dark light

FBI Looks Into Puncture Holes In US Airways Planes

Weird indeed!!!

POSTED: 8:16 am EDT October 20, 2004
CHARLOTTE — The FBI is looking into puncture holes found in the
bellies of two US Airways jets at Charlotte/Douglas International
Airport.

Similar damage was found on another of the airline’s planes in
Florida.

US Airways mechanics discovered the damage on Monday morning on their
routine maintenance checks, which are visual inspections done before
every takeoff.

No passengers were in the planes, which were temporarily grounded for
repairs.

The two planes found damaged Monday were a Boeing 737 and an Airbus
321. They came from Pensacola, Fla., and Pittsburgh.

US Airways, which has a major hub in Charlotte, says the planes had
punctures about the same size as holes a screwdriver would make.
Airline spokesman David Castelveter characterized it as minor exterior
damage.

FBI special agent Kevin Kendrick wouldn’t describe the nature of the
damage, but said it was highly unlikely to have been caused by normal
wear and tear.

Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
—-

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,132

Send private message

By: ageorge - 21st October 2004 at 18:26

In the best case, the aircraft would not be able top pressurise and would simply turn back.
Worst case: As the Cabin Pressure is initiated and stress builds around the holes they could tear open into even bigger holes… with the rush of air from being inflight then tearing the plane apart.

This is what happened to Pan Am 103. The Bomb blew a hole in the fuselage and the rush of air ripped the plane apart.

PAN AM 103 was pressurised before the side was blown out , if somebody holes the presssure cabin on the ground the pilots will get a warning that the cabin is not pressurising AFTER TAKE OFF and they simply have to land , the plane doe’s not pressurise fast enough to cause any damage via existing holes – it just wont pressurise at all .

Al

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,132

Send private message

By: ageorge - 21st October 2004 at 18:26

In the best case, the aircraft would not be able top pressurise and would simply turn back.
Worst case: As the Cabin Pressure is initiated and stress builds around the holes they could tear open into even bigger holes… with the rush of air from being inflight then tearing the plane apart.

This is what happened to Pan Am 103. The Bomb blew a hole in the fuselage and the rush of air ripped the plane apart.

PAN AM 103 was pressurised before the side was blown out , if somebody holes the presssure cabin on the ground the pilots will get a warning that the cabin is not pressurising AFTER TAKE OFF and they simply have to land , the plane doe’s not pressurise fast enough to cause any damage via existing holes – it just wont pressurise at all .

Al

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 21st October 2004 at 12:16

My understanding of aircraft is not that great, but I thought the skin of modern airliners varies in thickness from approx 1mm up to maybe 6mm+ around the windows, doors etc where more stress is exerted. I would think a screwdriver would easily go all the way through, or are the planes double skinned, similar to oil tankers?

The 737 has a skin aprox 1.5mm thick. a screwdriver would go through.

I think both the 737 and the A320 have pressurised Cargo holds.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 21st October 2004 at 12:16

My understanding of aircraft is not that great, but I thought the skin of modern airliners varies in thickness from approx 1mm up to maybe 6mm+ around the windows, doors etc where more stress is exerted. I would think a screwdriver would easily go all the way through, or are the planes double skinned, similar to oil tankers?

The 737 has a skin aprox 1.5mm thick. a screwdriver would go through.

I think both the 737 and the A320 have pressurised Cargo holds.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

52

Send private message

By: MerlinXX - 21st October 2004 at 12:03

My understanding of aircraft is not that great, but I thought the skin of modern airliners varies in thickness from approx 1mm up to maybe 6mm+ around the windows, doors etc where more stress is exerted. I would think a screwdriver would easily go all the way through, or are the planes double skinned, similar to oil tankers?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

52

Send private message

By: MerlinXX - 21st October 2004 at 12:03

My understanding of aircraft is not that great, but I thought the skin of modern airliners varies in thickness from approx 1mm up to maybe 6mm+ around the windows, doors etc where more stress is exerted. I would think a screwdriver would easily go all the way through, or are the planes double skinned, similar to oil tankers?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,663

Send private message

By: andrewm - 21st October 2004 at 11:24

Bemused since it was in Belly of Plane surely the passenger cabin is not comprimised and just cargo would be. I would imagine a screw drivers shafts length wouldnt be that longer than the internal fuse’ thickness probably not even long enough to go all the way through

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,663

Send private message

By: andrewm - 21st October 2004 at 11:24

Bemused since it was in Belly of Plane surely the passenger cabin is not comprimised and just cargo would be. I would imagine a screw drivers shafts length wouldnt be that longer than the internal fuse’ thickness probably not even long enough to go all the way through

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,046

Send private message

By: MSR777 - 21st October 2004 at 11:16

Pure speculation I know, but has all the hallmarks of a disgruntled employee.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,046

Send private message

By: MSR777 - 21st October 2004 at 11:16

Pure speculation I know, but has all the hallmarks of a disgruntled employee.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 21st October 2004 at 10:52

Mmm unless damaging something such as avionics bay would there really be a chance of it crashing? …………

In the best case, the aircraft would not be able top pressurise and would simply turn back.
Worst case: As the Cabin Pressure is initiated and stress builds around the holes they could tear open into even bigger holes… with the rush of air from being inflight then tearing the plane apart.

This is what happened to Pan Am 103. The Bomb blew a hole in the fuselage and the rush of air ripped the plane apart.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,629

Send private message

By: Bmused55 - 21st October 2004 at 10:52

Mmm unless damaging something such as avionics bay would there really be a chance of it crashing? …………

In the best case, the aircraft would not be able top pressurise and would simply turn back.
Worst case: As the Cabin Pressure is initiated and stress builds around the holes they could tear open into even bigger holes… with the rush of air from being inflight then tearing the plane apart.

This is what happened to Pan Am 103. The Bomb blew a hole in the fuselage and the rush of air ripped the plane apart.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,663

Send private message

By: andrewm - 21st October 2004 at 10:17

Mmm unless damaging something such as avionics bay would there really be a chance of it crashing? THey probably annouced this before a “The Sun” style attack on the airline so as to have the media on their side.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,663

Send private message

By: andrewm - 21st October 2004 at 10:17

Mmm unless damaging something such as avionics bay would there really be a chance of it crashing? THey probably annouced this before a “The Sun” style attack on the airline so as to have the media on their side.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

14,422

Send private message

By: steve rowell - 21st October 2004 at 10:08

That’s very strange indeed

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

14,422

Send private message

By: steve rowell - 21st October 2004 at 10:08

That’s very strange indeed

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

433

Send private message

By: Robert Hamilton - 21st October 2004 at 09:41

😮 😮 😮 Wat the hell is going on who in there sick mind would do this?? All i can say is thank god that the found this out!!!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

433

Send private message

By: Robert Hamilton - 21st October 2004 at 09:41

😮 😮 😮 Wat the hell is going on who in there sick mind would do this?? All i can say is thank god that the found this out!!!

Sign in to post a reply