April 12, 2002 at 12:51 pm
As I see it their are 3 types of big fan in use today, with each maker supplying 2 models:
Rolls Royce
RB-211 and Trent
GE
CF-6 and GE90
PW
JT9-D and PW4000
What are your personal favourites?
By: dakota2 - 11th December 2005 at 09:35
Just think – if you hand started your engine you would “flick” it anti clockwise consequently your starter is turning it correctly.
I am not quite sure of your comment re the cone!
This is usually referred to as a “Spinner” the important thing is to make sure that the crankshaft nut is fully tightened.
If I can be of further help please advise.
dakota2
By: trainnee!! - 3rd December 2005 at 17:43
Engine
Hi the engine i have is a SC 40, the reason for the question is that my starter is spining it anti clockwise and the prop is hiting the cone and i think i have fitted the prop the wrong side of the plastic stoppers, please let me know your thoughts.
regards
By: steve_p - 3rd December 2005 at 16:25
It depends on the engine. Which one do you want info on?
Best wishes
Steve P
By: steauw - 4th May 2003 at 22:52
Customers are given a choice of engines compatable with the variant of aircraft they have ordered. Their choice is determined on so many factors:
Fleet cominality
Engine overhaul contract
Efficency
Noise
Availability and cost of parts
Number of aircraft cycles
Reliabilty
What is required of the aircraft using them
Long or short haul
Environment they will be run in
Overall cost of buying the engine itself
These are just a few of the questions that the board need to answer before they make their choice.
Hope it has helped.
By: KabirT - 29th April 2003 at 05:41
An Airline will see reliability, economic factors, maintanence, after sales, spares etc. In the end all an airline chooses the same engine time for a particulor fleet as if it chooses different engines the cost will sky rocket.
By: greekdude1 - 29th April 2003 at 03:58
I think engine commonality plays a role sometimes. Then again, Singapore chose the Trent for their 777’s, where their entire fleet was P&W powered. I think politics plays a major role, as well. Look at the big stink that happened when BA initially chose GE to powere their 777’s. Didn’t subsequent orders have Trents as the engine choice? I know their 777 fleet has both engine types.
By: SOC - 29th April 2003 at 00:40
Sometimes the right engine makes all the difference between success and failure. Look at the Tu-144. The original NK-144 turbofans were rather inefficient. Only by producing the Tu-144D with RD-36-51 turbojets was Tupolev able to get the full potential out of the design. Pity it came to such a short end.
By: EGNM - 29th April 2003 at 00:13
Sorry matthew – noise is of the essence! – ah those FR B732s…
By: dan330 - 28th April 2003 at 23:26
Don’t know really but I assume that some are more efficient, while others are more reliable and some probably cost more than others, get better repair deals etc.
Obviously commonality is a factor, Cathay pretty much use all RR.
Don’t know why the differences with each aircraft, as you say RB211 for 757 and others (that compete with RB211) for other aircraft. I remember reading somewhere that an RR engine (maybe RB 211 could have been trent) was more reliable but less efficient than the competition. As the 744 has 4 engines maybe this is a bigger saving than a 757, which explains why they are more popluar than the RB211 on the 744 and not so on the 757.
By: monster500 - 13th April 2002 at 02:14
RE: Engines
I am a big fan of the old GE CF 6 50E2
seen on old Lufthansa 747s absolute pearler of an engine and one of the less noisier also and look stunning
By: mongu - 12th April 2002 at 23:45
RE: Engines
Yeah, Middlesbrough is poor – but I moved out when I was 13 so I haven’t got a complex about it.
By: Rabie - 12th April 2002 at 20:59
RE: Engines
ahh northern monkies !!!!
nah 🙂 , i have a mate form middelsbrough and we tease him about that recent survay that middelsbrough is the poorest palce in the country and he’s come down here to join all the kosovans and afgans (were in kent).
rabie :9
By: GZYL - 12th April 2002 at 19:09
RE: Engines
Hey, lay off Northerners!!!
By: mongu - 12th April 2002 at 18:19
RE: Engines
Well speaking as a Northerner – fu*k off!
Only joking – I’m still bitter over they way the Evening Standard treated “the north” when Middlesbrough (ie. my team) bought Juninho from under Arsenals’s nose in 1995!
By: Rabie - 12th April 2002 at 18:08
RE: Engines
well its a river up tut north (to a southern any thing north of the watford gap is north and alien :D)
rabie :9
By: mongu - 12th April 2002 at 18:05
RE: Engines
Well, “Trent” is certainly the most imaginative of all the names!
By: mongu - 12th April 2002 at 18:03
RE: Engines
I didn’t forget the CFM 56, just that I never really considered them “big” – more of a 737 or A320 engine (though admittedly they do propel A340’s)
By: GZYL - 12th April 2002 at 17:27
RE: Engines
Is the RR Trent still the worlds only 3-shaft turbofan engine? That’d be my favourite… Why? It’s British 🙂 !!!
By: Bhoy - 12th April 2002 at 16:38
RE: Engines
you’d never have guessed…
but my favourite engine is the RB211-535C
By: Glenn - 12th April 2002 at 13:49
RE: Engines
The GE 90 for me, it recently broke the world record for static thrust for a high-bypass turbofan. That thing rocks!
Regards, Glenn.