is – at least in patches.
Precisely when DID Britain’s aircraft rule the world?
I’d agree with Alertken, but also the British aero industry was very nicely able to sell in a closed marked under the Empire Protection Scheme concepts in the 1920s and 30s across all the pink bits on the maps. No Fokkers for Smithy’s airlines, Avro 10s, thanks, and no Lockheed 10s, you were supposed to buy and like Dragon Rapides instead. The fuss made when CAC selected the NA 16 – an American aeroplane – shock – by clowns like CG Grey was astonishing, and only moderated when Britain ordered Harvards, due to Miles’ numbers shortfalls…
Regards,
By: alertken - 17th October 2010 at 09:42
ls: exactly. We were at competitive par, on and off, during WW1; in WW2 Spit/Lanc/Mossie were par+, so let’s forget all the dogs in Gunston’s Worst Planes book. Jet+radar diffused concurrently in UK and elsewhere, as much techno-innovation does, and UK then did par Viscount, Canberra and Hunter. So, UK could hold its head up….as could Sweden, France. Domestic scale put us in rank 2, behind US for product range and USSR for production quantity.
Ministers chose to create an Aero-munitions industry. In Peace others caught up. Now UK makes lumps of good things, like Airbuses, in coalition with partners, to obtain production scale. 50% of a lot is better than 100% of a cancellation. Where’s the beef? Where’s the decline? Xenophobic tosh.
By: longshot - 16th October 2010 at 21:12
Precisely when DID Britain’s aircraft rule the world?
By: Stepwilk - 16th October 2010 at 19:23
I just ordered the Kindle edition, here in the U. S.