I may have missed this:
… if so, I’ll kill the thread.
By: fighterace - 17th December 2011 at 15:25
Interesting times ahead……. At the rate we are going you will need an archaeologist to weed the garden.
Archaeology is the study of human society, primarily through the recovery and analysis of the material culture and environmental data that they have left behind, which includes artifacts. Does this relate to crashed aircraft “NO”. Whilst yes they are historically linked to an event in time there is very little to learn apart from rare aircraft such as the Do17 as most crash sites are well documentated. Lets be honist we are talking small parts most of the time anyway.
Not being funny, they are a little late if they are hoping to either stop or make it that difficult to obtain permission for an excavation as most of the sites were excavated in the 70’s & 80’s and yes there are detailed reorts of what was recovered all be it not in the public viewing.
By: Alan Clark - 15th December 2011 at 19:32
No, I don’t think you have missed anything, this is the first I have heard of a new consultation. I guess this will come round every 10 years when the document is reviewed.
It would certainly go well with Andy Saunders’ recent thread about licensing, http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=113615
Sign In
December 15, 2011 at 7:08 pm