You could hardly class an A346 as a private jet, but this beauty is destined for one lucky person/royal family.
By: KabirT - 21st November 2006 at 17:45
Wow…. that is one odd livery.
By: Grey Area - 21st November 2006 at 17:36
Well, that’s a very…… ahem…….. individual paint job and no mistake.
By: Hand87_5 - 21st November 2006 at 11:42
An absolutely atrocious livery
Agreed.! Makes me feel dizzy.
By: chornedsnorkack - 21st November 2006 at 09:51
The A340-600 has an incredible range with a normal passenger fit. I wonder what it is with a (possibly) lighter exec fit?
See
http://www.content.airbusworld.com/SITES/Technical_Data/docs/AC/DATA_CONSULT/AC_A340-500-600.pdf
page 54.
I also wonder if they have fitted more fuel tanks in the freight bays? What would it’s range be then?
Can the MTOW line be extrapolated down through the fuel volume limited part?
By: Bmused55 - 21st November 2006 at 09:42
The A340-600 has an incredible range with a normal passenger fit. I wonder what it is with a (possibly) lighter exec fit? I also wonder if they have fitted more fuel tanks in the freight bays? What would it’s range be then?
Rgds Cking
A silly ammount of Nautical Miles, thats for sure!
Mind you, VIP jets aren’t always lighter than PAX jets. PArticularly the big one.
The owners install so much bling and then usualy cart a car or two along with them all the time.
By: Cking - 21st November 2006 at 09:28
The A340-600 has an incredible range with a normal passenger fit. I wonder what it is with a (possibly) lighter exec fit? I also wonder if they have fitted more fuel tanks in the freight bays? What would it’s range be then?
Rgds Cking
By: Bmused55 - 21st November 2006 at 08:43
An absolutely atrocious livery
Agreed
By: Newforest - 21st November 2006 at 07:41
An absolutely atrocious livery
Makes you dizzy just looking at it! 😀
By: steve rowell - 21st November 2006 at 05:34
An absolutely atrocious livery
Sign In
November 21, 2006 at 2:43 am