August 31, 2002 at 6:38 am
FAA issues emergency order to inspect 1,440 Boeing jets:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Aviation Administration issued an emergency order Friday compelling U.S. airlines to inspect 1,440 Boeing jets to see if they have a fuel pump with potentially faulty wiring that could lead to an explosion.
The FAA stressed that no serious incidents have been linked to problems with the pumps, which are made by Hydro-Aire Inc. of Burbank, Calif., and were installed in January and April on Boeing 737s, 747s and 757s.
The airlines were given four days to inspect their fleets. The FAA estimated 1,250 pumps could have a problem with wires that were placed too close to a rotor and can chafe.
Ron Wojnar, the FAA’s deputy director of aircraft certification services, said any airlines with the pumps are being ordered to keep enough fuel in the tanks to cover the devices even when the planes bank or encounter turbulence in flight.
Wojnar said the submersion would prevent any sparks from igniting fuel vapors.
“This is not an unsafe condition,” he said.
The order affects 515 of the 737s, 247 of the 747s, and 678 of the 757s operated by U.S. carriers.
Foreign airlines operate about 2,100 of the Boeing jets. The FAA is sending advisories about the pumps to its counterpart agencies in those countries.
The FAA will issue a follow-up directive in a few weeks, instructing carriers to repair or replace any faulty pumps, Wojnar said.
The pumps are located in the center fuel tank under the fuselage. Some planes may also have pumps in wing tanks.
Boeing spokeswoman Liz Veridier said her company sent the airlines a bulletin Wednesday ordering the pumps to be replaced on 116 new planes that had been put into use this year.
Greg Ward, president of Hydro-Aire, said the problem appears to have occurred while the pumps were being assembled. Hydro-Aire, meanwhile, has X-rayed all of the pumps that had not yet been shipped to Boeing — about 150 pumps — and found about 3% contained the wiring problem, Ward said.
He said one pump that the company took apart after it was returned by an airline contained a wire that had been rubbed by a nearby rotor, creating concern of a potential spark. “When you have fuel covering the pump there’s no oxygen, so there can be no fire,” he said.
Other 737s, 747s and 757s were ordered to fly only with their tanks full enough to cover the pumps until further inspections could be carried out, she said.
The problem was detected on three planes that had pumps short out and stop working, giving the crew an indication of low pressure in the tank, said FAA spokesman Les Dorr.
The British carrier easyJet sent the pump back to Hydro-Aire on Aug. 12 after the crew of one of its Boeing 737s detected low pressure, Dorr said. A week later, a Northwest Airlines 747-400 reported a low pressure indication and found the same problem, he said. A China Southern Airlines 747-400 experienced the same trouble.
The National Transportation Safety Board ruled that an explosion in the center fuel tank of TWA Flight 800 caused it to crash off the coast of Long Island in 1996. It said vapors in the nearly empty tank probably were ignited by a spark in wiring.
The Paris-bound Boeing 747 exploded in a fireball at 13,700 feet, minutes after leaving John F. Kennedy International Airport. All 230 people on board were killed.
“All of our pumps that were on Flight 800 were recovered and not found to be contributors to the crash,” Ward said.
****
link: http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2002-08-30-boeing_x.htm
By: wysiwyg - 3rd September 2002 at 09:47
RE: FAA issues emergency order to inspect 1,440 Boeing jets
It seems to me that although it is being denied that there was any link between this and TWA800 the circumstances sound suspiciously similar. That is only my opinion though. The problem is that in Boeings you run the center tank dry and then the engines start drawing automatically from the wing tanks. when the center tanks are dry the fumes remaining are technically the ‘chemically correct mixture’ for combustion (generally about 13 parts air to 1 part fuel) so a spark near an empty tank is even more risky than a full one.
By: Hand87_5 - 3rd September 2002 at 07:01
RE: FAA issues emergency order to inspect 1,440 Boeing jets
wysiwyg , tell me if I’m wrong , but is it the same problem which occured a few years ago with TWA 800 flight?
By: wysiwyg - 2nd September 2002 at 20:28
RE: FAA issues emergency order to inspect 1,440 Boeing jets
Take this report with a certain pinch of salt. Yes there are some potentially problematic pumps in service but the numbers quoted are wildly inaccurate. They say 6 hundred odd 757’s affected. Well I have just had an e-mail this evening from my fleet boss saying that it only affects poduction number 1010 onwards and our last aircraft (about 1 year old) was in the upper 900’s and is unaffected. I would be surprised if this affected more than 20 757’s.
Also, what do they mean by the pilots reporting low pressures? what has that got to do with this situation. In normal operation we run center tanks until they are dry so you don’t get much lower pressure than that. The issue here is supposed to be whether they can spark or not, not what output they are producing.