October 16, 2004 at 11:47 am
And doesen’t it look crap! Especially that Thomson logo on the engines.
By: topjet330 - 16th October 2004 at 21:37
i would have thought the call sign they will start using is “Thomson” and the new code for them is going to be “TOM***” no A’s or B’s apparantly
By: topjet330 - 16th October 2004 at 21:37
i would have thought the call sign they will start using is “Thomson” and the new code for them is going to be “TOM***” no A’s or B’s apparantly
By: LBARULES - 16th October 2004 at 21:02
The 752 can get in everywhere Britannia needs it to so Danairs arguement is rubbish.
By: LBARULES - 16th October 2004 at 21:02
The 752 can get in everywhere Britannia needs it to so Danairs arguement is rubbish.
By: Moondance - 16th October 2004 at 21:00
Correct!I miss those 732s, they could fly into airports that the present BY fleet wouldnt be able to get into or out of!
Here we go again, 732s could get IN to most places, but were absolutely stuffed on performance for getting OUT of performance limited places. The 757 knocks spots off the 732 in terms of take off performance.
By: Moondance - 16th October 2004 at 21:00
Correct!I miss those 732s, they could fly into airports that the present BY fleet wouldnt be able to get into or out of!
Here we go again, 732s could get IN to most places, but were absolutely stuffed on performance for getting OUT of performance limited places. The 757 knocks spots off the 732 in terms of take off performance.
By: LBARULES - 16th October 2004 at 20:57
They couldnt fly in or out of? What the hell are you on about?
By: LBARULES - 16th October 2004 at 20:57
They couldnt fly in or out of? What the hell are you on about?
By: danairboy - 16th October 2004 at 20:52
Correct!I miss those 732s, they could fly into airports that the present BY fleet wouldnt be able to get into or out of!
By: danairboy - 16th October 2004 at 20:52
Correct!I miss those 732s, they could fly into airports that the present BY fleet wouldnt be able to get into or out of!
By: cheesebag - 16th October 2004 at 20:26
Oh no, tell me this is a bad dream. It isnt happening is it? How tacky and devoid of any class is that awful livery. What the TUI group have done to our once brilliant Britannia airways is nothing short of catastophic.
Back to the old red/blue Livery then, Eh?… Oh and bring back the 732’s??? :diablo:
By: cheesebag - 16th October 2004 at 20:26
Oh no, tell me this is a bad dream. It isnt happening is it? How tacky and devoid of any class is that awful livery. What the TUI group have done to our once brilliant Britannia airways is nothing short of catastophic.
Back to the old red/blue Livery then, Eh?… Oh and bring back the 732’s??? :diablo:
By: SHAMROCK321 - 16th October 2004 at 19:54
I really liked thw old Briattania livery but i think that 757 looks quite fresh.
By: SHAMROCK321 - 16th October 2004 at 19:54
I really liked thw old Briattania livery but i think that 757 looks quite fresh.
By: danairboy - 16th October 2004 at 19:38
LBARules says its not a loco. You fly them and then tell me they are not a loco!
By: danairboy - 16th October 2004 at 19:38
LBARules says its not a loco. You fly them and then tell me they are not a loco!
By: T5 - 16th October 2004 at 19:08
I once said that the colour scheme was the most disgusting, cluttered one that I had ever seen.
It looks even worse now! 😮
By: T5 - 16th October 2004 at 19:08
I once said that the colour scheme was the most disgusting, cluttered one that I had ever seen.
It looks even worse now! 😮
By: MANAIRPORTMAD - 16th October 2004 at 18:26
It looks not too good but not too bad to me, is that how it is going to be, or is it not yet finished? Looks incomplete?
By: MANAIRPORTMAD - 16th October 2004 at 18:26
It looks not too good but not too bad to me, is that how it is going to be, or is it not yet finished? Looks incomplete?